西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2): 68-73.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.02.012

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国实行刑事证据开示制度的可行性探析

胡 杰   

  1. 西南政法大学经济法学院,重庆 401120
  • 出版日期:2014-03-01 发布日期:2014-03-01

A Feasibility Study of Criminal Evidence Discovery System in China
 

HU Jie   

  1. School of Economic Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China
  • Online:2014-03-01 Published:2014-03-01

摘要:

证据开示制度是刑事司法中实现控辩双方平等对抗的重要保障。英美等国家的证据开示制度已相当完善,但我国对刑事证据开示制度的研究尚显滞后。近年来,要求在我国确立刑事证据开示制度的呼声变得越来越强烈,对此,许多省份在司法实践中都进行了相应探索和实践,为证据开示制度的建立奠定了基础。我国现有的良好立法基础、实践中积累的丰富经验、对国外成果的借鉴,可以确保我们能够建立具有中国特色的社会主义刑事证据开示制度。探析刑事证据开示制度在我国实行的可行性问题,不仅符合刑事司法改革的趋势和要求,而且有利于建立平等的诉讼对抗模式,平衡控辩双方的诉讼地位。

关键词: 刑事诉讼, 证据开示, 刑事司法, 平等对抗, 司法效率

Abstract:

Evidence discovery is an important way to achieve equality for prosecutors and defendants in criminal justice. Some countries such as the UK and the US have established a fully developed evidence discovery system,but studies on criminal evidence discovery system in China lags behind them. In recent years,appeals for establishing criminal evidence discovery system in China have become increasingly urgent. Many provinces have made exploration in practice,wihch has laid a foundation for the establishment of the system. China is to establish socialist criminal evidence discovery with Chinese characteristics as it has a good legislation foundation and rich experiences in practice,and it can learn from foreign evidence discovery systems. Feasibility studies of criminal evidence discovery system in China not only meets requirements of criminal justice reform,but also is conducive to the realization of equality of confrontation between the prosecutor and the defendant in criminal justice.

Key words: criminal procedure, evidence discovery, criminal justice, equality of confrontation, judicial efficiency