西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 77-88.

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大熊猫国家公园生态法庭环境司法问题实证研究——以193份裁判文书为考察样本

傅晶晶1, 陈朝1, 余琦2   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学法学院, 四川 成都 610500;
    2. 成都铁路运输第二法院, 四川 成都 610200
  • 发布日期:2025-10-24
  • 作者简介:傅晶晶,西南石油大学法学院教授,院长,研究方向:环境资源法学;余琦,成都铁路运输第二法院四级法官,副院长,研究方向:环境资源刑事审判。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省哲学社会科学规划项目“更高水平‘天府粮仓’耕地保护的法治保障研究”(SC23FZ050)。

An Empirical Study on Environmental Justice in the Ecological Court of the Giant Panda National Park——An Examination of 193 Judicial Decisions

FU Jingjing1, CHEN Zhao1, YU Qi2   

  1. 1. School of Law, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610500, China;
    2. Second Court of Chengdu Railway Transportation, Chengdu Sichuan, 610200, China
  • Published:2025-10-24

摘要: 自党的十八届三中全会首次提出“建立国家公园体制”以来,我国已进入全面推进以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系建设阶段。国家公园生态法庭作为专门化的环境资源审判机构,在集中解决生态纠纷、惩治环境犯罪、推动生态修复等方面发挥着关键作用,是国家公园体制建设的重要组成部分。然而,既有研究多是从宏观理论视角展开叙事,缺少基于司法判例的实证分析考察,不能充分回应环境司法保护因地制宜的特点。因此,通过对大熊猫国家公园生态法庭193份裁判文书实证研究发现,大熊猫国家公园环境司法存在赔偿金管理模式不统一、气候变化诉讼尚未实现类案化、生态环境修复责任与损害赔偿认定混同等问题。鉴于此,本文遵循环境法治整体统一原则,针对上述问题,分别提出了完善赔偿金管理制度、探索气候变化类型诉讼的可行路径、健全生态环境修复责任法律规范等建议,旨在为大熊猫国家公园生态司法保护及区域环境治理提供理论支撑。

关键词: 生态环境, 国家公园, 区域环境司法, 环境保护

Abstract: Since the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee first proposed to "establish a national park system", China has entered a comprehensive stage of constructing a nature reserve system with national parks at its core. National park ecological courts, as specialized judicial bodies for environmental and resource protection, play crucial roles in resolving ecological disputes, punishing environmental crimes, and promoting ecological restoration, thereby constituting an integral part of the national park system. However, existing researches provide more macro-level theoretical discussions but lack empirical analysis based on judicial precedents, failing to adequately address the localized characteristics of environmental judicial protection. Through empirical analysis of 193 judicial decisions from the Giant Panda National Park Ecological Court, this study identifies several issues in the environmental judiciary of the Giant Panda National Park, including inconsistent compensation management mechanisms, lack of typification in climate change litigation, and confusion between ecological restoration obligations and damage compensation determinations. Therefore, guided by the principle of integrated and unified environmental rule of law, this paper proposes specific recommendations such as improving compensation management systems, exploring feasible pathways for climate change-related litigation, and refining legal standards for ecological restoration responsibilities, aiming to provide theoretical support for ecological judicial protection and regional environmental governance within the Giant Panda National Park.

Key words: ecological environment, national park, regional environmental justice, environmental protection

中图分类号: