Assessment Development Trends and Revelations of Children with Learning Disability in
the United States: An Analysis Based on Process and Strategy

Abstract

Abstract:

The assessment of children with learning disability（LD）in the United States has paid much more attention on the process
and strategy. Response to Intervention（RTI）and the "third way" both reflect the process- oriented trend of learning disability
assessment. As to the assessment strategy, a combination of multidisciplinary assessment methods and the idea of comprehensive
assessment are getting attention. The development of LD assessment should be a useful reference for the study of LD in China.

Key words: learning disability, Response to Intervention（RTI）, cognitive process, comprehensive assessment

CLC Number:

G515

Li Fanglu. Assessment Development Trends and Revelations of Children with Learning Disability in
the United States: An Analysis Based on Process and Strategy[J]. J4, 2016, 1(7): 94-100.

References

1〕CORTIELLA C. The State of Learning Disability〔EB/OL〕.
（2011-07-27）〔2016-01-10〕.http：//www.ncld.org/stateofld.
〔2〕DANIEL P HALLAHAN，JAMES M KAUFFMAN，PAIGE
C PULLEN. 特殊教育导论〔M〕. 11版. 北京：中国人民出
版社，2010：167.
〔3〕ANGELA PASCOPELLA. RTI Goes Mainstream〔J〕. Dis?
trict Administration，2010（April）：45-49.
〔4〕杨希洁，韦小满. 为全体学生提供有效的教育服务：“干
预反应”模式的发展及影响〔J〕. 中国特殊教育，2012
（6）：3-10.
〔5〕NICOLF O FIESH. Response to Intervention and the Identi?
fication of Specific Learning Disabilities：Why We Need
Comprehensive Evaluations as Part of the Process〔J〕. Psy?
chology in the Schools，2006（8）：883-888.
〔6〕LINDY CRAWFORD. The Role of Assessment in a Re?
sponse to Intervention Model〔J〕. Preventing School Fail?
ure：Alternative Education for Children and Youth，2014，
58（4）：230-236.
〔7〕CECIL R REYNOLDS，SALLY E SHAYWITZ. Response
to Intervention：Ready or Not? Or，From Wait-to-Fail to
Watch-Them-Fail〔J〕. School Psychology Quarterly，2009，
24（2）：130-145.
〔8〕FUCHS D，MOCK D，MORGAN P，et al. Responsivenessto-
intervention：Definitions，evidence，and implications for
the learning disabilities construct〔J〕. Learning Disabilities
Research & Practice，2003，18（3）：157-171.
〔9〕National Center on Response to Intervention. Essential
Components of RTI -A Closer Look at Response to Inter?
vention〔EB/OL〕.（2015-09-28）〔2016-01-10〕. http：//
www. rti4success. org.
〔10〕CHARLES A HUGHES，DOUGLAS D DEXTER. Re?
sponse to Intervention：A Research-Based Summary〔J〕.
Theory Into Practice，2011，50（1）：4-11.
〔11〕DOUGLAS FUCHS，LYNN S FUCHS. Responsiveness to
Intervention：Multilevel Assessment and Instruction as
Early Intervention and Disability Identification〔J〕. The
Reading Teacher，2009（11）：250-252.
〔12〕WHITNEY DONALDSON. What is RTI and What are the
Essential Components that must be Present?〔EB/OL〕.
（2015-09-28）〔2016-01-10〕. http：//www. rti4success.
org/video/what-rti-and-what-are-essential-componentsmust-
be-present.
〔13〕邓猛，林潇潇. 干预反应模式下学障资优生的鉴定、评
估与干预〔J〕. 教育研究与实验，2014（3）：63-68.
〔14〕RESCHLY D J. Learning Disabilities Identification：Pri?
mary Intervention，Secondary Intervention，and Then
What?〔J〕. Journal of Learning Disabilities，2005（38）：
510-515.
〔15〕JAMES B HALE，ALAN KAUFMAN，JACK A NAGL?
IERI，et al. Implementation of Idea：Integrating Response
to Intervention and Cognitive Assessment Methods〔J〕.
Psychology in the Schools，2006，43（7）：53-770.

〔16〕HALE J，ALFONSO V，BERNINGER V，et al. Critical Is?
sues in Response-To-Intervention，Comprehensive Evalu?
ation，and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification
and Intervention：An Expert White Paper Consensus〔J〕.
Learning Disability Quarterly，2010，33（3）：223-236.
〔17〕牟晓宇，昝飞. 美国特殊儿童学业困难反应模式：RTI
模式〔J〕. 外国教育研究，2011（4）：54-59.
〔18〕JOHN O WILLIS，RON DUMONT. And Never the Twain
Shall Meet：Can Response to Intervention and Cognitive
Assessment be Reconciled?〔J〕. Psychology in the Schools，
2006，43（8）：901-908.
〔19〕JACK A NAGLIERI. Current Advances in Assessment
and Intervention for Children with Learning Disabili?
ties〔J〕. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities，
2003（1）：163-190.
〔20〕DOUGLAS FUCHS，DEVERY MOCK，PAUL L. Morgan.
Responsiveness- to- Intervention：Definitions，Evidence，
and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct〔J〕.
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice，2003，18
（3）：157-171.
〔21〕SEMRUD CLIKEMAN M. Neuropsychological Aspects for
EvaluatingLearning Disabilities〔J〕. Journal of Learning
Disabilities，2005（38）：563-568.
〔22〕CATHERINE A FIORELLO，JAMES B HALE. Cognitive
Hypothesis Testing and Response to Intervention for Chil?
dren with Reading Problems〔J〕. Psychology in the Schools，
2006，43（8）：835-853.
〔23〕DAWN P FLANAGAN. Wechsler- Based CHC Cross-
Battery Assessment and Reading Achievement：Strength?
ening the Validity of Interpretations Drawn from Wechsler
Test Scores〔J〕. School Psychology Quarterly，2000，15
（3）：295-329.
〔24〕孙英红，佟月华. 假设检验CHC模式：特定学习障碍评
估的新方法〔J〕. 中国特殊教育，2013（2）：57-63.
〔25〕National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities . Com?
prehensive Assessment and Evaluation of Students With
Learning Disabilities〔EB/OL〕.（2010- 06- 01）〔2015-
10-19〕. http：//www. ldonline. org/about/partners/njcld.
〔26〕夏峰，谭和平. 中国特殊教育新进展（2000-2010）〔M〕.
北京：高等教育出版社，2013：170-182.
〔27〕曾守锤. 对学习障碍个体内差异鉴别和诊断方法的几
点批评〔J〕. 外国中小学教育，2003（10）：29-33.