西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2): 80-83.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.02.014

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国行政诉讼类型化研究

莫张勤   

  1. 西南政法大学经济法学院 ,重庆 401120
  • 出版日期:2014-03-01 发布日期:2014-03-01

Research on the Categorization of Administrative Litigation in China

MO Zhang-qin   

  1. School of Economic Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China
  • Online:2014-03-01 Published:2014-03-01

摘要:

目前,我国法律还没有确立行政诉讼的类型化,其不利后果表现为:不能全方位保障行政相对人的合法权益、不利于实现程序经济、不利于行政权与司法权之间矛盾的解决。我国学术界对于建立我国行政诉讼类型化有着多种观点与学说,其中,以“诉讼请求的内容”为划分标准的“三类说”最为可取。以“诉讼请求的内容”为划分标准,可将行政诉讼划分为:行政撤销诉讼、行政给付诉讼和行政确认诉讼三种基本类型。

关键词: 行政诉讼, 诉讼类型, 诉讼类型化, 行政主体, 行政相对人

Abstract:

At present,administrative litigation is not categorized in China,which causes serious problems in overall safeguarding legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart,in achieving procedural economy,and in settling contradictions between executive power and jurisdiction. There are various views and theories in Chinese academia about the categonization of administrative litigation. Among them the most favorable is the “threecategory” theory which takes litigation content as the criteria of categorization. According to the theory,administration litigation can be categorized into the following three categories: annulment of a specific administrative act,compensation for infringement of the lawful rights and interests of a specific administrative counterpart,and verdict of whether a specific administrative act is legal or not.

Key words: administration litigation, litigation category, litigation categorization, administrative subject, administrative counterparts