层理地层基质与弱面坍塌失稳规律分析

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.12.05.02

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 128-137.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.12.05.02

层理地层基质与弱面坍塌失稳规律分析

刘海龙¹, 谢涛¹, 张磊¹, 曹文科², 高佳佳³

1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司, 天津塘沽 300459;
2. 常州大学石油工程学院, 江苏常州 213164;
3. 西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院, 四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2019-12-05 出版日期:2021-04-10 发布日期:2021-04-23
通讯作者: 刘海龙,E-mail:liuhl51@cnooc.com.cn
作者简介:刘海龙,1989年生,男,汉族,山西吕梁人,工程师,硕士,主要从事钻井工程设计及其应用研究工作。E-mail:liuhl51@cnooc.com.cn
谢涛,1981年生,男,汉族,山东烟台人,高级工程师,主要从事钻井方面的研究及管理工作。E-mail:xietao3@cnooc.com.cn
张磊,1990年生,女,汉族,河北唐山人,工程师,硕士,主要从事钻井方面的研究。E-mail:zhanglei134@cnooc.com.cn
曹文科,1984年生,男,汉族,山东郓城人,讲师,博士,主要从事岩石力学相关研究。E-mail:caowenke@cczu.edu.cn
高佳佳,1989年生,男,汉族,陕西泾阳人,讲师,博士,主要从事孔隙介质力学井壁稳定方面的研究。E-mail:jiajgao@swpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
中海石油（中国）有限公司综合科研项目（YXKY-2018-TJ-03）

Analysis of Collapse Matrix and Weak Plane of Bedding Strata

LIU Hailong¹, XIE Tao¹, ZHANG Lei¹, CAO Wenke², GAO Jiajia³

1. CNOOC China Limited, Tianjin Branch, Tanggu, Tianjin 300459, China;
2. School of Petroleum Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213164, China;
3. Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2019-12-05 Online:2021-04-10 Published:2021-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渤海深部地层中存在大量的硬脆性泥页岩，易发生井壁失稳问题。将硬脆性泥页岩当作一种横观各向同性介质，建立了横观各向同性地层井周基质及层理弱面应力计算模型，在此基础上，获取了弹性参数各向异性、井眼轨迹及层理产状对井壁坍塌破坏的影响规律。研究表明，各向异性对层理弱面应力分布影响显著，与各向同性模型相比，误差最大约为31%；随弹性模量各向异性程度增大，井壁坍塌风险增高；直井钻进时，井壁坍塌破坏方位不仅受水平地应力方位影响，还与层理弱面的倾斜角和倾向角、井眼轨迹等参数相关。随层理面倾斜角和倾向角增大，井壁坍塌形状依次为岩石只发生沿水平最小地应力方位的基质坍塌、层理面单对角坍塌及层理面双对角坍塌，基质坍塌方位对应最小地应力方位，层理面坍塌方位与弱面的倾向方位保持一致，最优钻井方位应结合层理弱面的倾向；当定向井钻进时，井眼沿井斜30°~75°，最大地应力方位附近，坍塌最为严重。对渤中一口深井进行井壁失稳实例分析，分析结果与实际情况吻合良好，研究成果对层理地层钻井作业有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 横观各向同性, 力学参数, 弱面, 基质, 坍塌

Abstract: There are a lot of hard brittle shale in deep strata of Bohai Bay, which is prone to cause wellbore instability. Taking hard and brittle shale as a kind of transversely isotropic medium, the stress calculation model of well circumference matrix and bedding plane is established. On the basis, influence of elastic anisotropy parameter, wellbore anisotropy and bedding formation on wellbore collapse is obtained. The results show that anisotropy has a significant effect on the stress distribution of the weak surface. The maximum error is about 31% compared with the isotropic model. With the increase of elastic modulus anisotropy, the risk of wellbore collapse increases. The direction of wellbore collapse is not only affected by the horizontal stress orientation, but also by the inclination and squint angle of weak bedding surface and well trajectory when drilling in a vertical well. With the increase of inclination and squint angle of weak bedding plane, the collapse shapes of the wellbore are as follows:matrix collapse only along the minimum horizontal stress direction, single diagonal collapse of bedding plane and double diagonal collapse of bedding plane. The collapse orientation of the matrix corresponds to the minimum in-situ orientation, and the collapse orientation of the bedding plane is consistent with the dip direction azimuth. The optimum drilling azimuth should be combined with the squint angle of bedding plane. When matrix failure and weak surface failure occur simultaneously, the collapse risk increases with the increase of well inclination. The collapse is the most serious along well deviation 30°~75°, near the maximum in-situ stress azimuth when drilling in a directional well. An example of a deep well in Bozhong structure is analyzed. The analysis results of wall collapse pressure are in good agreement with the actual situation. The research results have certain guiding significance for drilling operation in bedding strata.

Key words: transversely isotropic, mechanical parameters, weak plane, matrix, collapse

中图分类号:

TE22

刘海龙, 谢涛, 张磊, 曹文科, 高佳佳. 层理地层基质与弱面坍塌失稳规律分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 128-137.

LIU Hailong, XIE Tao, ZHANG Lei, CAO Wenke, GAO Jiajia. Analysis of Collapse Matrix and Weak Plane of Bedding Strata[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2021, 43(2): 128-137.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.12.05.02

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2021/V43/I2/128

参考文献

[1] AMADER B. Rock anisotropy and the theory of stress measurements[C]//BREBBIA C, ORSZAG S. Lecture Notes in Engineering. Berlin:Springer Verlag, 1983:87-116. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82040-3
[2] AADNOY B S. Continuum mechanics analysis of the stability of inclined boreholes in anisotropic rock formations[D]. Trondheim:The Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1987.
[3] ONG S H. Borehole stability[D]. Norman OK:University of Oklahoma, 1994.
[4] GUPTA D J, ZAMAN M. Stability of boreholes in a geologic medium including the effects of anisotropy[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1999, 20(8):837-866. doi:10.1007/BF02452483
[5] 胡秀章,王肖均,李永池. 层状岩石中井孔稳定性的数值分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2004,31(4):89-92,98. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2004.04.026 HU Xiuzhang, WANG Xiaojun, LI Yongchi. Numerical analysis of borehole stability in the bedded formation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(4):89-92, 98. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2004.04.026
[6] 王永亮,庄茁,柳占立,等. 横观各向同性岩石力学-化学-损伤耦合有限元分析[J]. 工程力学,2017,34(9):102-109. doi:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.04.0287 WANG Yongliang, ZHUANG Zhuo, LIU Zhanli, et al. Finite element analysis of transversely isotropic rock with mechanical-chemical-damage coupling[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(9):102-109. doi:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.04.0287
[7] GAEDE O, KARPFINGER F, JOCKER J, et al. Comparison between analytical and 3D finite element solutions for borehole stresses in anisotropic elastic rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2012, 51(4):53-63. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.12.010
[8] 马天寿,陈平. 采用孔隙热弹性模型分析页岩井眼失稳规律[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2014,10(5):1183-1191. MA Tianshou, CHEN Ping. Analysis of wellbore instability law of shale formations by porothermoelastic mechanics model[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2014, 10(5):1183-1191.
[9] 曹文科,邓金根,蔚宝华,等. 弹性参数各向异性对页岩井周应力的影响[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,31(5):27-35,42. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2016.05.004 CAO Wenke, DENG Jin'gen, YU Baohua, et al. Effect of anisotropy of elastic parameters of shale formation on stress distribution around wellbore[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 31(5):27-35, 42. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2016.05.004
[10] 曹文科,邓金根,蔚宝华,等. 页岩层理弱面对井壁坍塌影响分析[J]. 中国海上油气,2017,29(2):114-122. doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2017.02.016 CAO Wenke, DENG Jin'gen, YU Baohua, et al. Analysis on the influence of bedding shale weak planes on borehole caving[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(2):114-122. doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2017.02.016
[11] 陈峥嵘. 页岩横观各向同性储层水平井井周应力预测模型[J]. 科学技术与工程,2017,17(24):26-31. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.24.005 CHEN Zhengrong. Prediction model of borehole stress of horizontal well in transversely isotropy shale gas formation[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(24):26-31. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.24.005
[12] 卢运虎,陈勉,袁建波,等. 各向异性地层中斜井井壁失稳机理[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(3):563-568. doi:10.7623/syxb201303022 LU Yunhu, CHEN Mian, YUAN Jianbo, et al. Borehole instability mechanism of a deviated well in anisotropic formations[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(3):563-568. doi:10.7623/syxb201303022
[13] 刘向君,陈一健,肖勇. 岩石软弱面产状对井壁稳定性的影响[J]. 西南石油学院学报,2001,23(6):12-13,20. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2001.06.004 LIU Xiangjun, CHEN Yijian, XIAO Yong. Effect of weak plane dip angle and dip azimuth angle on wellbore stability[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2001, 23(6):12-13, 20. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2001.06.004
[14] 秦启荣,邓辉. 裂缝对石油井壁力学稳定性影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报,2007,29(4):167-170. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2007.04.044 QIN Qirong, DENG Hui. Influence of rock fractureson mechanical stability of well-wall[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, 2007, 29(4):167-170. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2007.04.044
[15] 范翔宇,吴昊,殷晟,等. 考虑井壁稳定及增产效果的页岩气水平井段方位优化方法[J]. 天然气工业,2014,34(12):94-99. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.12.013 FAN Xiangyu, WU Hao, YIN Sheng, et al. An optimal method of horizontal interval azimuth for a shale gas well considering wellbore stability and stimulation effects[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(12):94-99. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.12.013
[16] 马天寿,陈平. 页岩层理对水平井井壁稳定的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(5):97-104. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.06.30.03 MA Tianshou, CHEN Ping. Influence of shale bedding plane on wellbore stability for horizontal wells[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(5):97-104. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.06.30.03
[17] HIKWEON L, ONG S H, AZEEMUDDIN M, et al. A wellbore stability model for formations with anisotropic rock strengths[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, 96-97:109-119. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2012.08.010
[18] 刘志远,陈勉,金衍,等. 多弱面地层水平井裸眼井壁垮塌量计算模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):102-107. doi:10.11698/PED.2014.01.13 LIU Zhiyuan, CHEN Mian, JIN Yan, et al. Calculation model for bore-hole collapse volume of a horizontal openhole in multiple-weakplane formation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1):102-107. doi:10.11698/PED.2014.01.13
[19] GAUTAM R. Anisotropy in deformations and hydraulic properties of Colorado shale[D]. Calgary:University of Calgary, 2004.
[20] LEKHNITSKⅡ S G. Theory of the elasticity of anisotropic bodies[M]. Moscow:Nauka, 1977.
[21] AADNOY B S. Modeling of the stability of highly inclined boreholes in anisotropic rock formations[C]. SPE 16526-PA, 1988. doi:10.2118/16526-PA
[22] 张卫东,常龙,高佳佳. 横观各向同性地层井壁应力分析[J]. 工程力学,2015,32(11):243-250. doi:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.04.0348 ZHANG Weidong, CHANG Long, GAO Jiajia. Stress analysis at the borehole wall intransverse isotropic formations[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(11):243-250. doi:10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.04.0348
[23] 徐芝纶. 弹性力学(上册)[M]. 4版. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006:191-193.

层理地层基质与弱面坍塌失稳规律分析

Analysis of Collapse Matrix and Weak Plane of Bedding Strata

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张烈辉, 崔乾晨, 谢军, 郑健, 李成勇. 页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 1-12.
[2]	刘厚彬, 崔帅, 孟英峰, 吴双, 吴坷. 川西硬脆性页岩力学特征及井壁稳定性研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 60-67.
[3]	郑伟, 朱国金, 谭先红, 刘新光, 王磊. 海上稠油火烧油层物理模拟实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 107-112.
[4]	王伟. 春风油田排66块火成岩储层成因模式分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(6): 25-33.
[5]	未晛, 殷晗钧. 一种计算岩石基质压缩系数的方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(6): 78-84.
[6]	李伟, 梁利喜, 刘向君, 王涛. 地层孔隙压力变化对井壁稳定性的影响研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(6): 63-68.
[7]	马天寿, 杨子莘, 陈平, 郭昭学. 基于真三轴强度准则分析页岩斜井坍塌风险[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1): 161-168.
[8]	纪国法1 *，杨兆中1，李小刚1，刘文涛2，周瀚3. 考虑蚓孔的碳酸盐岩酸化产能计算新模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(3): 90-94.
[9]	周成华1 *，张珍1，胡德云1，杨国兴1，邓元洲2. 广西百色油田那读组油基钻井液技术[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(2): 129-135.
[10]	马天寿，陈平. 页岩层理对水平井井壁稳定的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(5): 97-104.
[11]	范翔宇;康海涛;龚明;何传亮;陈颖杰. 川东北山前高陡构造地应力精细计算方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(3): 41-46.
[12]	梁丹;;曾祥林;房茂军;. 测井资料在南堡 35–2 油田出砂预测中的应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(4): 59-63.
[13]	徐婷张学洪谭中良伦增珉吕成远 . 碳酸盐岩基质岩块底水驱替作用分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(5): 112-116.
[14]	崔顺贤廖凌叶顶鹏练章华袁中华 . 非正常井眼对气体钻井下部钻具受力影响研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(4): 150-152.
[15]	周军平鲜学福姜永东李晓红姜德义. 考虑有效应力和煤基质收缩效应的渗透率模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(1): 4-8.