大理大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 101-109.DOI: 10. 3969 / j. issn. 2096-2266. 2021. 01. 016

• 法学-法治社会 • 上一篇    下一篇

智能社会中算法治理的法律控制研究

  

  1. 中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-22 修回日期:2022-09-19 出版日期:2023-01-15 发布日期:2023-01-08
  • 作者简介:杨利华,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事知识产权法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA139)

Research on the Legal Control over Algorithmic Governance in Intelligent Society

  1. School of Civil, Commercial and Economic Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2022-08-22 Revised:2022-09-19 Online:2023-01-15 Published:2023-01-08

摘要: 智能社会中随着算法技术的发展,运用算法进行社会治理逐渐受到治理主体的青睐,其中既包括提供公共服务的政府部门,也有作为私利主体的平台企业。相较于传统的治理方式,算法的治理效能能够适应复杂多变的社会环境,并且兼具高效性与准确性,促进了社会治理能力的提升和治理手段的创新。但与此同时,算法治理也带来了算法黑箱、算法歧视以及人格固化等现实风险,并对公众利益造成了负面影响,需要通过既有的法律规范和可行的制度设计来予以控制。在具体控制方式与路径选择上,应当充分考虑算法治理本身的复杂性和多元性,兼顾算法技术的创新发展与风险管控,从算法制定规范、算法运行监督和算法损害救济等方面着手实施。

关键词: 智能社会, 算法治理, 算法风险, 法律控制

Abstract:

With the development of algorithm technology in intelligent society the use of algorithms for social governance is gradually favored by governance subjects including both government departments that provide public services and private platform enterprises. Compared with the traditional mode of governance the efficiency of algorithmic governance can adapt to complex and changeable social environment and has both high efficiency and accuracy which promotes the improvement of governance capacity and the innovation of governance means. However algorithmic governance also brings about algorithm black box algorithmic discrimination and fixed personality causing negative impact on the public interest which needs to be prevented through existing law and possible institutional design at the same time. When choosing the specific controlling mode and way it is necessary to fully consider the complexity and diversity of algorithmic governance take into account both the innovative development of algorithm technology and risk control and implement it in the aspects of standard of algorithm formulation the supervision over algorithm operation and the relief of algorithm damage.

Key words:

intelligent society, algorithmic governance, algorithmic risk, legal control

 ,

中图分类号: