基于沉积时间单元的单砂体研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.09.17.02

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1-13.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.09.17.02

• 地质勘探 • 下一篇

基于沉积时间单元的单砂体研究

盛军¹, 牟中海², 蒲勇³, 吴涛¹, 王军林⁴

1. 中国石油青海油田分公司研究院, 甘肃敦煌 736202;
2. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院, 四川成都 610500;
3. 中国石油青海油田分公司青海油田生产运行处, 甘肃敦煌 736202;
4. 中国石油青海油田分公司青海油田采油五厂, 甘肃敦煌 736202

收稿日期:2020-09-17 发布日期:2022-10-28
通讯作者: 牟中海,E-mail:swpumzh@163.com
作者简介:盛军，1986年生，男，汉族，甘肃武威人，高级工程师，博士，主要从事开发地质精描方面的研究工作。E-mail：shengjunqh@petrochina.com.cn;
牟中海，1960年生，男，汉族，陕西扶风人，教授，博士，主要从事石油地质、油气藏描述与三维地质建模方面的研究工作。E-mail：swpumzh@163.com;
蒲勇，1977年生，男，汉族，重庆云阳人，工程师，主要从事油气生产管理工作。E-mail：puyqh@petrochina.com.cn;
吴涛，1991年生，男，汉族，甘肃敦煌人，工程师，主要从事油气开发地质方面的研究工作。E-mail：zhangsan@126.com;
王军林，1984年生，男，汉族，宁夏中卫人，工程师，主要从事油气田开发方面的研究工作。E-mail：wjlydqh@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项（2016E-0104GF）

A Study on Single Sand Body Based on Sedimentary Time Unit

SHENG Jun¹, MOU Zhonghai², PU Yong³, WU Tao¹, WANG Junlin⁴

1. Research Institute of Qinghai Oilfield Company, CNPC, Dunhuang, Gansu 736202, China;
2. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
3. Production and Operation Department of Qinghai Oilfield Company, CNPC, Dunhuang, Gansu 736202, China;
4. No.5 Oil Producing Plant of Qinghai Oilfield Company, CNPC, Dunhuang, Gansu 736202, China

Received:2020-09-17 Published:2022-10-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以尕斯库勒油田N₁—N₂¹油藏Ⅱ号断层上盘Ⅶ砂组辫状河三角洲前缘亚相为例，探讨了基于小层规模的沉积时间单元划分、单砂体的含义与识别标志及构型模式。研究表明，根据自然伽马半幅点可以将小层细分为储层沉积时间单元、隔层沉积时间单元，并在储层沉积时间单元中识别出区域夹层。区域夹层与隔层沉积时间单元为泥岩沉积，储层沉积时间单元在横向上为砂泥岩间互沉积。在此基础上，提出了单砂体的完整概念，认为单砂体就是在三维空间被周围非渗透性的封隔层所包围的独立砂体。并指出了单砂体受沉积、构造及成岩三大因素控制，明确了在这三大因素控制下单砂体的识别标志，同时总结出了单砂体的基本构型模式。笔者成功地将这套研究方法应用于尕斯库勒油田Ⅶ—5小层，把原来小层级别的两个单砂体划分为沉积时间单元级别的17个单砂体，大大提高了单砂体的研究精度。

关键词: 尕斯库勒油田, 辫状河三角洲前缘, 沉积时间单元, 单砂体, 构型模式

Abstract: The braided river delta front subfacies of Ⅶ sand group in the hanging wall of fault N₁—N₂¹ reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield was chosen as the object of study. The division of sedimentary time unit, the meaning and identification mark of single sand body, and configuration mode are discussed. Based on the natural gamma half amplitude point, the subzone can be divided into reservoir sedimentary time unit, interlayer sedimentary time unit, and the regional interlayer within the reservoir sedimentary time unit. The sedimentary time units of the regional interlayer and interlayer are mainly composed of mudstone, and the sedimentary time unit of the reservoir majorly consists of laterally-connected sandstone and mudstone. The complete concept of a single sand body is first proposed based on the forgoing ideas. The single sand body, which is formed under the control of sedimentation, structure, and diagenesis, is supposed to be an independent unit surrounded by an impermeable barrier layer in three-dimensional space. The identification marks of a single sand body are clarified, and the basic configuration mode of a single sand body is also summarized in this study. The author has successfully applied this method to subzone Ⅶ—5 in the Gasikule Oilfield. The two single sand bodies of the subzone level are further divided into 17 single sand bodies of sedimentary time unit level, which greatly improves the research accuracy of a single sand body.

Key words: Gasikule Oilfield, braided river delta front, sedimentary time unit, single sand body, configuration mode

中图分类号:

TE122

盛军, 牟中海, 蒲勇, 吴涛, 王军林. 基于沉积时间单元的单砂体研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(5): 1-13.

SHENG Jun, MOU Zhonghai, PU Yong, WU Tao, WANG Junlin. A Study on Single Sand Body Based on Sedimentary Time Unit[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 44(5): 1-13.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.09.17.02

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2022/V44/I5/1

参考文献

[1] WANG Yibo, MA Shizhong, SHI Jinhua, et al. Correlation means of sedimentary time unit to single sand-body in complex fluvial facies stratum[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2012, 31(1): 47-50, 62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2012.01.008 王一博, 马世忠, 石金华, 等. 复杂河流相地层单砂体级沉积时间单元对比方法[J]. 地质科技情报, 2012, 31(1): 47-50, 62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2012.01.008
[2] ZHANG Qingguo, BAO Zhidong, SONG Xinmin, et al. Hierarchical division and origin of single sand bodies in Fuyu Oil Layer, Fuyu Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(2): 157-163. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2008.02.004 张庆国, 鲍志东, 宋新民, 等. 扶余油田扶余油层储集层单砂体划分及成因分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(2): 157-163. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2008.02.004
[3] FENG Congjun, BAO Zhidong, SHAN Qitong, et al. Single sand body identification in compound distributary channel of delta plain: A case study from the fourth member of Quantou Formation in the southern part of central Fuyu Oilfield[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2012, 33(1): 77-83. doi: 10.11743/ogg20120110 封从军, 鲍志东, 单启铜, 等. 三角洲平原复合分流河道内部单砂体划分-以扶余油田中区南部泉头组四段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(1): 77-83. doi: 10.11743/ogg20120110
[4] WU Jian, LI Fanhua. Prediction of oil-bearing single sandbody by 3D geological modeling combined with seismic inversion[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(5): 623-627. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2009.05.011 吴键, 李凡华. 三维地质建模与地震反演结合预测含油单砂体[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(5): 623-627. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2009.05.011
[5] Xiaoguang, ZHANG Xuewen, LIU Henian, et al. Development of single-channel sandbody framework model by integrating seismic inversion and well data[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(6): 82-86. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2007.06.016 吕晓光, 张学文, 刘合年, 等. 综合运用地震反演及测井资料建立单砂体骨架模型[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(6): 82-86. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2007.06.01
[6] FENG Congjun, BAO Zhidong, DAI Chunming, et al. Superimposition patterns of underwater distributary channel sands in deltaic front and its control on remaining oil distribution: A case study from K₁q⁴ in J19 Block, Fuyu Oilfield[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1): 128-135. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150116 封从军, 鲍志东, 代春明, 等. 三角洲前缘水下分流河道单砂体叠置机理及对剩余油的控制-以扶余油田J19区块泉头组四段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1): 128-135. doi: 10.11743/ogg20150116
[7] XU Hui, LIN Chengyan, LEI Guanglun, et al. Remaining oil distribution law and potential tapping measures of subaqueous distributary channel single sandbody[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Science and Technology), 2013, 37(2): 14-20, 35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2013.02.003 徐慧, 林承焰, 雷光伦, 等. 水下分流河道单砂体剩余油分布规律与挖潜对策[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(2): 14-20, 35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2013.02.003
[8] WU Shenghe, JI Youliang, YUE Dali, et al. Discussion on hierarchical scheme of architectural units in clastic deposits[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2013, 19(1): 12-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2013.01.004 吴胜和, 纪友亮, 岳大力, 等. 碎屑沉积地质体构型分级方案探讨[J]. 高校地质学报, 2013, 19(1): 12-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2013.01.004
[9] WU Qiongyuan, CHEN Xiaoming, ZHAO Hanqing, et al. Study on the hierarchy of a distributary-mouth bar type shallow-water delta reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science and Technology Edition), 2019, 41(2): 53-63. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2018.11.16.10 吴穹螈, 陈晓明, 赵汉卿, 等. 分流砂坝型浅水三角洲储层构型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(2): 53-63. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2018.11.16.10
[10] YU Xinghe. Existing problems and sedimentogenesis based methods of reservoir characterization during the middle and later periods of oilfield development[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2): 1-14. 于兴河. 油田开发中后期储层面临的问题与基于沉积成因的地质表征方法[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(2): 1-14.
[11] NIU Bo, ZHAO Jiahong, FU Ping, et al. Trend judgment of abandoned channels and fine architecture characterization in meandering river reservoirs: A case study of Neogene Minhuazhen Formation NmⅢ2 layer in Shijiutuo bulge, Chengning Uplift, Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(5): 891-901. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.05.08 牛博, 赵家宏, 付平, 等. 曲流河废弃河道走向判定与单砂体构型表征-以渤海湾盆地埕宁隆起石臼坨凸起西部新近系明化镇组下段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(5): 891-901. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.05.08
[12] ZHAO Lun, WANG Jincai, CHEN Li, et al. Influences of delta sandstone architecture on waterflooding sweep characteristics: A case study of Layer J-Ⅱ of Kumkol South Oilfield in South Turgay Basin, Kazakstan[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(3): 407-414. doi: 10.11698/PED.2017.03.10 赵伦, 王进财, 陈礼, 等. 三角洲砂体构型对水驱波及特征的影响-以南图尔盖盆地Kumkol South油田J-Ⅱ层为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(3): 407-414. doi: 10.11698/PED.2017.03.10
[13] FENG Congjun, BAO Zhidong, ZHANG Jihui, et al. Dividing of base-level cycle and its controlling on single sand body in the fourth member of Quantou Formation in Fuyu Oilfield[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(S2): 62-69. 封从军, 鲍志东, 张吉辉, 等. 扶余油田中区泉四段基准面旋回划分及对单砂体的控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(S2): 62-69.
[14] LIANG Weiwei, DANG Hailong, XU Bo, et al. Establishment of reservoir architecture model of lacustrine delta based on single sandbody: Taking S Area in Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 35(2): 26-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2020.02.004 梁卫卫, 党海龙, 徐波, 等. 基于单砂体的湖泊三角洲相储层构型模型的建立-以鄂尔多斯盆地S区块为例[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 35(2): 26-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2020.02.004
[15] CAO Guoqiang. Sedimentary facies of the Tertiary in west Qaidam Basin[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005. 曹国强. 柴达木盆地西部地区第三系沉积相研究[D]. 广州: 中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所), 2005.
[16] WANG Xia, LIU Yongwei, ZHANG Tianjin, et al. Fine strata classification and correlation of Chang 6 oil-bearing formation in Hanjiagou Aera of Jingbian Oilfield[J]. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2017, 43(8): 96-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7981.2017.08.035 王霞, 刘永卫, 张添锦, 等. 靖边油田韩家沟区长6油层组精细地层划分与对比[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2017, 43(8): 96-98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7981.2017.08.035
[17] HAN Xinggang, XIAO Feng, ZHANG Wei, et al. Stratigraphic division and correlation of braid river reservoiran example from Su X Dense Wellarea, Sulige Gas Field[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2018, 48(1): 76-84. doi: 10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20160244 韩兴刚, 肖峰, 张伟, 等. 辫状河沉积储层小层精细划分对比-以苏里格气田苏X加密井区为例[J]. 中国海洋大学学报, 2018, 48(1): 76-84. doi: 10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20160244
[18] YANG Hongwei. The is so bath sublayer correlation method on the beach-bar sand bottom of Block DA 101 in Dawangzhuang Oilfield and its effect analysis[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 13(11): 30-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1409(s).2016.-11.007 杨宏伟. 大王庄油田大101块滩坝砂体底面等高程法小层对比及效果分析[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2016, 13(11): 30-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1409(s).2016.-11.007
[19] XUE Chunqi, HU Mingyi, SUN Chunyan, et al. High resolution sequence stratigraphy of Fuyu Formation in the central depression of Songliao Basin[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(30): 20-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.30.004 薛纯琦, 胡明毅, 孙春燕, 等. 松辽盆地中央坳陷区头台油田扶余油层高分辨率层序地层学研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(30): 20-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.30.004
[20] MOU Zhonghai, LIU Xue, CHANG Lin, et al. Modeling of the reservoir architecture of thin interbedded deposits[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science and Technology Edition), 2020, 42(3): 1-12. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2018.11.21.06 牟中海, 刘雪, 常琳, 等. 薄互层型沉积体储层构型建模[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(3): 1-12. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2018.11.21.06
[21] ZHAO Hanqing, FU Zhiguo, LÜ Xiaoguang, et al. Methods for detailed description of large fluvial-delta depositional reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2000, 21(4): 109-113. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2000.04.021 赵翰卿, 付志国, 吕晓光, 等. 大型河流-三角洲沉积储层精细描述方法[J]. 石油学报, 2000, 21(4): 109-113. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2000.04.021
[22] YIN Taiju, ZHANG Changmin, TANG Jun, et al. Analysis on reservoir hierarchical structure in Machang Oilfield[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2001, 23(4): 19-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2001.04.006 尹太举, 张昌民, 汤军, 等. 马厂油田储层层次结构分析[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 2001, 23(4): 19-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2001.04.006
[23] LI Xingguo. Correlation of single sand members in fluvial deltaic phase reservoir rocks in Shengtuo Gudao Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1984, 31(5): 30-38. 李兴国. 胜坨孤岛油田河流三角洲相储集层单砂层划分对比方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1984, 31(5): 30-38.
[24] Xiaoguang, YU Hongwen, TIAN Donghui, et al. Geological research of subdividing single sand beds in the late high water content period of oilfields[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1993, 14(4): 345-349. 吕晓光, 于洪文, 田东辉, 等. 高含水后期油田细分单砂层的地质研究[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1993, 14(4): 345-349.
[25] WU Bibo, ZOU Mingsheng, LU Jiang, et al. A quantitative evaluation of fault sealing of the TY Oilfield in the Weixinan Sag[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science and Technology Edition), 2019, 41(4): 74-80. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2018.09.29.01 吴碧波, 邹明生, 陆江, 等. 涠西南凹陷TY油田断层封闭性定量评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 74-80. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2018.09.29.01
[26] CUI Dian. Cemented sealing in Kexia fault zone in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(6): 48-54. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.06.007 崔殿. 准噶尔盆地西北缘克夏断裂带胶结封闭作用研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2015, 27(6): 48-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.06.007

基于沉积时间单元的单砂体研究

A Study on Single Sand Body Based on Sedimentary Time Unit

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵汉卿, 郭诚, 陈晓明, 刘超, 张博. 垦利A油田辫状河三角洲前缘优质储层特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 21-32.
[2]	罗云1 *，罗文利2，王强2，刘锐1. 高温高盐可动凝胶配方研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(2): 149-154.