Abstract: The deep evolution of the digital intelligence era has put forward historical requirements for the autonomous construction of the knowledge system of ideological and political education. The knowledge system of ideological and political education has gone through a spiral rise from spontaneous practice to theoretical consciousness, from experience summary to system construction, from passive adaptation to active guidance, and is faced with multiple conflicts in practice, such as those between technological empowerment and value guidance, between accelerated knowledge innovation and lagging academic evaluation, between blurred discipline boundaries and subjective adherence, and between open data sharing and privacy protection ethics. In the context of accelerating the construction of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, we should strengthen academic consciousness and paradigm reconstruction, promote methodological integration and computational turn, optimize academic ecology and support system, and construct narrative system and communication pattern. These systematic measures help deepen meta-theoretical consciousness and category reconstruction, innovate computation-aided ideological and political education and mixed research methods, optimize academic evaluation and institutional ecology, and construct discourse narrative that integrates China and foreign countries, so that the resulting independent knowledge system of ideological and political education with strong explanatory power, leading power and vitality provide solid academic support for the practice of ideological education and talent cultivation in the era of digital intelligence.

Key words: knowledge system of ideological and political education, the era of digital intelligence, meta-theoretical consciousness, independent knowledge system, digital ideological and political education