大理大学学报

• 政治学-社会学 • 上一篇    下一篇

刍议微观治理中人治与法治的关系#br#

  

  1. 河南财政金融学院
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-12 出版日期:2017-11-15 发布日期:2017-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 王喜峰,讲师,博士研究生,主要从事中国政府政治研究.

The Relationship between Ruling by Man and Ruling by Law in Microcosmic Governance#br#

  1. Henan Institute of Finance, Zhengzhou 450046, China
  • Received:2017-06-12 Online:2017-11-15 Published:2017-11-15

摘要:       人治与法治是社会治理的两种基本方式,二者对人类文明的进程都曾发挥过重要的作用。从本体论、认识论、方法论三个层面来界析人治和法治,便于我们对已经被过度泛化的人治与法治概念的理解和区分。只有这样才能够理解,为什么在全社会都在大力弘扬法治精神、践行法治领导方式时,人治作为治理手段仍有其存在的价值和意义。无论我们在人治与法治上持何种认识论,在本体论意义上,法治作为治国理政的根本方略必须坚定。但是,在方法论意义上,作为微观层面的单位治理,人治与法治是两种不同的治理方式,法治是本,人治是末;法治是常,人治是变;法治是体,人治是用,二者只有充分配合才能够达到理想的治理效果。

关键词: 微观治理, 人治, 法治

Abstract:         Ruling by man and ruling by law are two basic ways of social governance, and have been playing an important role in the    progress of human civilization. The present paper analyzes ruling by man and ruling by law from the three levels of ontology,  epistemology and methodology, in order to better understand and distinguish the two concept swhich have been over-generalized. Only  in this way can we understand why ruling by man as a means of governance still has its value when the whole society is vigorously  promoting the spirit of law and practicing the leadership of law. No matter what kind of epistemology is heldin understandingruling by man and ruling by law, the latter as a fundamental strategy of governing the country must beheld unswervingly in the sense of ontology.However, in microcosmic governance from themethodological respective, the two ways are different in that ruling by law is the root,normality, and substance, and ruling by man is the result, adaptation and function. Only the full integration of the two ways can lead to  ideal governance.
 

Key words: microcosmic governance, ruling by man, ruling by law