阐释学视野下的《山谷内集诗注》：从言到意的还原阐释

J4 ›› 2015, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1): 55-59.

阐释学视野下的《山谷内集诗注》：从言到意的还原阐释

四川大学文学与新闻学院，成都 610064

收稿日期:2014-10-05 出版日期:2015-01-15 发布日期:2015-01-15
作者简介:陆会琼，博士研究生，主要从事宋代文学、文献研究.

In the View of Hermeneutics of The Annotation of SHAN Gu's Internal Poetry Anthology:
From Annotation of the Superficial Language to the Reduction of the Significance

College of Literature and Journalism, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China

Received:2014-10-05 Online:2015-01-15 Published:2015-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

任渊《山谷内集诗注》是黄庭坚诗各注本中影响最大的，他运用大量术语展示黄诗的语料来源，对黄诗的语源、诗意原
型和句式结构等进行笺释，最终获得黄诗的意义。《山谷内集诗注》中术语的运用，使所注之词句在原诗中担任的修辞功能一目
了然，这让诗注兼有论诗的功能。《山谷内集诗注》旨在解决意图与表现之间的关系问题，即内在的“意”如何通过外在的“言”表
现出来。

Abstract:

The Annotation of SHAN Gu's Internal Poetry Anthology written by REN Yuan enjoys the greatest impact among other
commentaries of HUANG Tingjian's poetry. REN Yuan used a large number of terms to show the corpus sources of poem and analyzed the source of poetry language, the meaning of poetry prototype, the structure of the sentences, and finally obtained the meaning of the HUANG Tingjian's poetry. The use of the terms in The Annotation of SHAN Gu's Internal Poetry Anthology clearly showed the rhetorical function of annotation words in the original poem, which helped the annotation serve as poetry review. The purpose of The Annotation of SHAN Gu's Internal Poetry Anthology is to solve the problem of the relationship between intention and expression, that is how to express the "inherent meaning" through external "words".

中图分类号:

I206.2

陆会琼. 阐释学视野下的《山谷内集诗注》：从言到意的还原阐释[J]. J4, 2015, 14(1): 55-59.

Lu Huiqiong. In the View of Hermeneutics of The Annotation of SHAN Gu's Internal Poetry Anthology:
From Annotation of the Superficial Language to the Reduction of the Significance[J]. J4, 2015, 14(1): 55-59.

[1]	李云涛. 论李贽评点《水浒传》的原因及对小说思想、人物性格的肯定和赞扬[J]. J4, 2015, 14(11): 27-30.
[2]	王斌，艾茂莉. 《蜀中广记》中的曹学佺诗文辑考[J]. J4, 2015, 14(5): 49-55.
[3]	李潇云. 审美惊奇在中国古代文学中的艺术表现[J]. J4, 2015, 14(1): 50-54.
[4]	茶志高. 清代白族诗人赵淳与赵州诗学源流[J]. J4, 2014, 13(11): 17-21.
[5]	李美芳. 评王运生先生《庄子明辨》[J]. J4, 2012, 11(11): 48-51.
[6]	. 论欧阳修的赠序文[J]. J4, 2011, 10(9): 30-34.
[7]	顾勤. 张岱《西湖梦寻》的文化解读[J]. J4, 2011, 10(7): 53-55.
[8]	时亮. 《春秋》若干问题试析[J]. J4, 2011, 10(1): 47-49.
[9]	白建忠. “杨门六学士”漫议[J]. J4, 2010, 9(1): 51-54.