西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)
• 论文 • 上一篇 下一篇
袁明宝
出版日期:
发布日期:
基金资助:
国家社科基金青年项目“增强和扩大党在农村的阶层基础和群众基础研究”(12cks016)
YUAN Ming-bao
Online:
Published:
摘要:
在城市化快速推进背景下,征地拆迁成为推动农村发展和基层治理的重要因素,它不仅带来利益密集,更改变了基层治理逻辑。以鄂西Y村为例,分析了精英替换现象,即传统精英面临着各种征地拆迁难题而逐渐退出治理结构和权力结构,新兴精英依靠经济、社会资本进入到体制内,利用“私”的逻辑解决征地拆迁产生的钉子户难题和上访户等公共事务。并指出精英替换虽然解决了征地拆迁中的众多问题,但从长远来看,可能会造成对基层社会利益的侵蚀和对基层合法性的消解。
关键词: 征地拆迁, 基层治理, 精英替换, 传统精英, 新兴精英
Abstract:
With the rapid development of urbanization,land requisition and demolishing has become an important factor in promoting rural development and in grassroots governance. It not only brings about intensive interests but also changes the logic of grassroots governance. This paper analyzes the phenomenon of elite alternation by taking a village in west Hubei as an example,where the traditional elites are encountered with various problems in land requisition and demolishing and secede from the governance system,while the emerging elites enter into the system supported by their economic and social capital. They solve public affairs such as the “nail households” caused by land requisition and demolishing and the “petition households” by taking advantage of their personal resources. We think that although such elite alternation has contributed to the solution of various problems in land requisition and demolishing,it may lead to the erosion of grassroots social interests and the decomposition of the legality of grassroots.
Key words: land requisition and demolishing, grassroots governance, elite alternation, traditional elites, emerging elites
袁明宝. 征地拆迁、利益密集与基层治理中的精英替换逻辑 ——以鄂西Y村为例[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版).
YUAN Ming-bao. Land Requisition,Intensive Interests and Alternation of Elites in Village Governance —A Case Study of Village Y in West Hubei Province[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版).
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/CN/
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/CN/Y2014/V16/I1/30
[1]陈江龙,曲福田.土地征用的理论分析及我国征地制度改革[J].江苏社会科学,2002(2):55-59. [2]汪晖.城乡结合部的土地征用:征用权与征地补偿[J].中国农村经济,2002(2):40-46. [3]陈柏峰.土地发展权的理论基础与制度前景[J].法学研究,2012(4):99-114. [4]许坚.论我国两种性质的征地补偿标准[J].中国土地科学,1996(S1):66-69. [5]黄祖辉,汪晖.非公共利益性质的征地行为与土地发展权补偿[J].经济研究,2002(5):66-71. [6]钱忠好,曲福田.中国土地征用制度:反思与改革[J].中国土地科学,2004(5):5-11. [7]刘国臻.中国土地发展权论纲[J].学术研究,2005(10):64-68. [8]周诚.关于我国农地转非自然增值分配理论的新思考[J].农业经济问题,2006(12):4-7. [9]茅于轼.恢复农民对土地财产的所有权[N].建设市场报,2009-02-16(B3). [10]文贯中.市场畸形发育、社会冲突与现行的土地制度[J].经济社会体制比较,2008(2):45-51. [11]于建嵘,陈志武.把地权还给农民——于建嵘对话陈志武[J].东南学术,2008(2):12-18. [12]秦晖.农民地权六论[J].社会科学论坛,2007(5):122-146. [13]温铁军.农民社会保障与土地制度改革[J].学习月刊,2006(19):20-22. [14]姚洋.中国农地制度:一个分析框架[J]中国社会科学,2000(2):54-65. [15]陈锡文.让农民自己为土地做主[N].南方周末,2001-11-01(2). [16]贺雪峰.地权的逻辑[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2010:106-107. [17]李昌平.扩大农民地权及其制度建设[J].中国图书评论,2009(1):12-19. [18]贺雪峰.论利益密集型农村地区的治理[J].政治学研究,2011(6):47-56. [19]袁明宝.接点治理:理解国家与农民关系的新视角[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2012(3):72-79. [20]仝志辉,贺雪峰.村庄权力结构的三层分析——兼论选举后村级权力的合法性[J].中国社会科学,2002(1):158-167.