大理大学学报

• 马克思主义理论-哲学 • 上一篇    下一篇

史学范式与中共党史研究的学术化进程

  

  1. 安徽农业大学经济技术学院,合肥230013
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-26 修回日期:2018-03-27 出版日期:2018-07-15 发布日期:2018-07-15
  • 作者简介:汪兵,讲师,主要从事中共党史与党的建设研究
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省教育厅高校优秀青年人才支持计划项目“张静如与中共党史研究”(gxyq2017149)

The Paradigm of Historiography and the Academization of the History of the Communist Party of China

  1. College of Economics and Technology, Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei 230013, China
  • Received:2018-02-26 Revised:2018-03-27 Online:2018-07-15 Published:2018-07-15

摘要: 改革开放以来,中共党史研究的理论和方法领域不断涌现一批专著和论文。其中,在党史学范式研究方面,党史学界
积极引入和提出了多个史学范式,并将史学范式运用于研究的实践中。研究者要重视对党史学范式的探讨,积极吸收史学界
有关研究成果,改造和创建符合党史研究实际的若干史学范式,深化党史学理论和方法研究。这方面问题研究的重要意义体
现在:丰富党史学范式理论研究的内容、提升党史研究的学术化思维以及为完善党史学的中介理论体系指明方向。

关键词: 中共党史, 理论与方法, 史学范式, 学术化, 进程

Abstract: Since the reform and opening up, a number of monographs and papers have been emerged continuously on the research
theories and methods of the history of the Communist Party of China. Among them, in the research of the party history paradigm, the
party history academic circle has actively introduced and proposed a number of historical paradigms, and applied the historical
paradigm to the practice of research. Researchers should pay attention to the exploration of the paradigm of party history, actively
absorb relevant research achievements of the historiographical circle, transform and create several historical paradigms that are
consistent with the facts of party history research, and deepen the research on theories and methods of party history. The significance of
research in this area is reflected in enriching the content of the research on the theory of the party history paradigm, improving the
academic thinking in the study of party history, and specifying the direction of the intermediary theory system for party history.

Key words: the History of CPC, theories and methods, historical paradigm, academic, progress