基于CDP及界面分离准则的水泥环完整性研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2024.11.02.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究交变压力下水泥环完整性失效过程和破坏形式，采用单（三）轴及循环载荷下水泥石应力-应变本构及力学参数实验结果建立生产套管-水泥环-技术套管三维力学模型，利用全尺寸失效实验分析验证水泥环在交变压力下的力学响应；采用CDP和界面分离准则分别模拟分析水泥环本体完整性和界面完整性。结果表明，水泥环本体损伤程度随压力峰值和循环次数的增加而增大，且拉伸损伤增长速率高于压缩损伤，拉伸损伤值达到最大值后，压缩损伤值随循环次数增加而继续增大，裂纹继续扩展；随着压力峰值的增大，损伤萌生及演变形成微环隙所需循环次数逐渐减少。压力峰值和循环次数增加均会导致水泥环完整性损伤，但压力峰值影响更大，直接破坏其完整性，循环次数是加剧损伤并演变至失效；水泥石的脆性特征及拉压强度差异是损伤程度增长速率出现差异的关键因素。

关键词: 交变压力, 水泥环完整性, 扩展有限元法, Cohesive单元法, 双线性牵引-分离准则

Abstract: To investigate the failure process and damage form of cement sheath integrity under alternating pressure, the experimental results of the stress-strain ontological relationship and mechanical parameters of cement stone under uni/triaxial and cyclic loading are used to establish a three-dimensional mechanical model of the“production casing-cement sheath-technical casing” under alternating pressure. The mechanical response under alternating pressure was analyzed and verified by using full-size cement sheath integrity failure experiments. The CDP and interfacial separation criterion were used to simulate and analyse the cement sheath body integrity and interfacial integrity respectively. The results show that the degree of damage to the cement body increases with both peak pressure and the number of cycles, and the growth rate of tensile damage is higher. After the tensile damage value reaches its maximum value, the compressive damage value continues to increase as the number of cycles increases, and the cracks continue to extend. As the peak of pressure increases, the number of cycles required is gradually decreases for interfacial integrity damage to sprout and its evolution to form a micro-annular gap. The increase in the peak of pressure and the cycle times can both lead to damage to the integrity of the cement sheath, but the impact of the peak of pressure is more significant, directly damaging its integrity, while the cycle times further exacerbate the integrity damage and evolve into failure. The brittle characteristics of cementite and differences in tensile and compressive strengths are key factors in the differences in the rate of growth of damage.

Key words: alternating pressure, cement sheath integrity, XFEM, Cohesive element, bilinear traction-separation criterion

中图分类号:

TE256

邓宽海, 罗开怀, 刘乔平, 宋维春, 周念涛, AL-SHAIBANI S I, 张敬逸. 基于CDP及界面分离准则的水泥环完整性研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 48(3): 165-177.

DENG Kuanhai, LUO Kaihuai, LIU Qiaoping, SONG Weichun, ZHOU Niantao, AL-SHAIBANI Sinan Ihsan, ZHANG Jingyi. Simulation of Cement Sheath Integrity Based on the CDP and the Interface Separation Criterion[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2026, 48(3): 165-177.

参考文献

[1] 丁士东，陆沛青，郭印同，等. 复杂环境下水泥环全生命周期密封完整性研究进展与展望[J]. 石油钻探技术， 2023， 51（4）: 104-113. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2023076 DING Shidong, LU Peiqing, GUO Yintong, et al. Progress and prospect on the study of full life cycle sealing integrity of cement sheath in complex environments[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51（4）: 104-113. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2023076
[2] LIU Kui, DING Shidong, ZHOU Shiming, et al. Study on preapplied annulus backpressure increasing the sealing ability of cement sheath in shale gas wells[C]. SPE 205360-PA, 2021. doi: 10.2118/205360-PA
[3] TIAN Yudong, LIU Gonghui, QI Yue, et al. A cementing technology for shale oil horizontal wells[J]. Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 2023, 19(11): 2837-2845. doi: 10.32604/FDMP.2023.028805
[4] 高显束，王晶，王敏，等. 交变载荷下固井水泥环完整性研究[J]. 中国建材科技， 2022， 31（3）: 28-30. doi: 10.12164/j.issn.1003-8965.2022.03.007 GAO Xianshu, WANG Jing, WANG Min, et al. Study on integrity of cement sheath under alternating loads[J]. China Building Materials Science & Technology, 2022, 31(3): 28-30. doi: 10.12164/j.issn.1003-8965.2022.03.007
[5] ZHOU Shiming, LIU Rengguang, ZENG Hao, et al. Mechanical characteristics of well cement under cyclic loading and its influence on the integrity of shale gas wellbores[J]. Fuel, 2019, 250: 132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.131
[6] 杨广国，刘奎，曾夏茂，等. 页岩气井套管内压周期变化对水泥环密封失效的实验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程， 2021， 21（13）: 5311-5317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.13.019 YANG Guangguo, LIU Kui, ZENG Xiamao, et al. Experimental analysis and discussion on cement sheath failure caused by the varied casing internal pressure in shale gas wells[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(13): 5311-5317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.13.019
[7] LI Juan, SU Donghua, TANG Shizhong, et al. Deformation and damage of cement sheath in gas storage wells under cyclic loading[J]. Energy Science & Engineering, 2021, 9(4): 483-501. doi: 10.1002/ESE3.869
[8] YANG Heng, BU Yuhuan, GUO Shenglai, et al. Effects of in-situ stress and elastic parameters of cement sheath in salt rock formation of underground gas storage on seal integrity of cement sheath[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 123. doi: 10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2021.105258
[9] GHEIBI S, AGOFACK N, SANGESLAND S. Modified discrete element method (MDEM) as a numerical tool for cement sheath integrity in wells[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 196. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107720
[10] PARK K, PAULINO G H, ROESLER J. Cohesive fracture model for functionally graded fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(6): 956-965. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.004
[11] GOLEWSKI G L, GOLEWSKI P, SADOWSKI T. Numerical modelling crack propagation under Mode II fracture in plain concretes containing siliceous fly-ash additive using XFEM method[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2012, 62: 75-78. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012. 05.009
[12] SAHMARAN M, LI V C. Engineered cementitious composites: can composites be accepted as crack-free concrete?[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010, 2164(1): 1-8. doi: 10.3141/2164-01
[13] 李彩霞. 基于扩展有限元法的裂纹扩展分析研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学， 2015. LI Caixia. Analysis of crack propagation based on the extended finite element method[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015.
[14] 杨涛，邹道勤. 基于XFEM的钢筋混凝土梁开裂数值模拟[J]. 浙江大学学报（工学版）， 2013， 47（3）: 495-501. YANG Tao, ZOU Daoqin. Numerical simulation of erack growth ofreinforced concrete beam based on XFEM[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Seience), 2013, 47(3): 495-501.
[15] GUO Shenglai, BU Yuhuan, YANG Xin, et al. Effect of casing internal pressure on integrity of cement ring in marine shallow formation based on XFEM[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 108: 104-258. doi: 10.1016/ j.engfailanal.2019.104258
[16] 韦奇. 高温高压气井套管水泥环密封完整性研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2019. doi: 10.27420/d.cnki.gxsyc. 2019.000863 WEI Qi. Research on seal integrity of casing cement sheath in high temperature and high pressure gas wells[D]. Chengdu: SouthWest Petroleum University, 2019. doi: 10.27420/d.cnki.gxsyc.2019.000863
[17] 席岩，李军，陶谦，等. 循环载荷作用下微环隙的产生及演变[J]. 断块油气田， 2020， 27（4）: 522-527. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202004024 XI Yan, LI Jun, TAO Qian, et al. Emergence and evolution of micro-annulus under cyclic loading[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2020, 27(4): 522-527. doi: 10.6056/ dkyqt202004024
[18] 刘硕琼，李德旗，袁进平，等. 页岩气井水泥环完整性研究[J]. 天然气工业， 2017， 37（7）: 76-82. doi: 10. 3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.07.011 LIU Shuoqiong, LI Deqi, YUAN Jinping, et al. Cement sheath integrity of shale gas wells: A case study from the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(7): 76-82. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.07.011
[19] 隋晓凤. 储气库井环空带压机制及水泥环密封完整性分析[D]. 黑龙江: 东北石油大学, 2023. doi: 10.26995/ d.cnki.gdqsc.2023.001156 SUI Xiaofeng. Analysis of annular pressure mechanism and cement sheath sealing integrity of gas storage wells[D]. Heilongjiang: Northeast Petroleum University, 2023. doi: 10.26995/d.cnki.gdqsc.2023.001156
[20] 范明涛，李社坤，李军，等. 深层页岩气水泥环界面密封失效机理研究[J]. 石油机械， 2021， 49（1）: 53-57. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2021.01.008 FAN Mingtao, LI Shekun, LI Jun, et al. Study on the sealing failure mechanism of cement sheath interface in deep shale gas wells[J]. China Petroleum machinery, 2021, 49(1): 53-57. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2021. 01.008
[21] 席岩，王海涛，李军，等. 循环载荷对水泥环密封性影响试验与数值研究[J]. 石油机械， 2021， 49（2）: 88-93. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2021.02.014 XI Yan, WANG Haitao, LI Jun, et al. Experimental study and numerical analysis of the influence of cyclic loading on the cement sheath sealing performance[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2021, 49(2): 88-93. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2021.02.014
[22] JIANG Jiwei, CHEN Zhixue, HAO Weiwei, et al. Numerical simulation research on seal failure of remedial cement sheath in oil and gas wells[C]. Cham: International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences, 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-02097-1_14
[23] DENG Kuanhai, ZHOU Niantao, LIN Yuanhua, et al. Failure mechanism and influencing factors of cement sheath integrity under alternating pressure[J]. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(4): 2413-2427. doi: 10.1016/J.PETSCI.2023.03.004
[24] WANG Yangang, FENG Yongcun, ZHAO Yingxiao, et al. Experimental study on cement sheath integrity of UGS wells under cyclic loading[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, 239: 212958. doi: 10.1016/J.GEOEN.2024.212958
[25] DENG Kuanhai, ZHOU Niantao, LIN Yuanhua, et al. Failure mechanism and control method of cement sheath sealing integrity under alternating thermal-stress coupling in geothermal wells[J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 232: 120875. doi: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2024.120448
[26] WANG W, TALEGHANI A D. Three-dimensional analysis of cement sheath integrity around Wellbores[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2014, 121: 38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.05.024
[27] 蒋记伟，李军，柳贡慧，等. 基于Cohesive单元法的弃置井水泥塞-套管界面胶结失效数值模拟[J]. 钻井液与完井液， 2020， 37（3）: 351-357. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.03.014 JIANG Jiwei, LI Jun, LIU Gonghui, et al. Numerical simulation of failed bonding between cement plug and casing string in abandoned wells based on cohesive element method[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(3): 351-357. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.03.014
[28] BOIS A P, VU MH, NOËL K, et al. Evaluating cementplug mechanical and hydraulic integrity[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion 191335-PA, 2019, 34(2): 92-102. doi: 10.2118/191335-PA
[29] 范明涛，李社坤，李军，等. 多级压裂水泥环界面密封失效数值模拟[J]. 科学技术与工程， 2019， 19（24）: 107-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.24.017 FAN Mingtao, LI Shekun, LI Jun, et al. Numerical simulation of interface seal failure of cement sheath during multi-stage fracturing[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(24): 107-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.24.017
[30] 王坎盛，沈珉，于济菘. 界面应力传递重新分析及Cohesive模型参数的确定[J]. 材料科学与工程学报, 2017, 35(6): 945-951. doi: 10.14136/j.cnki.issn1673-2812.2017.06.017 WANG Kansheng, SHEN Min, YU Jisong. Re-analysis of interface stress transfers and parameter evaluation for cohesive zone model[J]. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 35(6): 945-951. doi: 10.14136/j.cnki.issn1673-2812.2017.06.017
[31] 李录贤，王铁军. 扩展有限元法（XFEM）及其应用[J]. 力学进展， 2005， 35（1）: 5-20. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.2005.01.002 LI Luxian, WANG Tiejun. The extended finite element method and its applications[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2005, 35(1): 5-20. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.2005.01.002
[32] 张战廷，刘宇锋. ABAQUS中的混凝土塑性损伤模型[J]. 建筑结构， 2011， 41（S2）: 229-231. ZHANG Zhanting, LIU Yufeng. Concrete damaged plasticity model in ABAQUS[J]. Building Structure, 2011, 41(S2): 229-231.
[33] 初纬，沈吉云，杨云飞，等. 连续变化内压下套管-水泥环围岩组合体微环隙计算[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2015， 42（3）: 379-385. doi: 10.11698/PED.2015.03.16 CHU Wei, SHEN Juyun, YANG Yunfei, et al. Calculation of micro-annulus size in casing-cement sheathformation system under continuous internal casing pressure change[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(3): 379-385. doi: 10.11698/PED.2015.03.16
[34] 初永涛，刘奎，蒋新立，等. 循环载荷对高温环境水泥石微观结构及力学性能的影响[J]. 石油钻探技术， 2025， 53（4）: 55-64. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2025071 CHU Yongchun, LIU Kui, JIANG Xinli, et al. Effect of cyclic loading on mechanical properties and microstructure of cement stone in high-temperature environments[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2025， 53(4): 55-64. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2025071