西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)

• 社会学 • 上一篇    下一篇

互联网反垄断中相关市场界定解析——以“奇虎360诉腾讯案”为视角

陈国强   

  1. 四川大学法学院,四川 成都 610207
  • 出版日期:2014-09-01 发布日期:2014-09-01
  • 作者简介:陈国强(1989-),男(汉族),四川宜宾人,硕士研究生,研究方向:经济法学

Analysis of Relevant Market Definition in Internet Anti-Monopoly———From perspective of "Qihoo 360 v. Tencent Case"

CHEN Guo-qiang   

  1. Sichuan university school of law, ChenDu, Sichuan,610207,China
  • Online:2014-09-01 Published:2014-09-01

摘要:

本文以“奇虎360诉腾讯案”为切入点,论述了互联网行业具有创新迅速、传播速度快、市场双边性、产品低费用甚至免费等特征,这导致了传统反垄断中对相关市场的界定方法用于互联网相关市场界定时存在很多缺陷以致无法适用,而我国互联网反垄断实务也面临一些困境,对此提出了解决方法,即从互联网相关市场包括互联网相关产品市场、互联网相关地域市场、互联网相关时间市场三个维度加以考虑,只有在结合互联网市场特性及互联网产品特性的基础上,才能准确界定互联网相关市场,进而指导我国的互联网反垄断实务,以期保持互联网市场竞争公平、自由、有序地进行。

关键词: 互联网市场, 互联网市场竞争, 互联网反垄断, 互联网相关市场界定, 奇虎360诉腾讯案

Abstract:

From perspective of “Qihoo360”v.Tencent case, the paper presents Internet industry boast following features: rapid Innovation and spread, two-sided market, and cheap or free product, all these caused existing anti-monopoly has become inapplicable for Internet relevant market definition, on the other hand, there are some problems in Internet anti-monopoly practices in China.This paper proposes a solution, that is, from Internet-related markets including Internet-related products market, the Internet relevant geographic market and Internet-related time market three dimensions to be considered. Only the combination of Internet -based market characteristics and product features, can accurately define the relevant Internet market, and thus guide Internet antitrust practices in order to maintain fair competition, freedom and orderly manner in the Internet market.

Key words: Internet market, Internet market competition, Internet anti-monopoly, Internet-relevant market definition, Qihoo 360 v. Tencent case