Application of Dissolvable Screen Pipe in HTHP Gas Well in Tarim Oilfield

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.10.21.32

Abstract

Abstract: In order to solve the problem of clean completion of high temperature and high pressure gas wells and rapid workover of sand buried wells in Tarim Oilfield, a dissolvable screen pipe has been developed that can be acid dissolvable to form a production channel, which can achieve the goal of clean completion by fully replacing the fluid. The dissolvable screen pipe is connected to the lower tubing column of the packer by pins, which can be fished in sections during workover operations, reducing the workload, lowering the workover cycle, reducing the risk and improving the workover efficiency, thus reducing the damage to the reservoir during workover operations. The material dissolved in all thicknesses at a temperature of 110 ℃. The physical properties also met the seal design requirements of 35 MPa internal pressure test and 15 min continuous steady pressure, and no deformation in the 650 kN tensile load test. In the three wells applied in the field, the average recovery rate of 211.0% was much higher than the previous 78.1%, achieving the effect of low-cost clean completion and safe repair operation later, which provides a good reference for the application effect of this technology.

Key words: HTHP, dissolvable screen pipe, clean well completion, pin connection, sectional fishing

CLC Number:

TE257

WEI Junhui, JING Hongtao, XIE Ying, LI Jianming, SI Xiang. Application of Dissolvable Screen Pipe in HTHP Gas Well in Tarim Oilfield[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2023, 45(6): 125-134.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.10.21.32

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/EN/Y2023/V45/I6/125

References

[1] 房超，张辉，陈朝伟，等. 地质工程一体化漏失机理与预防措施——以塔里木库车山前古近系复合盐层为例[J]. 石油钻采工艺， 2022， 44(6):684-692. doi:10.13639/j.odpt.2022.06.004 FANG Chao, ZHANG Hui, CHEN Chaowei, et al. Geology-engineering integrated investigation of leakoff mechanisms and prevention measures: A case study of the Palaeogene composite salt layer in the Kuqa piedmont zone, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology Technology, 2022, 44(6): 684-692. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2022.06.004
[2] 田军，王清华，杨海军，等. 塔里木盆地油气勘探历程与启示[J]. 新疆石油地质， 2021， 42(3):272-282. doi:10.7657/XJPG20210303 TIAN Jun, WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, et al. Petroleum exploration history and enlightenment in Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(3): 272-282. doi:10.7657/XJPG20210303
[3] 杨川，刘忠飞，肖勇，等. 库车山前构造高温高压储层环空密封固井技术[J]. 断块油气田， 2019， 26(2):264-268. doi:10.6056/dkyqt201902028 YANG Chuan, LIU Zhongfei, XIAO Yong, et al. Cementing technology of annulus sealing in high-temperature and high-pressure reservoir of Kuqa piedmont[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26(2): 264-268. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt201902028
[4] 宋金鹏，郇志鹏，田盼盼，等. 超深致密砂岩储层特征及影响因素:以库车坳陷阳霞凹陷侏罗系为例[J]. 断块油气田， 2021， 28(5):592-597. doi:10.6056/dkyqt202105003 SONG Jinpeng, HUAN Zhipeng, TIAN Panpan, et al. Features and influence factors of ultra-deep tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of Jurassic in Yangxia Sag, Kuqa Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(5): 592-597. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202105003
[5] 彭永洪，陈飞，李彦召，等. 库车山前大斜度井储层改造试验与认识[J]. 钻采工艺， 2021， 44(3):33-36， 41. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2021.03.08 PENG Yonghong, CHEN Fei, LI Yanzhao, et al. Experiment and cognition of reservoir stimulation in highlydeviated well in Kuqa foreland basin[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2021, 44(3): 33-36, 41. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2021.03.08
[6] 刘强，王志凯，王选茹，等. 超低渗透油藏大斜度井适应性评价[J]. 断块油气田， 2022， 29(3):302-306. doi:10.6056/dkyqt202203003 LIU Qiang, WANG Zhikai, WANG Xuanru, et al. Adaptability evaluation of highly deviated well in ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2022, 29(3): 302-306. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202203003
[7] 何子辰，张仕民，李晓军，等. 选择性完井管柱设计及应用[J]. 石油机械， 2018， 46(5):23-29. doi:10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2018.05.004 HE Zichen, ZHANG Shimin, LI Xiaojun, et al. Selective completion string design and application[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2018, 46(5): 23-29. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2018.05.004
[8] 孙海芳，刘飞，王志敏. 高温高压气井试油完井一体化工艺技术[J]. 钻采工艺， 2017， 40(4):36-39. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2017.04.12 SUN Haifang, LIU Fei, WANG Zhimin. Integrated technology of oil testing and completion in high temperature and high pressure gas wells[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2017, 40(4): 36-39. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2017.04.12
[9] 熊茂县，谢俊峰，章景城，等. 高温高压气井清洁完井工艺管柱研究与应用[C]. 重庆:第32届全国天然气学术年会， 2020. doi:10.26914/c.cnkihy.2020.065108 XIONG Maoxian, XIE Junfeng, ZHANG Jingcheng, et al. Research and application of clean completion process tubing column for high temperature and high pressure gas wells[C]. Chongqing: The 32^nd Annual National Natural Gas Symposium, 2020. doi: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2020.065108
[10] 陈一男. 布孔参数对筛管强度影响的研究及优化设计[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东)， 2012. doi:10.7666/d.y2070649 CHEN Yi'nan. Study on the influence of hole arrangement parameters on the strength of sieve tube and its optimization design[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2012. doi: 10.7666/d.y2070649
[11] 杨小城，李俊，邹刚. 可溶桥塞试验研究及现场应用[J]. 石油机械， 2018， 46(7):94-97. doi:10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2018.07.018 YANG Xiaocheng, LI Jun, ZOU Gang. Dissolvable bridge plug test and field application[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2018, 46(7): 94-97. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2018.07.018
[12] 魏辽，刘建立，朱敏涛，等. 多级滑套可溶解憋压球材料研究[J]. 石油机械， 2015， 43(11):102-106. doi:10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2015.11.021 WEI Liao, LIU Jianli, ZHU Mintao, et al. Study on the material of dissolvable ball for multistage fracturing sleeve[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2015, 43(11): 102-106. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2015.11.021
[13] 刘丙晓，周姿潼，车航，等. 一种水解酯潜在缓速土酸的实验评价[J]. 石油钻采工艺， 2015， 37(6):98-101， 129. doi:10.13639/j.odpt.2015.06.025 LIU Bingxiao, ZHOU Zitong, CHE Hang, et al. Laboratory evaluation on a kind of potential retarded mud acid charactered with hydrolyzed ester[[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2015, 37(6): 98-101, 129. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2015.06.025
[14] 齐彪，李银婷，乐明，等. 塔河油田一井多靶可酸溶堵漏技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液， 2022， 39(6):730-737. doi:10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.06.010 QI Biao, LI Yinting, YUE Ming, et al. Study on an acid soluble LCM used for multi-target well in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2022, 39(6): 730-737. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.06.010
[15] 杨雪，袁旭，何小东，等. 酸液溶蚀作用对支撑剂性能的影响[J]. 断块油气田， 2021， 28(1):68-71. doi:10.6056/dkyqt202101012 YANG Xue, YUAN Xu, HE Xiaodong, et al. The effect of acid corrosion on proppant properties[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2021, 28(1): 68-71. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202101012
[16] 凌云，李鸿斌，黄晓江，等. 连续油管液压丢手工具断裂分析及预防[J]. 焊管， 2021， 44(10):33-37. doi:10.19291/j.cnki.1001-3938.2021.10.007 LING Yun, LI Hongbin, HUANG Xiaojiang, et al. Fracture analysis and prevention of hydraulic releasing tool of coiled tubing[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube, 2021, 44(10): 33-37. doi: 10.19291/j.cnki.1001-3938.2021.10.007
[17] 万锋，管锋，王琼. 基于响应面法的丢手释放接头优化设计[J]. 机械强度， 2021， 43(1):114-121. doi:10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2021.01.017 WANG Feng, GUAN Feng, WANG Qiong. Optimal design of release joint based on response surface method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2021, 43(1): 114-121. doi: 10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2021.01.017
[18] 吴双亮，王磊，路明，等. 注水管柱逐级解封解卡安全丢手工具的研制与应用[J]. 钻采工艺， 2023， 46(4):106-109. WU Shuangliang, WANG Lei, LU Ming, et al. Development and application of safe release tool for step-by-step releasing water injection string[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(4): 106-109.
[19] 侯海洋. 抽油机井丢手防喷工具防喷安全性分析及评价[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学， 2022. doi:10.26995/d.cnki.gdqsc.2022.000476 HOU Haiyang. Analysis and evaluation of blowout prevention safety of lost blowout preventer in pumping well[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2022. doi: 10.26995/d.cnki.gdqsc.2022.000476
[20] COTE M L, ROSSON J C. Multiport assemblies including access apertures and a release tool: US201816204382[P]. 2020-09-08.
[21] LIU Ran, LI Qun. Analysis of the bimaterial interface cracks based on configurational forces[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2021, 88(10): 101009. doi: 10.1115/1.4051424
[22] 孟胡，申颍浩，朱万雨，等. 四川盆地昭通页岩气水平井水力压裂套管外载分析[J]. 特种油气藏， 2023， 30(5):166-174. MENG Hu, SHEN Yinghao, ZHU Wanyu, et al. External load analysis of hydraulic fracturing casing in Zhaotong shale gas horizontal well of Sichuan Basin[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(5): 166-174.
[23] 尹学琴. 克深区块采气管柱力学分析及管柱结构优化[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京)， 2020. doi:10.27643/d.cnki.gsybu.2020.000369 YIN Xueqin. Mechanical analysis of gas production pipe string and optimization of pipe string structure in Keshen Block[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum, 2020. doi: 10.27643/d.cnki.gsybu.2020.000369
[24] 李川，杜现飞，殷桂琴，等. 井下丢手式分层体积压裂工艺研究与现场试验[J]. 石油机械， 2015， 43(6):80-83. doi:10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2015.06.018 LI Chuan, DU Xianfei, YIN Guiqin, et al. Research on and field test of downhole release-type separate layer volumetric fracturing technology[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2015, 43(6): 80-83. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2015.06.018
[25] 魏波，彭永洪，熊茂县，等. 超深层高压气井可溶筛管清洁完井新工艺研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺， 2022， 45(3):61-66. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2022.03.11 WEI Bo, PENG Yonghong, XIONG Maoxian, et al. Study and application of new clean completion technology for soluble screen in ultra-deep high pressure gas well[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2022, 45(3): 61-66. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2022.03.11
[26] 窦益华，赵兴邦，米红学，等. 典型工况下完井管柱井下安全阀力学性能分析[J]. 石油钻采工艺， 2023， 45(2):184-189. doi:10.13639/j.odpt.2023.02.009 DOU Yihua, ZHAO Xingbang, MI Hongxue, et al. Mechanical performance analysis of downhole safety valve of completion string under typical working conditions[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 45(2): 184-189. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2023.02.009
[27] 练章华，王天，牟易升，等. 复杂力学环境中完井管柱屈曲行为及其防控措施[J]. 科学技术与工程， 2021， 21(5):1758-1763. LIAN Zhanghua, WANG Tian, MOU Yisheng, et al. Buckling behavior of completion string in complex mechanical environment and preventive measures[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(5): 1758-1763.