西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wu Li - lin Yao Dan
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
With quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interview methods,we surveyed junior university students from four colleges in Changsha and Wuhan,trying to find out whether there are differences in language analytic abilities between the high score group and the low group and what the differences are. The results of the study indicate there are some significant differences in understanding / application of lexical meaning,lexical morphology,understanding /application of sentence meaning, and in syntax between the high score group and the low group students,and hence significant differences in total value of language analysis ability. Among these four aspects,understanding /application of lexical meaning and lexical morphology are significantly different. Qualitative interviews verify the differences reflected by questionnaire. In conclusion,high-score and low-score group students display different tendencies in language analytic abilities. Therefore,language learners should determine effective and suitable methods of learning according to their own characteristics in each aspect.
Key words: language analytic ability, high/low scores grouping, differences in language analysis ability, combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, understanding/application of lexical meaning, lexical morphology
Wu Li - lin Yao Dan. An Investigation into the Differences of Language Analytic Ability Between High-score and Low-score Student Groups[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.10.12.02.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.10.12.02
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2015/V17/I2/104
[1] Skehan P. A cognitive approach to language learning[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language EducationPress, 1998:186 – 235.[2] 魏耀章. 中国英语学习者语法敏感性与阅读理解水平的相关研究[J]. 外语界,2005(1):40 – 46.[3] 李芍. 中国英语学生英语语法敏感性与阅读理解能力相关性研究[D]. 成都:四川大学,2007.[4] 周春艳. 语法敏感性对英语阅读理解的影响[J]. 黑龙江科技信息,2010(30):228.[5] 蔡文斌. 英语语法敏感性与听力理解能力的相关性研究[J]. 安徽职业技术学院学报,2010(4):78 – 80.[6] 刘涛, 刘利民, 邓隽. 语言学能倾向中语法敏感性测验指标的相关系数法研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报:人文社科版,2005(10):286 – 289.[7] 苏建红. 显性/隐性教学与语言分析能力对二语知识习得的交互作用[J]. 现代外语,2012(4):385 – 392.[8] 李兰荣. 外语学能之语言分析能力试题的开发、试测与效度研究[J]. 山东外语教学,2013(1):68 – 74.[9] 苏建红. 思维方式与元语言知识关系实证研究语言分析能力的中介作用[J]. 外语教学,2012(1):61 – 65.[10] Carroll J B,Sapon S.1959/2002(Form A)Modern languageaptitude test(MLAT)[R]. New York:The PsychologicalCorporation Language Testing Inc,2002.[11] Pimsleur P. The pimselur language aptitude battery[M].New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1966.[12] Grigorenko E L,Sternberg R J,Ehrman M. A theorybasedapproach to the measurement of foreign languageaptitude:the CANAL-F theory and test[J].Modern LanguageJournal,2000(3):390 – 405.[13] Masamichi Mochizuki,Kazumi Aizawa. An affix acquisitionorder for EFL learners[J]. Exploratory Study System,2000,28:291 – 304.[14] 秦晓晴. 第二语言学习动机研究及其存在的问题[J]. 外语教学,2003(3):16 – 19.