西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 89-100.

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

平台不正当竞争软法规制的理论证成及制度改进

陈耿华, 李静   

  1. 西南政法大学经济法学院, 重庆 两江新区 401120
  • 发布日期:2026-06-22
  • 作者简介:陈耿华,西南政法大学经济法学院副教授,博士,研究方向:竞争法。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学后期资助项目“平台不正当竞争的中国规制方案研究”(23JHQ075)。

Theoretical Justification and Institutional Improvement of Soft Regulation on Unfair Competition of Platforms

CHEN Genghua, LI Jing   

  1. School of Economic Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Liangjiang New Area Chongqing, 401120, China
  • Published:2026-06-22

摘要: 随着我国平台经济的快速发展,平台不正当竞争问题日益突出。以反不正当竞争法为主要代表的硬法在规制平台不正当竞争时面临规制依据滞后、规制效果有限和规制手段刚性的困境,难以满足平台不正当竞争的规制需求。对此,平台不正当竞争领域的软法规制因其侧重多元治理、注重协商性与回应性等特性,成为解决我国平台不正当竞争规制问题的重要补充。与此同时,平台不正当竞争的软法规制在实践中也暴露出价值偏好倾向明显、规范间存在冲突以及解纷能力有限等局限。对此,可以从以下几方面予以完善:一是健全平台不正当竞争软法规制的制定程序,包括构建多元利益平衡的软法协商机制、针对不同主体制定差异化的程序规范及保障软法制定过程信息公开;二是促进平台不正当竞争软法体系化建设,包括建立统一的软法分类标准与效力层级、构建多元监督机制以避免软法规范间产生冲突、促进平台不正当竞争的硬法与软法协同;三是优化平台不正当竞争软法解纷能力,包括构建、完善专业化纠纷解决机制、配备专业人员负责纠纷的解决及推进软法的司法化衔接。

关键词: 平台经济, 软法, 不正当竞争, 硬法, 行业自律规范, 网络空间治理

Abstract: With the rapid development of platform economy, issues of unfair competition on platforms have become increasingly prominent in China. Hard law, primarily represented by the anti-unfair competition law, faces challenges in regulating platform unfair competition due to lagging regulatory bases, limited effectiveness, and inflexible regulatory tools, rendering it inadequate to meet regulatory demands. In response, soft law regulation in this domain has emerged as a crucial supplement, leveraging its emphasis on multi-stakeholder governance, consultative approaches, and responsiveness. Concurrently, soft law regulation of platform unfair competition has revealed practical limitations, including value biases, regulatory conflicts, and limited dispute resolution capacity. To address these problems, the following proposals for improvement are put forward. Firstly, the formulation procedures for soft law regulating platform unfair competition needs to be refined, which entails establishing a multi-stakeholder consultation mechanism for balancing interests, developing differentiated procedural norms for distinct entities, and ensuring transparency throughout the soft law formulation process. Second, the systematic development of soft law for platform unfair competition needs to be promoted, including establishing unified classification standards and hierarchy of effectiveness for soft law, constructing multi-stakeholder oversight mechanisms to prevent conflicts between soft law norms, and enhancing coordination between hard law and soft law in this domain. Third, the dispute resolution capacity of soft law for platform unfair competition needs to be optimised, including establishing and improving specialised dispute resolution mechanisms, appointing professional personnels to handle disputes, and advancing judicial integration of soft law.

Key words: platform economy, soft law, unfair competition, hard law, industry self-regulation standards, cyberspace governance

中图分类号: