基于产出气密度的富气驱气/水交替注入新方法

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.12.30.01

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 95-100.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.12.30.01

基于产出气密度的富气驱气/水交替注入新方法

王生奎1，2 *，张卫东3，袁向春1，魏旭光3，蔡茂佳4

1. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院博士后工作站，北京海淀100083
2. 中国石油大学（北京）博士后流动站，北京昌平102249
3. 中国石化国际石油勘探开发有限公司，北京朝阳100101
4. 中国石油大港油田分公司勘探公司，天津大港300280

出版日期:2016-06-01 发布日期:2016-06-01
通讯作者: 王生奎，E-mail：skwang.sipc@sinopec.com

New WAG Injection Model Based on the Produced Gas Density#br# Variation for Enriched-gas Flooding

WANG Shengkui1，2*, ZHANG Weidong3, YUAN Xiangchun1, WEI Xuguang3, CAI Maojia4

1. Post-doctoral Research Station，SINOPEC E&P Research Institute，Haidian，Beijing 100083，China
2. Post-doctoral Research Station，China University of Petroleum（Beijing），Changping，Beijing 102249，China
3. SINOPEC International Petroleum E&P Corporation，Chaoyang，Beijing 100101，China
4. Exploration Branch，Dagang Oilfield Company，PetroChina，Dagang，Tianjin 300280，China

Online:2016-06-01 Published:2016-06-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目前文献报道的各类气/水交替（WAG）注入方法中，采用采收率、TRF（Tertiary recovery factor）、累计净现金流
及NPV 等常用指标来优化段塞方案时经常会得出不同结论，其实质是该类WAG 设计方法本身就忽略了注入气与波
及区剩余油的定量关系。通过富气驱过程中产出气密度变化规律研究，提出了一种高效的富气驱WAG 注入新方法，
即EWAG（Efficiency WAG）定量优化设计各WAG 周期的气段塞、水段塞及WAG 总周期数。在M 油田算例研究中，
与几种常用的WAG 注入方法相比较，EWAG 在采收率、TRF、液化气回采率及累计净现金流等指标上均优势明显。

关键词: 富气驱, 凝析, 产出气密度, 驱替效率, EWAG

Abstract:

When using the WAG models proposed in the literatures，different slug conclusions are obtained by using common
indexes such as oil recovery，TRF，cumulative net cash flow and NPV. The reason is that the WAG design method has
neglected the quantitative relationship between the injected enriched-gas volume and the amount of remaining oil in the swept
region. In this paper，an efficient optimization and design method is proposed and developed for water-alternating-gas injection
model（EWAG）injection process. The proposed technique is able to quantitatively determine the sizes of the enriched-gas slug
and water slug for each cycle of the water-alternating-gas（WAG），as well as the total number of injection cycles. Applying this
method provides this opportunity to implement the WAG scenario more efficiently and economically. The numerical simulation
showed that in comparison with other conventional WAG scenarios with traditional optimization approaches，the EWAG has
the obvious advantages of evaluation indices，such as the oil recovery factor and cumulative net cash flow.

Key words: enriched-gas flooding, condensate, produced gas density, displacement efficiency, EWAG

中图分类号:

TE357.7

王生奎1，2 *，张卫东3，袁向春1，魏旭光3，蔡茂佳4. 基于产出气密度的富气驱气/水交替注入新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(3): 95-100.

WANG Shengkui1，2*, ZHANG Weidong3, YUAN Xiangchun1, WEI Xuguang3, CAI Maojia4. New WAG Injection Model Based on the Produced Gas Density#br# Variation for Enriched-gas Flooding[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(3): 95-100.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.12.30.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2016/V38/I3/95

参考文献

[1] CHRISTENSEN J R，STENBY E H，SKAUGE A. Review
of WAG field experience[C]. SPE 39883，1998.
[2] ESMAIEL T E，FALLAH S，VAN Kruijsdijk. Determination
of WAG ratios and slug sizes under uncertainty in a
smart wells environment[C]. SPE 93569，2005.
[3] AWAN A R，TEIGLAND R，KLEPPE J. A survey of
north sea enhanced-oil-recovery projects initiated during
the years 1975 to 2005[C]. SPE 99546，2008.
[4] HUANG E T S，HOLM L W. Effect of WAG injection and
wettability on oil recovery during carbon dioxide flooding[
C]. SPE 15491，1988.
[5] BERMUDEZ L，JOHNS R T，PARAKH H. Parametric
investigation of WAG floods above the MME[C]. SPE
84366，2007.
[6] HADLOW R E. Update of industry experience with CO2
injection[C]. SPE 24928，1992.
[7] SKAUGE A，LARSEN J A. New approach to model
the WAG process[C]//Bergen：15th International Energy
Agency Collaborative Project on Enhanced Oil Recovery，
Workshop and Symposium，Norway，1994.
[8] MA T D，RUGEN J A，STOISITS R F，et al. Simultaneous
water and gas injection pilot at the Kuparuk River
field（reservoir impact）[C]. SPE 30726，1995.
[9] SOLANO R，JOHNS R T，LAKE L W. Impact of reservoir
mixing on recovery in enriched-gas drives above the
minimum miscibility enrichment[C]. SPE 73829，2001.
[10] ARNE S，ELISABETH I D. Progress in immiscible WAG
modeling[C]. SPE 111435，2007.
[11] TEWARI R D，RIYADI S，KITTRELL C，et al. Maximizing
the oil recovery through immiscible water alternating
gas（IWAG）in mature offshore field[C]. SPE 133345，
2010.
[12] MOGHANLOO R G，LAKE L W. Simultaneous watergas-
injection performance under loss of miscibility[C].
SPE 129966，2010.
[13] ZAHOOR A，DERAHMAN M N，YUNAN M H. WAG
process design– an updated review[J]. Brazilian Journal of
Petroleum and Gas，2011，5：109 121.
[14] SURGUCHEV L M，KORBOL R，KRAKSTAD O S. Optimum
water alternate gas injection schemes for stratified
reservoirs[C]. SPE 24646，1992.
[15] KULKARNI M M. Immiscible and miscible gas-oil displacements
in porous media[M]. A master Thesis，The
Craft and Hawkins Department of Petroleum Engineering，
University of Pune，India，2003.
[16] CHEN S，LI H，YANG D，et al. Optimal parametric
design for water-alternating-gas（WAG）process in a
CO2-miscible flooding reservoir[J]. Journal of Canadian
Petroleum Technology，2010，49（10）：75 82.
[17] ARYA A，HEWETT T A，LARSON R G，et al. Dispersion
and reservoir heterogeneity[C]. SPE 14364，1988.
[18] STALKUP F L. Effect of gas enrichment and numerical
dispersion on enriched-gas-drive prediction[C]. SPE
18060，1990.
[19] MAHADEVAN J，LAKE L W，JOHNS R T. Estimation
of true dispersivity in field scale permeable media[C]. SPE
75247，2002.
[20] HOLM L W，JOSENDAL V A. Discussion of determination
and perdition of CO2 minimum miscibility pressure[
J]. JPET Tech，1980，32（5）：870 871.

基于产出气密度的富气驱气/水交替注入新方法

New WAG Injection Model Based on the Produced Gas Density#br# Variation for Enriched-gas Flooding

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蒋维军, 杨志成, 马跃, 张彩旗, 于喜艳, 孙雷, 刘洋. BZ19-6凝析气藏超临界强反凝析对气井产能的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 47(6): 72-82.
[2]	崔凯, 陈强, 刘德生, 孙雷, 汪勇. 白莲枯竭凝析气藏CCUS-EOR控制机制[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 47(2): 115-126.
[3]	郭巧珍, 李道清, 仇鹏, 闫利恒, 罗建新. 克拉美丽火山岩凝析气藏产水规律及产水模式[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(5): 106-114.
[4]	李祖友, 唐雷, 殷鸿尧, 冯玉军. 川西老区中浅层新型泡排药剂研发与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(3): 176-187.
[5]	李凤, 张本艳, 朱婧. 致密砂岩气藏反凝析伤害及开采对策研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(3): 197-206.
[6]	赵坤山, 王勇, 丁丽娟, 崔灿, 贺海波. 基于模糊数学的凝析气藏开发效果评价方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(3): 91-99.
[7]	康博, 张烈辉, 王健, 范坤, 王宏. 裂缝-孔洞型碳酸盐岩凝析气井出水特征及预测[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1): 107-113.
[8]	刘月娥1，杨雯雯1，邬国栋2，阿不都维力·阿不力米提2，徐向红1. 抗油抗高矿化度泡沫排水剂的室内研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(3): 146-150.
[9]	马青印1，李才学1，毕建霞2，苏道敏2，蒋森堡2. 白庙致密砂岩凝析气藏水平井优化设计[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(2): 85-90.
[10]	陈文龙1，2，赵军1，吕波2，雷震宇3. 塔里木油田凝析气井产出剖面解释方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(6): 78-82.
[11]	陈浩;杨胜来;于东海;李芳芳;章星. 多孔介质内流体相态特征超声波探测研究进展[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(1): 67-73.
[12]	廖发明;苗继军;陈文龙;邓军;王怒涛. 凝析气井产能和储量计算新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(4): 100-104.
[13]	李骞;李相方;李艳静;彭翼;崔力功. 凝析气藏不同开发阶段的合理生产压差探讨[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(1): 121-126.
[14]	隋淑玲郭平杜建芬肖丽仙. 低渗多孔介质中凝析气衰竭实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(3): 97-100.
[15]	张小波;郑学男邰德军孟明辉 . SAGD添加非凝析气技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(2): 113-117.