存在有限导流断层的条带状油藏试井新模型

doi:10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.10.18.01

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 155-162.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.10.18.01

存在有限导流断层的条带状油藏试井新模型

曾杨^1,2, 张烈辉³, 康晓东^1,2, 谢晓庆^1,2

1. 海洋石油高效开发国家重点实验室, 北京朝阳 100027;
2. 中海油研究总院, 北京朝阳 100027;
3. “油气藏地质及开发工程”国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2016-10-18 出版日期:2017-10-01 发布日期:2017-10-01
作者简介:曾杨,1987年生,女,汉族,四川广安人,工程师,硕士,主要从事油气田开发及提高采收率相关研究工作。E-mail:261058662@qq.com;张烈辉,1967年生,男,汉族,四川仁寿人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气渗流理论、油气藏工程及数值模拟等领域的教学和科研工作。E-mail:zhangliehui@vip.163.com;康晓东,1978年生,男,汉族,河南许昌人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事油气田开发及提高采收率相关研究工作。E-mail:kangxd@cnooc.com.cn;谢晓庆,1982年生,男,汉族,河南南阳人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事油气田开发及提高采收率的相关研究工作。E-mail:xiexq@cnooc.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2011ZX05024004）；中海油有限公司项目（YXKY2014ZY03）

Well-testing Interpretation Model for Strip Reservoirs with Finite Diversion Faults

ZENG Yang^1,2, ZHANG Liehui³, KANG Xiaodong^1,2, XIE Xiaoqing^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploitation, Chaoyang, Beijing 100027, China;
2. CNOOC Research Institute, Chaoyang, Beijing 100027, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2016-10-18 Online:2017-10-01 Published:2017-10-01
Contact: 曾杨,E-mail:261058662@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目前对断层封闭性的试井研究主要集中于封闭断层，用现有的试井解释模型对具有非封闭断层尤其是有限导流断层边界的油气藏试井资料进行解释所得到的结果往往并不理想。通过引入界面表皮的概念，建立了条带状油藏中存在有限导流断层的试井解释新模型，模型不仅考虑了流体通过断层面，还考虑了断层内部流体的流动，并利用Fourier余弦变换和Laplace变换等数学物理方法求得了井底压力表达式。绘制了模型的井底压力响应特征曲线，曲线共有7个流动阶段。分析表明，无因次导流能力F_CD值越大，曲线下凹程度越大；界面表皮S值越大，曲线上翘程度越大，当S值足够大时，表现为封闭断层的特征；无因次导压系数η_fD主要影响压力导数曲线下降的多少；流度比、厚度比、导压系数比主要影响压力导数曲线上升和下降。

关键词: 有限导流断层, 界面表皮, 压力动态, 条带状油藏, 试井模型

Abstract:

At present, well fault seal analysis tests are mainly focused on closed faults. When using the existing well test interpretation model to explain oil and gas well-test data with non-closed faults, especially with a finite diversion fault boundary, the results are not ideal. By introducing the concept of interfacial skin, a new model of well-test interpretation with a finite diversion fault in stripe reservoirs was established. The model considers not only the fluid passing through the fault plane, but also the flow of fluid in the fault. The Fourier cosine transform, Laplace transform, and other mathematical physics methods were used to obtain the bottom hole pressure equation. The bottom hole stress response curves of the model were plotted, and there were seven flow stages. The results show that the larger the F_CD value, the more concave the curve. The larger the S value, the more convex the curve; when the S value is sufficiently large, characteristics of a closed fault are demonstrated. η_fD mainly affects the amount of decrease in the pressure derivative curve. The fluidity ratio, thickness ratio, and pressure derivative coefficient ratio mainly affect the increase and decrease in the pressure derivative curve.

Key words: finite diversion fault, interfacial skin, pressure dynamic, stripe reservoir, well test model

中图分类号:

TE353

曾杨, 张烈辉, 康晓东, 谢晓庆. 存在有限导流断层的条带状油藏试井新模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(5): 155-162.

ZENG Yang, ZHANG Liehui, KANG Xiaodong, XIE Xiaoqing. Well-testing Interpretation Model for Strip Reservoirs with Finite Diversion Faults[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(5): 155-162.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.10.18.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2017/V39/I5/155

参考文献

[1] 周路,王丽君,罗晓容,等. 断层连通概率计算及其应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(3):1118. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2010.03.003 ZHOU Lu, WANG Lijun, LUO Xiaorong, et al. The calculation and application of fault connective probability[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 32(3):11-18. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2010.03.003
[2] 李传亮. 非封闭断层的试井解释方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1997, 18(4):370376. LI Chuangliang. Interpretation of non-closed fault by applying well testing method[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1997, 18(4):370-376.
[3] 叶双江,姜汉桥,孙传宗,等. 断块油藏水平井产能研究及断层封堵影响分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011, 33(5):131136. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2011.05.024 YE Shuangjiang, JIANG Hanqiao, SUN Chuanzong, et al. Productivity evaluation for horizontal well and analysis of fault sealing impacts in faulted block reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33(5):131-136. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2011.05.024
[4] 刘曰武,张奇斌,孙波. 试井分析理论和应用的发展[J]. 测井技术, 2004, 28(1):6974. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2004.z1.016 LIU Yuewu, ZHANG Qibin, SUN Bo. Developments of well test theory and its applications[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2004, 28(1):69-74. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2004.z1.016
[5] 刘宏,甘典国. 复杂小断块油藏疑难井试井重新解释[J]. 油气井测试, 2007, 16(6):2125. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4388.2007.06.008 LIU Hong, GAN Dianguo. A new interpretation of difficult well testing in the small fault-block complex reservoir[J]. Well Testing, 2007, 16(6):21-25. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4388.2007.06.008
[6] 张晓东. 试井曲线计算机自动拟合算法及应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(4):134138. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.04.034 ZHANG Xiaodong. the application and algorithm of automatic type-curve matching in well testing[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2008, 30(4):134-138. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.04.034
[7] 孙贺东. 邻井干扰条件下的多井压力恢复试井分析方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(5):6268. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.05.009 SUN Hedong. Pressure buildup analysis in multiwell systems under interferences from adjacent wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(5):62-68. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.05.009
[8] 刘旭礼. 页岩气体积压裂压后试井分析与评价[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(8):6672. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.08.009 LIU Xuli. Well test analysis and evaluation after shalegas volume fracturing stimulation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(8):66-72. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.08.009
[9] HORNER D R. Pressure build-up in wells[C]. Proceeding Third World Petroleum Congress, 1951.
[10] PRASAD R K. Pressure transient analysis in the presence of two intersecting boundaries[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1975, 27(1):89-96. doi:10.2118/4560-PA
[11] TIAB D, KUMAR A. Detection and location of two parallel sealing faults around a well[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1980, 32(10):1701-1708. doi:10.2118/6056-PA
[12] EARLOUGHER R C, RAMEY H J, MILLER F G, et al. Pressure distributions in a rectangular reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1968, 20(2):199-208. doi:10.2118/1956-PA
[13] BIXEL H C, LARKIN B K, VAN POOLLEN H K, et al. Effect of linear discontinuity on pressure buildup and drawdown behavior[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1963, 15(8):885-895. doi:10.2118/611-PA
[14] KUCHUK F J, HABASHY T M. Pressure behavior of laterally composite reservoir[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1997, 12(1):47-56. doi:10.2118/24678-PA
[15] STEWART G, GUPTA A, WESTAWAY P. The interpretation of interference tests in a reservoir with a sealing and a partially communicating faults[C]. SPE 12967, 1984. doi:10.2118/12967-MS
[16] STRELTSOVA T D, MCKINLEY R M. Effect of flow time duration on buildup pattern for reservoirs with heterogeneous properties[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1984, 24(3):294-306. doi:10.2118/11140-PA
[17] YAXELY L M. Effect of partially communicating fault on transient pressure behavior[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1987, 2(4):590-598. doi:10.2118/14311-PA
[18] AMBASTHA A K, MCLEROY P G, GRADER A S. Effect of a partially communicating fault in a composite reservoir on transient pressure testing[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1989, 4(2):210-218. doi:10.2118/16764-PA
[19] ABBASZADEH M D. Pressure transient behavior in a reservoir with a finite-conductivity fault[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1995, 10(1):26-32. doi:10.2118/24704-PA
[20] VAN EVERDINGEN A F. The skin effect and its influence on the productivity capacity of a well[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1953, 5(6):171-176. doi:10.2118/203-G
[21] HURST W. Establishment of the skin effect and its impediment to fluid flow in a wellbore[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 1953, 25(8):6-16. doi:10.2118/315-PA

存在有限导流断层的条带状油藏试井新模型

Well-testing Interpretation Model for Strip Reservoirs with Finite Diversion Faults

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	方全堂, 李政澜, 段永刚, 魏明强, 张羽翼. 考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 139-145.
[2]	刘启国, 金吉焱, 贵富, 李科, 成显安. 存在直线断层的复合模型试井曲线特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 113-118.
[3]	何应付;李美芳. 多裂缝系统垂直裂缝井不稳定渗流分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(3): 85-88.
[4]	刘启国;王辉;王瑞成;李孝常. 多层气藏井分层产量贡献计算方法及影响因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32 (1): 80-84.
[5]	张烈辉王海涛贾永禄刘洋. 层间窜流的双孔介质双层油藏渗流模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(5): 178-182.
[6]	刘柏峰a 柳阳明陈伟b 段永刚c. 基于边界元法的串珠状油藏压力动态分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(4): 127-130.
[7]	何国良向开理. 变形双重介质分形油藏渗流数学模型及压力动态特征 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 24(4): 24-28.
[8]	向开理李允李铁军. 分形油藏低速非达西渗流问题的组合数学模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 23(4): 9-12.
[9]	刘启国李晓平吴晓庆. 用边界元法分析复杂形状油藏不稳定压力动态 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 23(2): 40-43.
[10]	何炳全向开理. 分形油藏不稳定渗流有效井径数学模型的解析解 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 22(3): 37-40.
[11]	李凡华刘慈群. 有界分形油藏的压力动态分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 19(2): 47-50.
[12]	范学平黄建民唐愉拉许卫. 用边界元方法分析射孔完井非稳定渗流问题[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 18(3): 57-67.
[13]	李晓平赵必荣吴小庆刘启国. 水平井压力动态分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1994, 16(2): 34-40.
[14]	吴小庆李晓平赵必荣. 应用正交变换法求解裂缝性气藏水平井压力动态模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1993, 15(3): 53-59.