大理大学学报

• 教育学-心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生特质无聊现状调查与分析

赵旭艳   

  1. 营口理工学院思政部
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-24 修回日期:2016-11-16 出版日期:2017-03-15 发布日期:2017-03-15
  • 作者简介:赵旭艳,讲师,主要从事高校思想政治教育、大学生心理健康教育研究.
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省教育厅高校思想政治工作研究专项项目“大学生无聊倾向的成因分析与干预机制”(ZS2014025)

Investigation and Analysis of Boredom Proneness for College Students

Zhao Xuyan   

  1. Department of Ideology and Politics, Yingkou Institute of Technology,
  • Received:2016-06-24 Revised:2016-11-16 Online:2017-03-15 Published:2017-03-15

摘要: 采用张世泽等修编的大学生无聊倾向问卷,对14所高校的1 813名在校大学生进行问卷调查,进而深入了解大学生特
质无聊的现状,为大学生特质无聊性研究提供实证性依据。通过调查发现,男生比女生更容易产生特质无聊;农村生源大学生
特质无聊总分显著高于城镇生源大学生;大四学生特质无聊总分显著高于其他三个年级学生;高职高专院校学生特质无聊总
分及外部刺激维度得分显著高于重点院校学生,普通本科院校学生与重点院校学生的特质无聊总分及两个维度得分不存在显
著差异;独生子女大学生与非独生子女大学生特质无聊总分不存在显著差异。

Abstract: 1,813 college students from 14 universities were survey by using Boredom Proneness Questionnaire for College Students
(BPQ)revised by Zhang Shize for understanding the current situation of boredom proneness for college students and providing
empirical basis for research. According to the survey, male students got higher scores than female students on boredom proneness;
college students from rural areas had higher scores on boredom proneness than college students from cities; senior student had higher
scores on boredom proneness than other three grade students; the students of higher vocational colleges got higher scores than the
students of key universities on boredom proneness and external stimulus dimension; there are not significant differences between
college students from normal undergraduate university and the students from key universities on the scores of boredom proneness and
two dimensions; only-child students and non-only-child students do not exist significant differences on scores of boredom proneness.