Journal of Dali University ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (7): 1-9.DOI: 10. 3969 / j. issn. 2096-2266. 2026. 07. 001
Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract: Since the 1970s and 1980s, the study of material culture has evolved into an interdisciplinary field, with its scope expanding from man-made objects to natural and virtual entities. In the ontological turn, it has highlighted the agency of "things", thereby forming an object-centred cognitive framework. The theoretical framework encompasses both diachronic and synchronic dimensions: the diachronic dimension examines the evolution from artifacts and commodities to technological objects; the synchronic dimension encompasses multiple perspectives, including the objects themselves, exchange, symbolism and social mentality. Perspectives from political economy, symbolic theory and ontology are integrated within the framework of the social life of things, deepening our understanding of the relationship between humans and objects. Methodologically, the research is grounded in anthropological fieldwork and ethnography, combined with multidisciplinary approaches from history, archaeology and other fields to construct multiple chains of evidence. Looking ahead, this field will continue to leverage its interdisciplinary strengths, expanding into emerging topics such as artificial intelligence and digital materiality, deepening the exploration of non-human actors, and continuously advancing our understanding of a world interwoven with objects and humans.
Key words:  , material culture, theory, methodology, multidisciplinary
CLC Number:
G122
Li Taohong. A Critical Review of Theories in Material Culture Studies[J]. Journal of Dali University, 2026, 11(7): 1-9.
/ / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dlxyzk/EN/10. 3969 / j. issn. 2096-2266. 2026. 07. 001
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dlxyzk/EN/Y2026/V11/I7/1
朱健刚,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2010:5-10.
〔22〕 麦克法兰. 绿色黄金:茶叶的故事〔M〕. 杨淑玲,沈桂 凤,译. 汕头:汕头大学出版社,2006:131-150. 〔23〕 华生. 金拱向东:麦当劳在东亚〔M〕. 祝鹏程,译. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社,2015:46-50. 〔24〕 埃尔莫尔. 可口可乐帝国:一部资源掠夺史〔M〕. 林相 森,张雪媛,译. 上海:格致出版社,2018:1-6. 〔25〕 Eduardo Viveiros De Castro,Cannibal Metaphysics. For a Post-structural Anthropology〔M〕. Translated by Peter Skafish,University of Minnersota Press,2014:43-48. 〔26〕 Eduardo Kohn. How Forests Think:Toward an Anthropol⁃ ogy Beyond the Human〔M〕. University of California Press,2013:221-228. 〔27〕 Bruno Latour. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence:An An⁃ thropology of the moderns〔M〕. Translated by Catherine Porter,Harvard University Press,2013:27-45. 〔28〕 张文义. 景颇鬼鸡是什么味道?人类学三次元视野下 的记忆、想象与味觉经验的不可言说〔J〕. 开放时代, 2019(5):190-202. 〔29〕 罗安清. 末日松茸:资本主义废墟世界中的生活可 能〔M〕. 张晓佳,译. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2020: 143-160. 〔30〕 让·鲍德里亚. 消费社会〔M〕. 刘成富,全志钢,译. 南 京:南京大学出版社,2001:2. 〔31〕 丹尼尔·米勒. 物质文化与大众消费〔M〕. 费文明,朱晓 宁,译. 南京:江苏美术出版社,2010:131-152. 〔32〕 拉图尔. 我们从未现代过:对称性人类学论集〔M〕. 刘 鹏,安涅思,译. 上海:上海文艺出版社,2022:286-292. 〔33〕 戈尔德·莱昂哈德. 人机冲突:人类与智能世界如何共 处〔M〕. 张尧然,高艳梅,译. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2019:7-20. 〔34〕 Richardson,Jane,A. L. Kroeber. Three Centuries of Women's Dress Fashions:A Quantitative Analysis〔J〕. Anthropological Records,1940,5(2):111-153. 〔35〕 张经纬. 博物馆里的极简中国史〔M〕. 北京:北京联合 出版公司,2022:232-236. 〔36〕 阎云翔. 礼物的流动:一个中国村庄中的互惠原则与社 会网络〔M〕. 李放春,刘瑜,译. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2000. 〔37〕 马文·哈里斯. 好吃:食物与文化之谜〔M〕. 叶舒宪,户 晓辉,译. 济南:山东画报出版社,2001:263-277. 〔38〕 Scottlash. Another Modernity:A Different Rationality〔M〕. Oxford:Blackwell,1999:339-346. 〔39〕 周雨霏. 人与动物伦理关系研究的方法与中国经 验〔J〕. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,41 (6):68-78. 〔40〕 Miller,Daniel. Material Culture and Mass Consump⁃ tion〔M〕. Oxford:Blackwell,1987:133-157. 〔41〕 徐敏,汪民安. 物质文化与当代日常生活变迁〔M〕. 北 京:北京大学出版社,2018:94-108. 〔42〕 舒瑜. 物的生命传记:读《物的社会生命:文化视野中的 商品》〔J〕. 社会学研究,2007(6):223-234. 〔43〕 杨涛,吴国清. 物的社会生命:人情伦理与等级秩序 ——兼论《礼物的流动》〔J〕. 南京理工大学学报,2008 (1):71-74. 〔44〕 舒瑜. 微“盐”大义:云南诺邓盐业的历史人类学考 察〔M〕. 北京:世界图书出版公司,2010:245-257.