游荡型辫状河沉积特征及沉积相模式

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.01.13.04

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 35-52.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.01.13.04

游荡型辫状河沉积特征及沉积相模式

王海考¹, 王淼¹, 于忠良¹, 余成林¹, 尹艳树²

1. 中国石油冀东油田勘探开发研究院, 河北唐山 063200;
2. 长江大学地球科学学院, 湖北武汉 430100

收稿日期:2022-01-13 出版日期:2024-02-10 发布日期:2024-02-01
通讯作者: 尹艳树,E-mail:yys@yangtzeu.edu.cn
作者简介:王海考，1981年生，男，汉族，湖北荆州人，工程师，主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究。E-mail:603179068@qq.com;王淼，1988年生，女，汉族，吉林松原人，工程师，硕士，主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究。E-mail:wangmiao2013@petrochina.com.cn;于忠良，1981年生，男，汉族，黑龙江海伦人，高级工程师，硕士，主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究。E-mail:yu_zhong_liang@126.com;余成林，1979年生，男，汉族，湖北仙桃人，高级工程师，博士，主要从事油气田地质及开发方面的研究工作。E-mail:29739365@qq.com;尹艳树，1978年生，男，汉族，湖北仙桃人，教授，博士研究生导师，主要从事油气田地质及储层建模方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail:yys@yangtzeu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41872138）

Characteristics and Sedimentary Facies Model of Wandering Braided Rivers

WANG Haikao¹, WANG Miao¹, YU Zhongliang¹, YU Chenglin¹, YIN Yanshu²

1. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Jidong Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Tangshan, Hebei 063200, China;
2. School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China

Received:2022-01-13 Online:2024-02-10 Published:2024-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对冀东油田高104-5区块馆陶组辫状河模式认识不清、砂体预测不准的问题，开展砂质辫状河河型分类研究。首先，根据区域地质背景、古气候、岩石粒度、层理构造、相序、溢岸、落淤层发育情况以及砂体形态等指标确定研究区为游荡型辫状河。随后，以Miall构型要素分析理论为指导，建立了辫流带、单一辫流带内河道和心滩边界识别标志，实现了研究区游荡型辫状河结构解剖，确定研究区单一辫流带宽度平均1 400.00 m，单一辫流带内心滩平均长度为414.47 m，宽度平均为158.86 m，河道宽度平均53.18 m。心滩长宽比集中在2.0~4.0，心滩宽度与辫状河道宽度比为2.2，为宽坝窄河道辫状河沉积模式。最后采用沉积数值模拟的方法，建立了研究区游荡型辫状河沉积相模式，可为油田开发提供指导。

关键词: 游荡型辫状河, 河型分类, 沉积构型, 沉积相模式, 高104-5区块

Abstract: Aiming at the problem of unclear knowledge and unclear patterns of sandy braided river in Guantao Formation of Block Gao 104-5 in Jidong Oilfield, a classification study of sandy braided rivers was carried out, using criteria including regional geological background, paleoclimate, rock grain size, bedding structure and facies sequence, levee and mud drapes, and sand body morphology. The study area is determined to be a wandering braided river. Then, the architectural element analysis method from Miall is adopted to anatomize the wandering braided river. The two types of identification marks of braided belt boundary and 3 types of identification marks of river channel and mid channel bar are constructed to anatomize the wandering braided channel. The result shows that the scale of the channel belts are about 1 400.00 m wide, the width and length of mid channel bar are about 158.86 m and 414.47 m, respectively; the width of channel is 53.18 m. and the length/width of mid channel is about 2~4; the average width of mid channel bar and channel is 2.2. So the study area is categorized as the wide bar and narrow channel pattern. Finally, using depositional simulation methods, a wandering braided river sedimentary facies model in the study area was established to guide oilfield development.

Key words: wandering braided river, braided river classification, reservoir architecture, sedimentary facies model, Block Gao 104-5

中图分类号:

TE122

王海考, 王淼, 于忠良, 余成林, 尹艳树. 游荡型辫状河沉积特征及沉积相模式[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(1): 35-52.

WANG Haikao, WANG Miao, YU Zhongliang, YU Chenglin, YIN Yanshu. Characteristics and Sedimentary Facies Model of Wandering Braided Rivers[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2024, 46(1): 35-52.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.01.13.04

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2024/V46/I1/35

参考文献

[1] MIALL A D. A review of the braided river depositional environment[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 1977, 13(1): 1–62. doi: 10.1016/0012-8252(77)90055-1
[2] MIALL A D. Architectural-element analysis: A new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 1985, 22(4): 261–308. doi: 10.1016/0012-8252(85)90001-7
[3] 廖保方，张为民，李列，等. 辫状河现代沉积研究与相模式——中国永定河剖析[J]. 沉积学报， 1998， 16(1):34-39. doi:10.1088/0256-307X/16/9/027 LIAO Baofang, ZHANG Weimin, LI Lie, et al. Study on modern deposit of a braided stream and factes model: Taking the Yongding River as an example[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1998, 16(1): 34–39. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/16/9/027
[4] SMITH G S, HUNT I, ASHWORTH P, et al. Sedimentological imapct of a large flood revealed using sequential GPR surveys[C]. Columbus Ohio: The 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 2006.
[5] SCHUURMAN F, KLEINHANS M G. Bar dynamics and bifurcation evolution in a modelled braided sandbed river[J]. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 2015, 40(10): 1318–1333. doi: 10.1002/esp.3722
[6] BRIDGE J S, TYE R S. Interpreting the dimensions of ancient fluvial channel bars, channels, and channel belts from wire-logs and cores[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1999, 83(8): 1205–1228. doi: 10.1306/E4FD4B07-1732-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[7] SKELLY R L, BRISTOW C S, ETHRIDGE F G. Architecture of channel-belt deposits in an aggrading shallow sandbed braided river: The lower Niobrara River, northeast Nebraska[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2003, 158(3–4): 249–270. doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(02)00313-5
[8] 钱宁. 关于河流分类及成因问题的讨论[J]. 地理学报， 1985， 40(1):1-10. QIAN Ning. On the classification and causes of formation of different channel patterns[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1985, 40(1): 1–10.
[9] MANNA M O, SCHERER C, BÁLLICO M B, et al. Changes in fluvial architecture induced by discharge variability, Jaicós Formation (Silurian–Devonian), Parnaíba Basin, Brazil[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2021, 420: 105924. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2021.105924
[10] 王敏，穆龙新，赵国良，等. 分汊与游荡型辫状河储层构型研究:以苏丹FN油田为例[J]. 地学前缘， 2017， 24(2):246-256. doi:10.13745/j.esf.yx.2016-12-26 WANG Min, MU Longxin, ZHAO Guoliang, et al. Architecture analysis of reservoirs in branching-and wanderingbased braided rivers: Taking FN Field, Sudan as an example[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2017, 24(2): 246–256. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.yx.2016-12-26
[11] 王敏，赵国良，孙天建，等. 分汊与游荡型辫状河隔夹层层次结构特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报（自然科学版)， 2017， 39(6):69-77. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2016.07.12.02 WANG Min, ZHAO Guoliang, SUN Tianjian, et al. Hierarchy characterization of intercalations in branchingbased and wandering-based braided river reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 39(6): 69–77. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2016.07.12.02
[12] 解哲辉，黄河清，周园园，等. 游荡性河流演变规律研究进展及其河型归属探讨[J]. 地理科学进展， 2016， 35(7):898-909. doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.07.011 XIE Zhehui, HUANG Heqing, ZHOU Yuanyuan, et al. Progress on the study of fluvial process of wandering rivers and discussion about its channel pattern classification[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(7): 898–909. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.07.011
[13] 孙东坡，刘明潇，张晓雷，等. 冲积性河流河床冲淤调整对洪水泥沙过程的响应——以黄河游荡型河段为例[J]. 水科学进展， 2014， 25(5):668-676. doi:10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2014.05.009 SUN Dongpo, LIU Mingxiao, ZHANG Xiaolei, et al. Alluvial river adjusting response to the flood-sediment process: For the wandering reach of Yellow River as an example[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014, 25(5): 668–676. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2014.05.009
[14] 张红武，赵连军，曹丰生. 游荡河型成因及其河型转化问题的研究[J]. 人民黄河， 1996， 28(10):11-15. ZHANG Hongwu, ZHAO Lianjun, CAO Fengsheng. Research of the cause of formation of wandering river model and its changes[J]. Yellow River, 1996, 28(10): 11–15.
[15] 刘阳平，吴博然，于忠良，等. 辫状河砂岩储层三维地质模型重构技术——以冀东油田高尚堡区块新近系馆陶组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏， 2022， 34(4):159-170. doi:10.12108/yxyqc.20220415 LIU Yangping, WU Boran, YU Zhongliang, et al. Reconstruction of 3D geological model of braided river sandstone reservoirs: A case study of Neogene Guantao Formation in Gaoshangpu Block, Jidong Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(4): 159–170. doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20220415
[16] 文雯，赵晓东，刘晓，等. 南堡凹陷南部物源古近系沙一段沉积特征[J]. 断块油气田， 2017， 24(3):333-336. doi:10.6056/dkyqt201703008 WEN Wen, ZHAO Xiaodong, LIU Xiao, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of southern provenance of Paleogene Sha 1 Member in Nanpu Sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2017, 24(3): 333–336. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt201703008
[17] 兰朝利，何顺利，门成全. 利用岩心或露头的交错层组厚度预测辫状河河道带宽度——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率， 2005， 12(2):16-18. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2005.02.005 LAN Chaoli, HE Shunli, MEN Chengquan. Prediction of braided channel belt width based on cross-stratum sets thickness measurements of cores or outcrops: Taking Sulige Gas Field, Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2005, 12(2): 16-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2005.02.005
[18] 张昌民，尹太举，赵磊，等. 辫状河储层内部建筑结构分析[J]. 地质科技情报， 2013， 32(4):7-13. ZHANG Changmin, YIN Taiju, ZHAO Lei, et al. Reservoir architectural analysis of braided channel[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(4): 7-13.
[19] 印森林，吴胜和，陈恭洋，等. 基于砂砾质辫状河沉积露头隔夹层研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报（自然科学版)， 2014， 36(4):29-36. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.05.27.03 YIN Senlin, WU Shenghe, CHEN Gongyang, et al. A study on intercalation of sand-gravel braided river deposit based on outcrop section[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(4): 29–36. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.05.27.03
[20] 徐中波，申春生，陈玉琨，等. 砂质辫状河储层构型表征及其对剩余油的控制——以渤海海域P油田为例[J]. 沉积学报，2016，34(2):375-385. doi:10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.02.016 XU Zhongbo, SHEN Chunsheng, CHEN Yukun, et al. Architecture characterization for sandy braided river reservoir and controlling factors of remaining oil distribution: A case of P Oilfield (Neogene), Bohai Offshore, China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(2): 375–385. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.02.016
[21] 李顺明，宋新民，蒋有伟，等. 高尚堡油田砂质辫状河储集层构型与剩余油分布[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2011， 38(4):474-482. LI Shunming, SONG Xinmin, JIANG Youwei, et al. Architecture and remaining oil distribution of the sandy braided river reservoir in the Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(4): 474-482.
[22] 林正良，王华，姜华，等. 南堡凹陷馆陶组火山事件及其油气地质意义[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质， 2011， 31(3):79-85. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1140.2011.03079 LIN Zhengliang, WANG Hua, JIANG Hua, et al. Volcanic events at the stage of Guantao Formation in Nanpu Sag and its petroleum geological significance[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2011, 31(3): 79–85. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1140.2011.03079
[23] 梁昌国，王志章，林承焰，等. 松辽盆地扶余油田白垩系泉四段沉积微相研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报（自然科学版)，2008，30(2):69-73. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.02.018 LIANG Changguo, WANG Zhizhang, LIN Chengyan, et al. Sedimentary microfacies of the Q4 Member of Cretaceous in Fuyu Oilfield, Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2008, 30(2): 69–73. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.02.018
[24] 牛博，高兴军，赵应成，等. 古辫状河心滩坝内部构型表征与建模——以大庆油田萨中密井网区为例[J]. 石油学报， 2015， 36(1):89-100. doi:10.7623/syxb201501011 NIU Bo, GAO Xingjun, ZHAO Yingcheng, et al. Architecture characterization and modeling of channel bar in paleobraided river: A case study of dense well pattern area of Sazhong in Daqing Oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 89–100. doi: 10.7623/syxb201501011
[25] 吴胜和，岳大力，刘建民，等. 地下古河道储层构型的层次建模研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学)， 2008， 38(z1):111-121. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2008.z1.014 WU Shenghe, YUE Dali, LIU Jianmin, et al. Hierarchy modeling of subsurface palaeochannel reservoir architecture[J]. Science in China (Series D: Earth Sciences), 2008, 38(z1): 111–121. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2008.z1.014
[26] 吴胜和，翟瑞，李宇鹏. 地下储层构型表征:现状与展望[J]. 地学前缘， 2012， 19(2):15-23. WU Shenghe, ZHAI Rui, LI Yupeng. Subsurface reservoir architecture characterization: Current status and prospects[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2): 15–23.
[27] MIALL A D. Architectural elements and bounding surfaces in fluvial deposits: Anatomy of the Kayenta Formation (Lower Jurassic), southwest Colorado[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1988, 55(3–4): 233–262. doi: 10.1016/0037-0738(88)90133-9
[28] 张可，吴胜和，冯文杰，等. 砂质辫状河心滩坝的发育演化过程探讨——沉积数值模拟与现代沉积分析启示[J]. 沉积学报， 2018， 36(1):81-91. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.010 ZHANG Ke, WU Shenghe, FENG Wenjie, et al. Discussion on evolution of bar in sandy braided river: Insights from sediment numerical simulation and modern bar[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36(1): 81–91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.010
[29] 水利部黄河水利委员会. 黄河泥沙公报2006[R]. 郑州:水利部黄河水利委员会， 2006. Yellow River Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources. Yellow River sediment bulletin 2006[R]. Zhengzhou: Yellow River Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources, 2006.

游荡型辫状河沉积特征及沉积相模式

Characteristics and Sedimentary Facies Model of Wandering Braided Rivers

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘宏, 王双琴, 谭磊, 唐松, 陈聪. 川中龙女寺构造栖霞组薄储层预测地质模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(4): 19-30.
[2]	冯林杰, 蒋裕强, 曹脊翔, 杨长城, 宋林珂. 川中北部须家河组烃源岩测井解释及评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(4): 31-42.
[3]	罗安湘, 刘广林, 刘正鹏, 沈田丹, 马爽. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界断裂及对油藏的控制研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(4): 43-54.
[4]	游君君, 雷明珠, 刘亿, 翟亚楠, 江黎. 珠三拗陷优质烃源岩地震相特征及分布预测[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(4): 55-71.
[5]	卞保力, 刘海磊, 蒋中发, 王学勇, 丁修建. 玛南斜坡风城组油气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(4): 72-84.
[6]	唐洪明, 庞榆, 王锡伟, 赵昱超. 高孔低渗碳酸盐岩孔隙结构及控制因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 1-13.
[7]	黄德榕, 张宪国, 王友净, 蔡国钢, 解宝国. 辽河东部凹陷斜坡带扇三角洲地震沉积学表征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 14-28.
[8]	卞保力, 胡修权, 王学勇, 刘海磊, 程锦翔. 准西车排子凸起下石炭统地层划分及潜力分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 49-60.
[9]	欧成华, 李航, 史百强, 张峙岳, 贺健. 川北典型陆相页岩——砂岩油气潜力表征与评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 61-71.
[10]	肖正录, 路俊刚, 廖建波, 李勇, 陈世加. 白豹—南梁地区长_4+5₁油藏主控因素及富集规律[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(6): 29-42.
[11]	贾怀存, 康洪全, 梁建设, 程涛, 张世鑫. 桑托斯盆地湖相碳酸盐岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 1-9.
[12]	程乐利, 白林坤, 韦少校, 熊亭, 印森林. 北羌塘拗陷巴贡组致密砂岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 10-22.
[13]	谢日彬, 李海涛, 杨勇, 刘远志, 曲长伟. 珠江口盆地礁灰岩储层特征精细表征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 23-35.
[14]	李安琪, 叶绮, 胡德胜, 盖永浩, 徐雪丰. 涠西南凹陷南部斜坡次生油藏成藏模式及启示[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 36-45.
[15]	金芸芸, 石正勇, 任霄宇. 泌阳凹陷下二门地区浅层油气源分析及勘探启示[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 46-53.