J4 ›› 2016, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2): 34-37.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Objective: To compare the application of sevoflurane inhalation and ketamine combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia in the transcatheter closure for children with congenital heart diseasen, and to discuss the feasibility and safety of using sevoflurane inhalation. Methods: Sixty children, aged 2 to 5 years old, body weight 8- 14 kg, ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ, with pediatric interventional therapy were randomly divided into two groups: sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia group (sevoflurane group) and ketamine combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia group(ketamine group). Sevoflurane group were anesthesia induction with 8% sevoflurane(oxygen flow rate at 6 L/min)and anesthesia maintenance with 2%-3%sevoflurane(oxygen flow rate 2 L/min).Ketamine group were anesthesia induction with 1.5~2.0 mg/kg ketamine intravenously and anesthesia maintenance with 25~30 μg/(kg·min)ketamine, 1.5-2.0 mg/(kg·h)propofol trace pump injection continuously. SBP, DBP, HR, SpO2, anesthesia induction time, recovery time,and postoperative complications were recorded and investigated. Results: There were no differences between general information and operation time in two groups. The sedation and analgesia effect were satisfactory in all patients, and no case was changed to tracheal intubation. The induction time in two groups were not significantly different. But the postoperative recovery time,orientation recovery time in sevoflurane group were shorter than that in ketamine group(P< 0.05). There was no statistic significant difference on consciousness limb activity between sevoflurane group(3 cases, 10%)and ketamine group(5 cases,17%). The two groups were free of cough, adverse respiratory inhibition, laryngospasm and bronchospasm. The incidence of agitation during emergence in sevoflurane group(10% 3 cases)was significantly lower than that in the ketamine group(17%, 5 cases)(P < 0.05). Conclusion: Sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia, with little influence on circulation and respiration, could achieve satisfactory analgesia and sedation, is safe and effective in interventional therapy of children with congenital heart disease.
Key words: sevoflurane, children, congenital heart disease, interventional
CLC Number:
R614.2+1
Geng Jiachen , Wang Wenfa, Zhou Xingyue, Shi Linchun. Application of Sevoflurane Inhalation in Transcatheter Closure for Children with Congenital Heart Disease[J]. J4, 2016, 15(2): 34-37.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dlxyzk/EN/
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dlxyzk/EN/Y2016/V15/I2/34
〔1〕戴锦艳,方方,王焱,等.七氟醚用于小儿门诊手术的临 床研究〔J〕.临床麻醉学杂志,2010(12):1077-1078. 〔2〕王新河,邵云,李刚.七氟醚全凭吸入麻醉在婴儿唇裂整 复术中的应用〔J〕.临床麻醉学杂志,2011,27(2):160- 162. 〔3〕潘立东,洪云霞,胡智勇,等.小儿先天性心脏病经心导 管介入治疗的麻醉管理〔J〕. 浙江医学,2003,25(3): 169-170. 〔4〕李丽伟,马南,艾艳秋,等. 小儿先天性心脏病介入治疗 26 例麻醉处理〔J〕. 郑州大学学报(医学版),2004,39 (5):908-909. 〔5〕庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学〔M〕. 3版.北京:人 民卫生出版社,2003:446-447. 〔6〕雷黎明,张文胜,刘进,等.七氟醚的临床研究及进展〔J〕. 四川解剖学杂志,2006,14(3):45-47. 〔7〕李甲连,杨承祥,梁桦,等.小儿七氟醚麻醉诱导方法的 比较〔J〕.临床麻醉学杂志,2010,26(3):209-211. 〔8〕尤新民,吴韬,金熊元.氯胺酮复合丙泊酚用于乳腺活 检手术的临床观察〔J〕. 临床麻醉学杂志,2002,18(2): 100-101. 〔9〕INOMATA S,MAEDA T,SHIMIZU T,et al. Effects of fen?
tanyl infusion on tracheal intubation and emergence agita? tion in preschool children anaesthetized with sevoflu? rane〔J〕. Br J Anaesth,2010,105(3):361-367. 〔10〕王瑾,景亮,吴琼. 静注曲马多预防七氟醚吸入麻醉患 儿术后躁动的临床观察〔J〕. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2008,27(4):294-296. 〔11〕潘志英,宋惠菊,王祥瑞,等.丙泊酚静注辅助芬太尼滴 鼻对七氟醚全麻术后躁动的影响〔J〕. 临床麻醉学杂 志,2012,28(5):483-484. 〔12〕PLOWMAN A,BARSON J. Sevoflurane or halothane for paediatric endoscopy〔J〕. Br J Anaesth,1997,79:143- 144.