西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 105-111.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2023.09.04.01

• 理论探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

由朱子论“钦”观其“尧舜之道”

魏子钦   

  1. 安徽大学哲学学院, 安徽 合肥 230039
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-04 发布日期:2024-01-24
  • 作者简介:魏子钦(1996-),男(汉族),吉林吉林人,博士研究生,研究方向:儒学与中国哲学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“明清桐城方氏学派哲学思想研究”(19BZX059)。

Zhu Zi’s Idea on the “Ways of Yao and Shun” Reflected in His Comment on “qin

WEI Ziqin   

  1. Department of Philosophy, Anhui University, Hefei Anhui, 230039, China
  • Received:2023-09-04 Published:2024-01-24

摘要: 为了挑战佛道的圣人观,朱子以“敬”字阐释《尚书》“钦”字,以实现其对“尧舜之道”理学圣人观的构建。从工夫修养看,朱子认为持守“钦”方看得道理尽,指出佛老工夫论过于关注心地、忽略现实的缺失问题。从体用关系看,朱子认为以“钦”体“明”用,反对佛老以“静”释“敬”,以致发展出体用殊绝之弊。从圣贤境界看,朱子认为尧之德“钦”是第一个字,而佛老自谓光明,实是扰乱人伦。总体而言,朱子对“钦”的理学阐释,旨在揭示儒家与佛老何者为本,批判其持敬工夫、敬之本体及光明境界,敞开了程朱理学视域下的“尧舜之道”。

关键词: 经典诠释, 朱子, 钦, 三教辩证, 圣人观

Abstract: Zhu Zi explained the meaning of the word "qin" in Shang Shu as "jing(reverential)" to establish his Neo-Confucianist view on the "Ways of Yao and Shun". From the perspective of the cultivation of "qin", Zhu Zi commented that "qin" enables a thorough understanding of things and that Buddhists and Taoists focuse too much on the mental state instead of the problems in reality. In terms of the ti-yong relationship, Zhu Zi held that "qin" provides the basis on which "ming(intelligence)" depends, and opposed the Buddhist and Taoist explanations of "qin" as "jing(tranquility)" which isolated ti and yong(the ontological existence and the expression and application). From the perspective of the virtues of the sage, Zhu Zi noted that "qin" comes first and is the most important, while what the Buddhist and Taoist claims to be the fundamental are actually false understanding. Zhu Zi’s interpretation of "qin" aims to criticize the Buddhist and Taoist thoughts and clarify the "ways of Yao and Shun" from the Neo-Confucianist perspective.

Key words: classical interpretation, Zhu Zi, qin, dialectical reflections on Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism, views on the sages

中图分类号: