西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 72-79.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.07.23.03

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

论人民陪审制的完善
——以司法去行政化为目的

姚慧   

  1. 南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023
  • 出版日期:2015-03-01 发布日期:2015-03-01
  • 作者简介:姚慧(1988 –),女(汉族),山东聊城人,硕士研究生,研究方向:民事诉讼法学。

The Improvement of People’s Jury System
——For the Purpose of Deadministration in Judicatory

Yao Hui   

  1. School of Law,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210023,China
  • Online:2015-03-01 Published:2015-03-01

摘要:

行政权对于司法权的干预已然成为阻碍司法内部独立的根源。在司法实践中,司法的行政化严重制约了人民
陪审制度价值的有效实现,人民陪审制的虚化亦为司法行政化的滋长提供了空间。人民陪审制度衍生出来的陪审权
的存在,可以分割审判权,阻隔行政权对于审判权的直接作用,并间接实现司法去行政化的目的。目前,我国人民陪审
制度的一些缺陷客观上造成了“陪而不审,合而不议”的现状,我们应从以下几方面完善人民陪审制度:在参审制模式
的基础上,适当借鉴陪审制模式的经验,合理调整人民陪审员与法官在审判过程中的侧重点,让人民陪审员在事实认
定上发挥主导作用,而在法律适用上由法官主导;增加合议庭中人民陪审员的人数,实现由“少数人参审”到“多数人
参审”的转变;把人民陪审员的观点写进判决中。通过人民陪审制度的完善,必然能够改变司法行政化对于人民陪审
制的负面影响,进而促进司法的去行政化,这不失为实现司法内部独立的一种有效途径。

关键词: 司法内部独立, 人民陪审制度, 人民陪审员, 司法行政化, 审判统一

Abstract:

The interference of administrative power in judicial power has been the root of impediment to the internal judicial independence.
In juridical practice,judicatory under the administrative influence has seriously restricted the effective realization
of the value of people’s jury system,and the weakened People’s jury system has also provided a space for the rise of administrative
influence on judicatory. At present,some of the defects in people’s jury system in China caused the phenomenon of
“accompany but not judge,collaborate but not disagree”. The author suggest that the people’s jury system should be improved
in the following several aspects: on the basis of assessor system mode,the focuses of the people’s juror and the judge during
the judicial process should be adjusted by taking lessons from the experience of the jury system model,so that the people’s
juror play a major role in fact-finding and the judge in the application of law;the number of people’s assessors in a collegiate
panel should be increased to realize the change from“juror in minority”to“juror in majority”;and the viewpoint of people’s
juror should also be included in the judgment. The improvement of people’s jury system surly can soften the negative impact
of the judicatory under administrative influence on people’s jury system and promote the de-administration in judicial power.
Therefore,the improvement of people’s jury system can be an effective way to realize judicial internal independence.

Key words: internal judicial independence;people&rsquo, s jury system;people&rsquo, s juror;judicatory with administrative characteristic;
unity of interrogation and judgment