西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 65-70.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.06.25.01

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

对责任转质的再检讨#br# ——兼论我国责任转质制度的构建

崔明亮   

  1. 崔明亮
  • 出版日期:2015-05-01 发布日期:2015-05-01
  • 作者简介:崔明亮(1988 –),男(汉族),河南郑州人,硕士研究生,研究方向:民商法方向。

A Review of the Responsibility Sub-pledge#br# ——A Discussion on the Construction of China’s Responsible Sub-pledge System

Cui Ming - liang   

  1. Cui Ming - liang
  • Online:2015-05-01 Published:2015-05-01

摘要:

转质制度在日耳曼法时期已初现端倪,其可分为承诺转质与责任转质。相较于承诺转质,责任转质由于其本
身的复杂性以及对“意思自治”的挑战,一直是理论与实践中争议的焦点。我国现行立法对于责任转质未作出明确规
定,忽略了责任转质的客观存在,这种现状容易滋生以下流弊:忽视现实中常有的责任转质现象的存在,可能导致在各
方当事人中利益保护的失衡;承诺转质固有的局限性使其往往处于虚置的位置;不利于“物尽其用”,因而妨碍社会整
体经济福利的增进。面对责任转质在实践中的客观存在与立法上缺位的困境,引入责任转质制度是我国未来立法的
应然选择。

关键词: 质权, 转质, 责任转质, 承诺转质, 善意第三人

Abstract:

The sub-pledge system first emerged in the early Germanic period and it can be divided into sub-pledge by acceptance
and responsible sub-pledge. Different from the sub-pledge by acceptance,responsible sub-pledge has been the focus of
controversy in theory and practice because of its complexity and challenge to the“autonomy”. The current legislation in China
ignored the existence of responsible sub-pledge and has not made clear provision for responsible sub-pledge,which breeds
the following problems: ignoring the usual existence of responsible sub-pledge in reality could lead to imbalance in interests
protection for all parties;the inherent limitations of sub-pledge by acceptance often place itself in a false position;it’s not
conducive to the principle of“make the best use of everything”and hinder the improvement of overall economic benefits in
society. Introducing the responsible sub-pledge system is an appropriate choice for China’s future legislation in the face of the
existence of responsible sub-pledge and the lack of relevant legislation.

Key words: sub-pledge, responsible sub-pledge, sub-pledge by acceptance, bona-fide third purchaser