J4 ›› 2015, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (11): 50-54.

• 马克思主义理论-哲学 • 上一篇    下一篇

“事实-价值”鸿沟可以跨越吗?
——试论从情感主义到实用主义的伦理学趋向

  

  1. (华南师范大学公共管理学院,广州510006)
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-12 出版日期:2015-11-15 发布日期:2015-11-15
  • 作者简介:双修海,博士研究生,主要从事心灵哲学研究.

Can the Gap of "Fact-Value" Be Crossed: The Tendency of Ethics from Emotionalism to Pragmatism

  1. (College of Public Administration, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
  • Received:2015-04-12 Online:2015-11-15 Published:2015-11-15

摘要:

自休谟提出“是-应该”问题以来,“事实-价值”的鸿沟便横跨在人们面前,此鸿沟能否跨越或“事实-价值”推导是否可
能,成为伦理学关注的核心问题。20世纪50年代,艾耶尔等人的“情感主义”完全否定这种推导,从而使伦理学探讨陷入困
境。面对这一困局,普特南等人纷纷提出自己的挽救措施,使“事实-价值”推导成为可能,并使当代伦理学研究呈现“实用主
义”的转向。但是,这一转向并没有使事实与价值的关系问题得到最终的解答,而是从一个极端滑向另一个极端。

关键词: 事实-价值问题, 情感主义, 实用主义

Abstract:

Since Hume put forward the "Is-Ought Problem", the gap of "Fact-Value" and the questions appear: Can the gap be
crossed? Or, is the derivation of "fact-value" possible? These questions become the core problems that ethics concerned about. In
1950s, "emotionalism" of Ayer et al. denied this derivation completely, so the discussion of the investigation of ethics is in a tight
corner. Faced with this dilemma, Putnam et al. who have come up with their own rescue measures, made the derivation of "fact-value"
possible, and changed the research direction of contemporary ethics which held the "pragmatism". However, the change did not make
the problem of the relationship between fact and value find the final answer, but slid from one extreme to the other extreme.

Key words: issue of fact-value, emotionalism, pragmatism

中图分类号: