华庆地区长6致密油储层微观孔喉结构特征

doi:10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.03.28.03

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 36-46.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.03.28.03

华庆地区长6致密油储层微观孔喉结构特征

徐黎明¹, 牛小兵¹, 梁晓伟¹, 陈亚娟², 马继业¹

1. 中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 陕西西安 710018;
2. 北京金谷干线石油科技有限公司, 北京海淀 100083

收稿日期:2016-03-28 修回日期:2017-03-31 出版日期:2017-08-01 发布日期:2017-08-01
通讯作者: 徐黎明,E-mail:xuliming_cq@163.com
作者简介:徐黎明,1962年生,男,汉族,浙江衢州人,教授级高级工程师,博士,主要从事石油勘探综合地质研究工作。E-mail:xuliming_cq@163.com;牛小兵,1978年生,男,汉族,甘肃会宁人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事石油地质方面的研究工作。E-mail:nxb_cq@petrochina.com.cn;梁晓伟,1978年生,男,汉族,陕西长武人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事石油地质方面的研究工作。E-mail:liangxw_cq@petrochina.com.cn;陈亚娟,1975年生,女,汉族,新疆奎屯人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事石油地质方面的研究工作。E-mail:cyjc2006@163.com;马继业,1985年生,女,汉族,甘肃镇原人,工程师,硕士,主要从事油藏评价方面的研究工作。E-mail:mjye_cq@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41390451）；国家"973"项目（2014CB239003）；国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05046）

Microscopic Characteristics of Pore-throat Structures of the Chang 6 Member Tight Oil Layer in the Huaqing Region

XU Liming¹, NIU Xiaobing¹, LIANG Xiaowei¹, CHEN Yajuan², MA Jiye¹

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
2. Beijing Route Geumgok Oil Technology Development Co., Ltd., Haidian, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-03-28 Revised:2017-03-31 Online:2017-08-01 Published:2017-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区三叠系延长组长6段致密油储层，应用恒速压汞和微、纳米CT扫描分析等技术手段和方法，开展了微观孔喉结构特征研究。研究结果表明，长6致密油储层孔隙以微米级孔隙为主，纳米级孔隙分布频率较低，主流喉道半径为1.07 μm，平均喉道半径为0.84 μm；平均孔隙半径为140.12 μm，平均孔喉比为281.03，微纳米孔喉特征明显。喉道半径、孔喉比与孔渗关系表明，孔喉特征是影响和制约储层物性的关键因素，孔喉特征参数对渗透率的影响和制约要明显高于其对孔隙度的影响。致密油储层微纳米CT实验表明，致密油储层发育孔喉网络复杂的纳米微米级孔喉系统，且具连通性；微纳米孔隙结构三维重构显示，纳米孔隙一般呈椭圆形、长条形和不规则形，微米级孔隙呈现圆形、椭圆形、三角形和不规则形，石油赋存在较大孔隙的团块状、球形斑点状孔隙结构和微裂缝中。

关键词: 致密油储层, 微观孔喉结构, 长6储层, 华庆地区, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract: Structural characteristics of microscopic pore-throats of the Chang 6 Member tight oil layer of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Huaqing Region, Ordos Basin were studied using techniques including constant-speed pumping and microand nano-CT scanning. Results show that the pore spaces in the Chang 6 Member were predominantly microscopic, while nanoscopic pore spaces were less dominant. The mainstream throat radius was 1.07 μm, average throat radius was 0.84 μm, and pore radius was 140.12 μm. The average pore-to-throat ratio was 281.03, representing significant micro/nanoscopic porethroat characteristics. The relationships of pore infiltration with throat radius and pore-to-throat ratio show that pore-throat characteristics are the key factors that influence the physical properties of the tight oil layer. The effects and limitations of porethroat parameters on infiltration rate are more significant than those of porosity. Micro/nano-CT scans on tight oil layers indicate the presence of complex and interconnected micro/nanoscopic pore-throat networks. The three-dimensional reconstruction of micro/nanoscopic pore space reveals that nanoscopic pores are mainly oval, elongated, or irregular, whereas their microscopic counterparts are circular, oval, triangular, and irregular. Tight oil is located in micro-cracks and in the clustered and spherical pore-throat structures with relatively larger pore spaces.

Key words: tight oil layer, microscopic pore-throat structure, Chang 6 Member oil layer, Huaqing Region, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.3

徐黎明, 牛小兵, 梁晓伟, 陈亚娟, 马继业. 华庆地区长6致密油储层微观孔喉结构特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 36-46.

XU Liming, NIU Xiaobing, LIANG Xiaowei, CHEN Yajuan, MA Jiye. Microscopic Characteristics of Pore-throat Structures of the Chang 6 Member Tight Oil Layer in the Huaqing Region[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 36-46.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.03.28.03

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2017/V39/I4/36

参考文献

[1] 郑荣才,文华国,韩永林,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6油层组湖底滑塌浊积扇沉积特征及其研究意义[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 33(6):566-575. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2006.06.004 ZHENG Rongcai, WEN Huaguo, HAN Yonglin, et al. Discovery and significance of sublacustrine slump turbidite fans in Chang 6 oil bearing formation of Baibao region in Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2006, 33(6):566-575. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2006.06.-004
[2] 黄军平,杨占龙,马国福,等. 中国小型断陷湖盆致密油地质特征及勘探潜力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(9):1763-1772. doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.09.1763 HUANG Junping, YANG Zhanlong, MA Guofu, et al. The Geological characteristics and exploration potential of tight oil in small fault-subsided lake basins, China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(9):1763-1772. doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.09.1763
[3] 于兴河,李顺利,杨志浩. 致密砂岩气储层的沉积成岩成因机理探讨与热点问题[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(1):113. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.01.001 YU Xinghe, LI Shunli, YANG Zhihao. Discussion on deposition-diagenesis genetic mechanism and hot issues of tight sandstone gas reservoir[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(1):1-13. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.-01.001
[4] 刘昊伟,郑兴远,陈全红,等. 华庆地区长6深水沉积低渗透砂岩储层特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(1):21-26. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2010.01.004 LIU Haowei, ZHENG Xingyuan, CHEN Quanhong, et al. Analysis on characteristics of deep-water sedimentary tight sandstone reservoir of Chang 6 in Huaqing area[J]. Journal of southwest petroleum university (Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 32(1):21-26. doi:10.3863/j.-issn.1674-5086.2010.01.004
[5] 李凤杰,王多云,郑希民. 陕甘宁盆地华池地区延长组缓坡带三角洲前缘的微相构成[J]. 沉积学报, 2002, 20(4):582-587. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.-2002.04.008 LI Fengjie, WANG Duoyun, ZHENG Ximin. The microfacies architecture of delta front along Gentle Slope Zone of Yanchang Formation in Huachi Area, Shaanxi-GansuNingxia Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2002, 20(4):582-587. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2002.04.-008
[6] 田景春,陈高武,窦伟坦,等. 湖泊三角洲前缘砂体成因组合形式和分布规律以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬白豹地区三叠系延长组为例[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):636-640. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2004.06.013 TIAN Jingchun, CHEN Gaowu, DOU Weitan, et al. Origin and association types of lake delta front sandstones and their distribution patterns of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2004, 31(6):636-640. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2004.06.-013
[7] 师调调,孙卫,张创,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区延长组长6储层成岩相及微观孔隙结构[J]. 现代地质, 2012, 26(4):769-777. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.-2012.04.019 SHI Tiaotiao, SUN Wei, ZHANG Chuang, et al. Diagenetic facies and micro-pore structure of Chang 6 reservoir in Yanchang Formation, Huaqing area, Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(4):769-777. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2012.04.019
[8] 傅强,李益. 鄂尔多斯盆地晚三叠系延长组长8长7油层组高分辨率层序地层格架及其地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2006, 20(4):579-584. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2006.04.008 FU Qiang, LI Yi. The high-resolution sequence stratigraphy framework and its geological significance of Triassic Yanchang Formation Ch8-Ch7, Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2006, 20(4):579-584. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2006.04.008
[9] 付金华,郭正权,邓秀芹. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南地区上三叠统延长组沉积相及石油地质意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2005, 7(1):34-44. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.-2005.01.004 FU Jinhua, GUO Zhengquan, DENG Xiuqin. Sedimentary facies of the Yanchang Formation of Upper Triassic and petroleum geological implication in southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2005, 7(1):34-44. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2005.01.004
[10] 卢龙飞,史基安,蔡进功,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田三叠系延长组浊流沉积及成因模式[J]. 地球学报, 2006, 27(4):303309. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.-2006.04.003 LU Longfei, SHI Ji'an, CAI Jingong, et al. Triassic turbidity current deposit and genetic model of Yanchang Formation of Xifeng Oilfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2006, 27(4):303-309. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2006.04.003
[11] 王起琮,李文厚,赵虹,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部三叠系延长组一段湖相浊积岩特征及意义[J]. 地质科学,2006,41(1):54-63. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.-2006.01.006 WANG Qizong, LI Wenhou, ZHAO Hong, et al. Characteristics and significance of lacustrine turbidites in the Member 1 of Yanchang Formation, Upper Triassic in the southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2006, 41(1):54-63. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2006.-01.006
[12] 武富礼,李文厚,李玉宏,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组三角洲沉积及演化[J]. 古地理学报,2004,6(3):307-315. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2004.03.005 WU Fuli, LI Wenhou, LI Yuhong, et al. Delta sediments and evolution of the Yanchang Formation of Upper Triassic in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2004, 6(3):307-315. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2004.03.-005
[13] 窦伟坦,田景春,王峰,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长6油层组储集砂岩成岩作用及其对储层性质的影响[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 36(2):153-158. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2009.02.008 DOU Weitan, TIAN Jingchun, WANG Feng, et al. Diagenesis and its influence on the reservoir quality of Member 6 of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation oil reservoirs in Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2009, 36(2):153-158. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2009.02.008
[14] 高辉,解伟,杨建鹏,等. 基于恒速压汞技术的特低超低渗砂岩储层微观孔喉特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2011, 33(2):206-211, 214. doi:10.3969/j.issn.-1001-6112.2011.02.019 GAO Hui, XIE Wei, YANG Jianpeng, et al. Pore throat characteristics of extra-ultra low permeability sandstone reservoir based on constant-rate mercury penetration technique[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2011, 33(2):206-211, 214. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2011.02.019
[15] 李卫成,张艳梅,王芳,等. 应用恒速压汞技术研究致密油储层微观孔喉特征以鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(6):60-65. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2012.06.013 LI Weicheng, ZHANG Yanmei, WANG Fang, et al. Application of constant-rate mercury penetration technique to study of pore throat characteristics of tight reservoir:A case study from the upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(6):60-65. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2012.06.013
[16] 时建超,屈雪峰,雷启鸿,等. 致密油储层可动流体分布特征及主控因素分析以鄂尔多斯盆地长7储层为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(5):827-834. doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.05.0827 SHI Jianchao, QU Xuefeng, LEI Qihong, et al. Distribution characteristics and controlling factors of movable fluid in tight oil reservoir:A case study of Chang 7 reservoir in Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(5):827-834. doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.05.0827
[17] 于俊波,郭殿军,王新强. 基于恒速压汞技术的低渗透储层物性特征[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 2006, 30(2):22-25. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2006.02.007 YU Junbo, GUO Dianjun, WANG Xinqiang. Study of microscopic behaviors of low permeable reservior through constant velocity mercury injection technique[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2006, 30(2):22-25. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2006.02.007
[18] 邹才能,杨智,陶士振,等. 纳米油气与源储共生型油气聚集[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(1):13-26. ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, TAO Shizhen, et al. Nanohydrocarbon and the accumulation in coexisting source and reservoir[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(1):13-26.
[19] 熊伟,雷群,刘先贵,等. 低渗透油藏拟启动压力梯度[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(2):232-236. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2009.02.015 XIONG Wei, LEI Qun, LIU Xiangui, et al. Pseudo threshold pressure gradient to flow for low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(2):232-236. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2009.02.-015
[20] 陈转转,高永利,高辉. 陇东地区长7致密油储层微观孔喉结构特征[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(2):29-33. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2014.02.006 CHEN Zhuanzhuan, GAO Yongli, Gao Hui. Study on microscope pore throat structural features of Chang-7 tight oil reservoir in the eastern region of Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 29(2):29-33. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.-2014.02.006
[21] 全洪慧,朱玉双,张洪军,等. 储层孔隙结构与水驱油微观渗流特征以安塞油田王窑区长6油层组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011, 32(6):952-960. doi:10.11743/ogg20110620 QUAN Honghui, ZHU Yushuang, ZHANG Hongjun, et al. Reservoir pore structure and micro-flow characteristics of water flooding:A case study from Chang-6 reservoir of Wangyao block in Ansai Oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2011, 32(6):952-960. doi:10.11743/ogg20110620
[22] 赵良孝,陈明江. 论储层评价中的五性关系[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(1):53-60. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.01.006 ZHAO Liangxiao, CHEN Mingjiang. A discussion on the relationships between five properties in reservoir evaluation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(1):53-60. doi:10.-3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.01.006
[23] 邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等. 非常规油气地质[M]. 2版. 北京:地质出版社, 2013.

华庆地区长6致密油储层微观孔喉结构特征

Microscopic Characteristics of Pore-throat Structures of the Chang 6 Member Tight Oil Layer in the Huaqing Region

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨超, 贺永红, 雷裕红, 庞飞, 李晓路. 鄂南三叠系延长组自生成岩矿物成因及期次[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 45-54.
[2]	白慧, 冯敏, 侯科锋, 杨特波, 郭思文. 苏里格气田东区马五5储层白云岩成因机理分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 65-73.
[3]	周晓峰, 李景, 张建欣, 李书恒, 于均民. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长₈砂岩致密时间再认识[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(3): 1-10.
[4]	刘桂珍, 张丹丹, 李盼. 鄂尔多斯东南部上古生界混积层沉积特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(2): 25-34.
[5]	吴穹螈, 吴胜和, 秦国省, 陈诚, 张佳佳. 密井网条件下钙质胶结条带空间展布研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 71-80.
[6]	陈世加, 高兴军, 喻建, 马捷, 黄海. 鄂尔多斯盆地中西部长2油层低阻成因分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(2): 1-8.
[7]	杨西燕, 包洪平, 任军峰, 马占荣. 鄂尔多斯盆地马五₅白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(2): 27-34.
[8]	张忠义, 陈世加, 姚泾利, 刘鑫, 赵应权. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密储层微观特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(6): 70-80.
[9]	程党性1，2 *，邓秀芹1，2，孙勃1，2，李继宏1，2，郭正权1，2. 西峰油区酸解烃指标异常与长8 油藏关系[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4): 48-55.
[10]	郭少斌1，赵可英2 *. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘上古生界页岩特征及含气量[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(1): 1-9.
[11]	杨勇1，2 *，黄有根2，冯炎松2，刘斌3，雷卞军4. 致密砂岩填隙物特征及其对储层的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(5): 1-8.
[12]	郭小军1 *，陈世悦2，王联国1，李德胜3，刘浪3. 鄂尔多斯西南山2 盒8 沉积体系与天然气勘探[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(5): 9-15.
[13]	孙琳1 *，王兵1，蒲万芬1，斯荣2，辛军3. 热水对超低渗储集层微观孔喉结构的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(1): 153-158.
[14]	王凯，张旭，唐圣松，姜亭. 铜川地区油页岩地层电性断面特征及勘查[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(3): 59-67.
[15]	赵继勇，何永宏，樊建明，李书恒，王石头. 超低渗透致密油藏水平井井网优化技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(2): 91-98.