Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 45-58.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2025.12.02.04

• A Special Issue on Construction Technologies of Depleted Oil Reservoir Underground Gas Storages • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Rock Mechanical Characteristics of Reservoir and Caprock in Medium-deep Gas Storage with Different Lithologies

DUAN Bin1, WU Haitao1, HAN Dongliang2, ZHAO Yao1, WANG Miao1, ZHANG Ziyu3   

  1. 1. PetroChina Jidong Oilfield Company, Tangshan, Hebei 063004, China;
    2. College of New Energy and Materials Science, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China;
    3. College of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China
  • Received:2025-12-02 Online:2026-07-20 Published:2026-07-20
  • About author:段彬,1982年生,男,汉族,四川简阳人,工程师,主要从事油气藏开发地质、油气田开发与储气库方案设计等研究工作。E-mail:duanbin@petrochina.com.cn
    吴海涛,1983年生,男,汉族,山东临朐人,工程师,主要从事油气田开发和油气藏改建储气库研究。E-mail:qhwht1983@petrochina.com.cn
    韩东亮,2001年生,男,汉族,河南驻马店人,硕士研究生,主要从事地下储气库岩石力学和地质力学方面的研究。E-mail:17300931466@163.com
    赵耀,1986年生,男,汉族,湖北黄冈人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事油气田开发方面研究。E-mail:yibeilol@163.com
    王淼,1988年生,女,汉族,吉林松原人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事油气田开发地质与储气库方案设计等研究工作。E-mail:wangmiao2013@petrochina.com.cn
    张子玉,2001年生,女,汉族,山东济南人,硕士研究生,主要从事地下储气库岩石力学和地质力学方面的研究。E-mail:2647809522@qq.com

Abstract: In order to address the differences in mechanical properties of reservoir and cap rocks in middle and deep UGS, this paper selects mudstone, shale, sandstone, and dolomite cores from four UGS (P, M, X, S) and systematically compares their mechanical properties through uniaxial, triaxial, and fatigue compression experiments. The results are as follows: 1) The mechanical strength and deformation resistance of shale in UGS X are weaker than those of cap mudstone of UGS P. The compressive strength and elastic modulus of dolomite in UGS X are much higher than those of sandstone, and its compressive strength can reach more than twice that of sandstone. 2) For UGS with the same sandstone, the deeper the burial depth, the stronger the compressive strength and deformation resistance, and the strength increase of dolomite due to confining pressure is the greatest. Comparison of mechanical parameters of sandstone and mud stone in P UGS, mudstone has slightly higher strength and deformation resistance than sandstone. 3) An increase in burial depth and a decrease in porosity and permeability can significantly enhance rock strength, with a positive correlation between elastic modulus and compressive strength. Fatigue experiments show that the strength of mudstone in deep UGS only decreases by 10% after 1 000 injections, while the strength fluctuation of mud stone in middle UGS reaches 20%. The deep cap rock is more suitable for high-pressure alternating loads. 4) Microstructure analysis reveals that dolomite has high strength due to dense intergranular cementation, while sandstone's porous structure and weak cementation result in weaker mechanical properties. The research results provide experimental support for long-term safe operation of UGS.

Key words: underground gas storage, rock mechanics, uniaxial compression experiment, triaxial compression experiment, lithological differences

CLC Number: