J4 ›› 2015, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4): 60-62.

• 预防医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种前处理方法测定菜籽油中6种金属元素含量的比较

  

  1. 大理学院公共卫生学院,云南大理671000
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-14 出版日期:2015-04-15 发布日期:2015-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 宋正蕊,高级实验师.
  • 作者简介:唐光花,预防医学专业2010级本科生.
  • 基金资助:

    大理学院大学生科研基金资助项目(KYSX2012035)

Comparison of Two Pretreatment Methods for Determination of the Content of 6 Metal Elements in
Rapeseed Oil

  1. College of Public Health, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671000, China
  • Received:2014-03-14 Online:2015-04-15 Published:2015-04-15

摘要:

目的:比较不同前处理方法对菜籽油中6种金属元素含量测定的影响。方法:分别使用干灰化法和湿消化法进行前处
理,并用火焰原子吸收分光光度法分别测定15个菜籽油样品中铅、镉、铜、铁等6种金属元素的含量。结果:干灰化法和湿消化
法处理后所测菜籽油样品中Pb、Cu含量差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),Fe、Mn含量差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。各元素的R2
均大于0.99,干灰化法的加标回收率81.90%~107.45%,湿消化法的加标回收率99.90%~108.05%。均满足痕量分析要求,相比
之下,干灰化法与湿消化法的加标回收率比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),且湿消化法-火焰原子吸收分光光度法测定油样
的回收率相对干灰化法的要高。结论: 两种方法都能获得准确的测定结果;湿消化法要优于干灰化法。

关键词: 前处理方法, 菜籽油, 金属元素, 火焰原子吸收法

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the effects of different pretreatment methods on determination of the content of 6 metal elements in
rapeseed oil. Methods: 15 samples of rapeseed oil were pretreated by dry ashing and wet digestion methods and the content of 6 kinds of metal elements such as lead, cadmium, cuprum and iron was determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry(FAAS). Results: After dry ashing and wet digestion treatments, the difference in the content of Pb and Cu had no statistical significance(P >0.05), but there was statistical significance in the difference in the content of Fe and Mn(P < 0.05). R2 of each element was over 0.99. The recovery rates of standard addition with the dry ashing method and with the wet digestion method were 81.90%-107.45% and 99.90%-108.05% respectively and satisfied the requirements of trace analysis. By contrast, the difference in recovery rates of standard addition between dry ashing and wet digestion methods was statistically significant(P < 0.05)and the recovery rate of the method of wet digestion and FAAS was higher than that of the dry ashing method. Conclusion: The accurate measuring result could be obtained by both methods but the wet digestion method was superior to the dry ashing method.

Key words: pretreatment, rapeseed oil, metal elements, flame atomic absorption spectrometry

中图分类号: