大理大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2): 67-74.DOI: 10. 3969 / j. issn. 2096-2266. 2025. 02. 014

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清标志物在慢性HBV感染自然史中的诊断价值研究

余文君1,余婷婷2,李丽华2,王红英2,普 冬2*   

  1. (1. 大理大学公共卫生学院,云南大理 671000; 2. 昆明市第三人民医院检验科,昆明 650041)
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-21 修回日期:2024-05-29 出版日期:2025-02-15 发布日期:2025-02-26
  • 通讯作者: 普冬,主任检验师,E-mail:ludipu@sina.com。
  • 作者简介:余文君,硕士研究生,主要从事公共卫生和肝病研究。
  • 基金资助:
    云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2023J0917);昆明市卫生健康委员会卫生科研课题项目(2021-11-01-0010);
    昆明市卫生科技人才培养项目(2023-SW(后备)-08)

Study on the Diagnostic Value of Serum Markers in the Natural History of Chronic HBV Infection

Yu Wenjun1, Yu Tingting2, Li Lihua2, Wang Hongying2, Pu Dong2*   

  1. (1. College of Public Health, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671000, China; 2 Department of Laboratory, Kunming Third People′s
    Hospital, Kunming 650041, China)
  • Received:2024-03-21 Revised:2024-05-29 Online:2025-02-15 Published:2025-02-26

摘要: 目的:评估血清标志物在慢性HBV感染自然史分期中的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2020年11月至2023年12月昆明
市第三人民医院收集的172例未经抗病毒治疗的慢性HBV感染患者的临床资料,根据慢性HBV感染的自然史将患者分为4
组,分别为EPI组、EPH组、ENI组和ENH组。比较各组患者血清标志物水平变化,并根据ROC曲线评估各指标对EPH期和
ENH期的诊断价值。结果:患者的年龄、RDW-SD、HBeAg、HBsAg、HBV DNA、HBV RNA、ALT、AST、GGT、PT、PTA、APRI、FIB-4
和GPR在不同组别间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对HBeAg阳性患者和HBeAg阴性患者分别进行单因素分析发现,EPI组和
EPH组患者在年龄、Hb、HBeAg、HBsAg、ALT、AST、GGT、AFP、APRI、FIB-4、GPR等指标上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ENI组
和ENH组患者在HBV DNA、HBV RNA、ALT、AST、GGT、APRI、GPR等指标上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显
示,多项血清标志物联合诊断预测EPH期和ENH期的诊断效能优于单一指标。结论:多种血清标志物联合诊断具有较高的临
床价值,有望为慢性HBV感染分期和抗病毒治疗的选择提供无创诊断支持。

关键词: 血清标志物, 乙型肝炎病毒, 感染, 自然史, 诊断价值

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum markers in the staging of chronic HBV infection throughout its
natural history. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 172 patients with chronic HBV infection, who
had not undergone antiviral treatment, collected from November 2020 to December 2023 at Kunming Third People′s Hospital . Based
on the natural history of chronic HBV infection, patients were classified into four groups: EPI, EPH, ENI, and ENH. Changes in serum
marker levels were compared among these groups, and the diagnostic value of each marker for the EPH and ENH stages was assessed
using ROC curve analysis. Results: Significant differences were observed among groups in age, RDW-SD, HBeAg, HBsAg, HBV
DNA, HBV RNA, ALT, AST, GGT, PT, PTA, APRI, FIB-4, and GPR levels (P<0.05). Univariate analysis for HBeAg-positive and
HBeAg-negative patients revealed significant differences between the EPI and EPH groups in age, Hb, HBeAg, HBsAg, ALT, AST,
GGT, AFP, APRI, FIB-4, and GPR levels( P<0.05). Similarly, significant differences were found between the ENI and ENH groups in
HBV DNA, HBV RNA, ALT, AST, GGT, APRI, and GPR levels( P<0.05). ROC curve analysis indicated that the combined diagnostic
prediction using multiple serum markers had a higher diagnostic efficiency for the EPH and ENH stages compared to individual
markers. Conclusion: The combined diagnosis of multiple serum markers has high clinical value and is expected to provide
noninvasive diagnostic support for the staging of chronic HBV infection and the selection of antiviral therapy.

Key words: serum markers, hepatitis B virus, infection, natural history, diagnostic value

中图分类号: