西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 59-63.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2012.06.012

• 政治学与法学 • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Some Thoughts on Separating “Pilferage” asa Crime and its Application in Practice

LI Fang-fang1 LI Wen2   

  1. 1.Law School of Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610225,China2.People’s Procuratorate of Hitech Zone,Chengdu Sichuan 610041,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2012-11-01 Published:2012-11-01

Abstract: The Criminal Law Amendment (VIII) defines “pilferage” as independent charge,which causes the controversy among theorists and confusion in judicial practice. From the perspective of criminal law theory,“pilferage” belongs to theft. Now that there is a crime of theft in the criminal law,a crime of “pilferage” not only brings concurrence of charge to the same act,but also brings concurrence of penalty. In judicial practice,as the amount of property loss caused by “pilferage” is not clearly defined in the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII),the amount of crime cases increases greatly,which aggravates the penalty essentially and violates the crime step theory.

Key words: crime, theft, pilferage, separating “pilferage” as a crime, the Criminal Law Amendment (VIII)

CLC Number: