大理大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 82-85.DOI: 10. 3969 / j. issn. 2096-2266. 2021. 02. 018

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

血站酶免检测实验室质量监控指标分析方法探讨

刁丽波,梁艳娇   

  1. (大理白族自治州中心血站,云南大理671000)
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-08 修回日期:2020-06-18 出版日期:2021-02-15 发布日期:2021-03-17
  • 作者简介:刁丽波,主管检验师,主要从事血站血液检测及质量控制研究。

Discussion on the Analysis Method of Quality Control Index of ELISA Laboratories in Blood Stations

Diao Libo, Liang Yanjiao   

  1. (Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture Center Blood Station, Dali, Yunnan 671000, China)
  • Received:2020-05-08 Revised:2020-06-18 Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-03-17

摘要: 目的:分析酶免检测实验室检测数据,探讨通过质量监控指标监控检测质量,提高检测能力的方法。方法:统计分析
2018年1月— 2019年8月大理白族自治州中心血站酶免检测实验室的检测数据。统计各试剂复试/初试反应性率、同一试剂
各批次复试反应性率离散程度指标、各试剂每月检测反应性率分布情况。观察质量监控指标数值及折线图变化趋势,对酶免
检测工作进行回顾性分析。结果:共检测54 622份标本,使用酶免试剂8种62批次;复试/初试反应性率最高为51.88%(HBsAg
试剂2),最低为20.59%(抗-HCV试剂1);使用χ2 检验比较同一项目2种试剂的复试反应性率,HBsAg复试反应性率差异有统
计学意义(P<0.05),抗-HCV、抗-HIV和抗-TP复试反应性率差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。各试剂复试/初试反应性率>
35% 的有4种,同一试剂各批次复试反应性率离散程度指标中,CV<50% 的有5种。结论:通过对酶免检测实验室质量监控指
标的持续监控和阶段性、回顾性分析,有利于试验过程控制的评价及改进,逐步提高实验室检测质量。

关键词: 酶免检测, 质量监控指标, 分析

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the testing data of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)laboratories, and discuss the
methods to improve the testing ability by monitoring the testing quality through quality monitoring indicators. Method: The test data of
a laboratory from January 2018 to August 2019 were statistically analyzed. The retest/initial reactivity rate of each reagent, the
dispersion index of retest reactivity rate of each batch of the same reagent, and the monthly detection reactivity rate distribution of each
reagent were analyzed. The quality monitoring index values and the trend of changes in the line chart were observed, and a
retrospective analysis of the ELISA was conducted. Results: A total of 54 622 specimens were tested, using 62 batches of 8 ELISA
reagents; the highest retest/first test reactivity rate was 51.88%(HBsAg reagent 2), and the lowest was 20.59%(anti-HCV reagent 1).
Using χ2 test to compare the retest reactivity rate of two reagents in the same project, it was found that the reactivity rates of HBsAg
retests were statistically significant(P < 0.05), and the reactivity rates of anti-HCV, anti-HIV and anti-TP were not statistically
significant(P>0.05). There are 4 kinds of reagents with retest/initial test reactivity rate >35%, and among the index of dispersion
degree of retest rate of the same reagent in each batch, there are 5 types with CV < 50%. Conclusion: Through continuous monitoring
and periodic and retrospective analysis of the laboratory quality monitoring indicators of ELISA, it is conducive to the evaluation and
improvement of the test process control, and gradually improve the laboratory testing quality.

Key words: ELISA, quality monitoring indicators, analysis

中图分类号: