西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 86-89.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.01.016
Previous Articles Next Articles
YE Xiao-li
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
With the rapid development of society,increasing number of lawsuits are filed concerning the forming rights. In order to protect the judges,the courts usually reject or suspend considering such cases in the name of “No Stipulation in Explicit Terms”. However,to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and to exert the function of law in maintaining social order,the court should decide whether or not to consider a case based on the interests of action. In method,the court should decide whether specific forming rights have any legal basis in terms of substantive law through law hermeneutics,right stratification theory and judgment about illegality. Institutionally,the court should establish effective case guiding system to guide the practice of judicial judgment and form a consistent judicial standard.
Key words: forming rights, judicial response, interest of action, judgment about illegality, case guiding system
YE Xiao-li. Judicial Response to the Forming Rights[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 16(1): 86-89.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.01.016
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2014/V16/I1/86
[1]左卫民.诉讼权研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2003:75.[2]廖永安.我国民事诉讼主管范围之问题评析[J].现代法学,2005(01):132-138.[3][日]新堂幸司.新民事诉讼法[M].林剑峰,译.北京:法律出版社,2008:177.[4]王福华.两大法系中诉的利益理论的程序价值[J].法律科学,2000(05):87-97.[5][德] 卡尔.拉伦茨.法学方法论[M].陈爱娥,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003:249.[6]胡岩.“祭奠权”的法学方法论反思[J].法律适用,2012(06):112-115.[7][日]谷口安平.程序的正义与诉讼[M].王亚新,刘荣军,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996:160.[8]马桦,朱呈义.侵权责任中违法性的判断[J].当代法学,2007,21(03):40-44.[9]张金海.侵害一般人格权行为的违法性判断[J].法学杂志,2009(08):124-126.[10]李承亮.侵权行为违法性的判断标准[J].法学评论,2011(02):77-84.[11]袁定波.新型案件给传统审判带来挑战[N].法制日报,2008-11-05(5).[12]王利明.我国案例指导制度若干问题研究[J].法学,2012(01):71-80.