干法脱硫剂的优选及在地下储气库的应用

doi:10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.03.031

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2008, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 119-122.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.03.031

干法脱硫剂的优选及在地下储气库的应用

王京博

辽河油田公司勘探开发研究院试验技术研究所，辽宁盘锦 124010

收稿日期:2007-05-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-06-20 发布日期:2008-06-20

OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATION OF DRY METHOD DESULFURIZER IN UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS STORAGE

WANG Jing-bo

Institute of Petroleum Exploration and development,Liaohe Oilfield Company,PetroChina,Panjin Liaoning 124010,China

Received:2007-05-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-06-20 Published:2008-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过实验研究了几种氧化铁型脱硫剂和活性炭脱硫剂的工作特性及各种工艺参数对其穿透硫容的影响。以实验结果为基础，对这两种干法脱硫剂进行了比选。结果表明，氧化铁脱硫剂以EF-2为最佳，活性炭脱硫剂以3018为最佳；评价认为3018具有较高的脱硫效率和安全性，更加适合现场应用。在此基础上，研究了3018浸渍改性活性炭脱硫剂的影响因素，并在大庆油田喇嘛甸储气库进行了应用。应用表明，3018改性活性炭脱硫剂效果较好，天然气净化后H₂S含量低于国家标准。

关键词: 氧化铁, 脱硫剂, 活性炭, 浸渍剂, 硫容

Abstract: The characteristics of ferric oxide desulphurizer and active carbon desulphurizer and effects of various processing parameters on break through sulfur capacity are studied through experiment.The two kinds of desulphurizers are compared based on the experimental data.Experimental results indicate that EF-2 of ferric oxide desulphurizer and 3018 of carbon desulphurizer are better.3018 carbon desulphurizer is of better desulfurizing efficiency and safety,it is more suitable to be applied in field.Influencing factors of 3018 dipping modified active carbon desulphurizer is studied and was applied in Lamadian underground natural gas storage,Daqing Oilfield.The application shows that 3018 modified active carbon desulphurizer can clean content of H₂S below national standard.

Key words: ferric oxide, desulphurizer, active carbon, additive, breakthrough sulfur capacity

中图分类号: