西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 80-86.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2013.03.015

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

新媒体视野下媒介审判与司法公正的博弈 ——以“药家鑫案”为例

商登珲   

  1. 西南政法大学经济法学院,重庆 401120
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2013-05-01 发布日期:2013-05-01

Relations Between Media Trial and Judicial Justice in the Context of New Media —Taking “Yao’s Case” as an Example

SHANG Deng-hui   

  1. School of Economic Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2013-05-01 Published:2013-05-01

摘要: 近年来,以对2011年“药家鑫故意杀人案”的报道为典型代表的媒介介入司法领域现象,反映出媒介利用自身优势,对案件事实进行夸大甚至虚假报导,激发公众的非理性情绪,造成强大的社会舆论,对司法公正产生了诸多不良的影响,形成了事实上的媒介审判,偏离了媒介监督的宗旨。要形成媒介监督与司法公正的良性互动,必须加强立法,限制媒介审判;同时提高司法机构公正司法的能力和媒介素质,并通过各种方式提高公众素质。

关键词: 媒介审判, 媒介监督, 司法独立, 司法公正, “药家鑫案”

Abstract: In recent years,media intervention in judicial cases,which is represented by media reports on Yao Jiaxin’s intentional homicide case in 2011,has reflected that the media’s exaggerated and even false reports on some law cases has stimulated public sentiment which resulted in an irrational climate of public opinion,and has exerted many adverse effects on the judicial justice. Such reports are actually media trials which is not the purpose of media supervision. In order to form the positive interaction between media supervision and judicial justice,we must strengthen legislation to restrain media trial. We must also improve judicial establishments’ ability to administer judicial justice,media quality,and the quality of the public through a variety of ways at the same time.

Key words: media trial, media supervision, judicial independence, judicial justice, “Yao’s case”

中图分类号: