多维距离对我国企业国际化经营模式的影响——基于“一带一路”沿线国家面板数据的PPML回归分析

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2021.06.04.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 伴随我国与“一带一路”沿线国家经贸合作的深化，中国企业国际化经营模式的选择日益重要。基于2003—2018年期间中国对“一带一路”沿线45个国家的面板数据，综合考察多维距离对出口与外商直接投资两种主要国际化经营模式的影响。研究发现，东道国技术水平与经济自由度提升有助于扩大我国对“一带一路”沿线国家的出口与对外直接投资，制度距离、经济距离和文化距离阻遏我国企业对“一带一路”沿线国家的出口与外商直接投资，修正的地理距离可以增进我国企业对“一带一路”沿线国家的外商直接投资且助力出口。我国企业在制定对外投资决策时，应秉承“共商共建共享”的治理模式，持续强化与“一带一路”沿线国家的经贸合作。

关键词: “一带一路”, 制度距离, 文化距离, 对外直接投资, 经贸合作

Abstract: This paper integrates the factors of both home country and host country into an analytical framework and uses the Poisson Pseudo-maximum Likelihood estimation to comprehensively examine the influence of multidimensional distance on the export and foreign direct investment based on the panel data of 45 countries along the "Belt and Road" from 2003 to 2018. The results show that the improvement of the host country's technical level and economic freedom is conducive to the expansion of China's export and foreign direct investment to the countries along the "Belt and Road". Institutional distance, economic and cultural distance hinder China's export and foreign direct investment and have stronger inhibition on foreign direct investment. The revised geographical distance promotes foreign direct investment of Chinese enterprises and helps export. Therefore, Chinese enterprises should not only pay attention to the technical level and economic freedom of the host country, but should also actively take into consideration the multi-dimensional distance to weaken the inhibitory effect of multi-dimensional distance on export and foreign direct investment continuously.

Key words: the "Belt and Road", institutional distance, cultural distance, foreign direct investment, economic and trade cooperationt

中图分类号:

F746

杨杰, 胡飞. 多维距离对我国企业国际化经营模式的影响——基于“一带一路”沿线国家面板数据的PPML回归分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(1): 26-32.

YANG Jie, HU Fei. The Influence of Multi-Dimensional Distance on the International Business Model of Chinese Enterprises——A PPML Regression Analysis of Countries along the" Belt and Road"[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 24(1): 26-32.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2021.06.04.02

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/CN/Y2022/V24/I1/26

参考文献

[1] 方慧, 赵甜. 中国企业对"一带一路"国家国际化经营方式研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017(7): 17-23.
[2] 黄玖立, 周泽平. 多维度距离下的中国文化产品贸易[J]. 产业经济研究, 2015(5): 93-100.
[3] 刘杨, 曲如晓, 曾燕萍. 哪些关键因素影响了文化产品贸易[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2013(11): 72-81.
[4] Felbermayr G J, Toubal F. Cultural proximity and trade[J]. European Economic Review, 2010(2): 279-293.
[5] 万伦来, 高翔. 文化、地理与制度三重距离对中国进出口贸易的影响[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2014(5): 39-48.
[6] 许家云, 周绍杰, 胡鞍钢. 制度距离、相邻效应与双边贸易——基于"一带一路"国家空间面板模型的实证分析[J]. 财经研究, 2017(1): 75-85.
[7] 许和连, 李丽华. 文化差异对中国对外直接投资区位选择的影响分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2011(17): 154-156.
[8] Chou K H, Chen C H, Mai C C. The impact of third-country effects and economic integration on China's outward FDI[J]. Economic Modeling, 2011(1): 2154-2163.
[9] Souza C D, Peretiatko R. Cultural impact on investment destination choice of US-multinational corporation in Australia cross[J]. Cultural Management, 2005(3): 14-31.
[10] Kang Y, Jiang F. FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in east and southeast Asia: traditional economic factors and institutional perspective[J]. Journal of World Business, 2012(47): 45-53.
[11] Thomas D E, Grosse R. Country-of-Origin determinants of foreign direct investment in an emerging market: the case of mexico[J]. Journal of International Management, 2001(1): 59-79.
[12] 綦建红, 杨丽. 文化距离与我国企业OFDI的进入模式选择——基于大型企业的微观数据检验[J]. 世界经济研究, 2014(6): 55-61.
[13] 殷华方, 鲁明泓. 文化距离和国际直接投资流向: S型曲线假说[J]. 南方经济, 2011(1): 26-38.
[14] Li J, Guisinger S. The globalization of service multinationals in the'Triad' regions: Japan, western europe and north America[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1992(4): 675-696.
[15] 潘镇. 制度距离与外商直接投资——一项基于中国的经验研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2006(6): 44-49.
[16] 杜江, 宋跃刚. 制度距离、要素禀赋与我国OFDI区位选择偏好[J]. 世界经济研究, 2014(12): 47-52.
[17] Cezar R, Escobar O. Institutional distance and foreign direct investment[J]. Review of World Economics, 2015(4): 713-733.
[18] Habib M, Zurawicki L. Corruption and foreign direct investment[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2002(33): 291-307.
[19] Bénassy-Quéré A, Coupet M. Mayer T. Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment[J]. The World Economy, 2007(5): 764-782.
[20] 蒋冠宏. 制度差异、文化距离与中国企业对外直接投资风险[J]. 世界经济研究, 2015(15): 37-47.
[21] 祁春凌, 邹超. 东道国制度质量、制度距离与中国的对外直接投资区位[J]. 当代财经, 2013(7): 100-110.
[22] 王恕立, 向姣姣. 制度质量、投资动机与中国的对外直接投资的区位选择[J]. 财经研究, 2015(5): 134-144.
[23] 谢孟军, 郭艳茹. 法律制度质量对中国对外直接投资区位选择影响研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2013(6): 107-118.
[24] Bailey N, Li S. Cross-national distance and FDI: the moderating role of host country local demand[J]. Journal of International Management, 2015(4): 267-276.
[25] Amadú L Esperanca J Davcik N S. What dives foreign direct investment: the role of language, geographical distance, information flows and technological similarity[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018(88): 111-122.
[26] Morris S Jain P. Empirical Study on Inter-country OFDI[R]. MPRA Working Paper, 2014: 56194.
[27] 王永钦, 杜巨澜, 王凯. 中国对外直接投资区位选择的决定因素: 制度、税负和资源禀赋[J]. 经济研究, 2014(12): 126-142.
[28] Krautheim S. Export-supporting FDI[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2013(4): 1571-1605.
[29] 许和连, 张萌, 吴钢. 文化差异、地理距离与主要投资国在我国的FDI空间分布格局[J]. 经济地理, 2011(8): 31-35.
[30] 陈岩, 翟瑞瑞, 郭牛森. 基于多元距离视角的中国对外直接投资决定因素研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014(11): 2760-2771.
[31] 李文宇, 刘洪铎. 多维距离视角下"一带一路"构建——空间、经济、文化与制度[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2016(6): 99-112.
[32] Egger P Pfaffermayr R. Distance, Trade and FDI: A Hausman-Taylor SUR Approach[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2004(2): 227-246.
[33] 刘建, 熊燕. 能源价格差异、比较优势与中国出口贸易——基于国际面板PPML模型的经验研究[J]. 财贸研究, 2018(2): 76-87.
[34] Silva J M Santos C Silvana T. The log of gravity[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006(4): 641-658.