西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 46-63.

• 政治与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

“互不挖角协议”反垄断法规制的困境及对策

吴太轩, 于辰旭   

  1. 西南政法大学经济法学院, 重庆, 渝北区 401120
  • 发布日期:2025-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 于辰旭,西南政法大学经济法学院硕士研究生,研究方向:竞争法、网络法。
  • 作者简介:吴太轩,西南政法大学经济法学院副教授,博士,研究方向:竞争法、网络法。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字经济时代竞争政策定位与反垄断问题研究”(23&ZD076);国家社会科学基金项目“个人信息的竞争法保护疑难问题研究”(23BFX186);重庆市研究生科研创新项目“数字平台滥用公共性的反垄断法规制研究”(CYB23182)。

The Anti-monopoly Regulation Dilemma in the “No-Poaching Agreements” and Countermeasures

WU Taixuan, YU Chenxu   

  1. School of Economic Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Yubei Chongqing, 401120, China
  • Published:2025-01-25

摘要: 继欧美等国家和地区之后,我国首次针对“互不挖角协议”开展反垄断执法活动。“互不挖角协议”所引发的竞争损害显著,反垄断法对其规制不仅匹配制度逻辑,更契合国内外实践趋势。然而,当下反垄断法规制仍存在价值取向上忽视劳动者利益保护,行为认定上偏重横向垄断协议路径与执法过程上缺乏事前合规监管的困境。要破解这一困境,亟须坚持保护竞争过程以调适价值理念,构设双重规制路径以改进行为认定,建立事前合规制度以前迁执法过程,从而不断完善“互不挖角协议”的反垄断法规制。

关键词: 互不挖角协议, 反垄断法, 劳动力市场, 垄断协议, 滥用市场支配地位

Abstract: The "no-poaching agreement" violates the spirit of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the "Anti-Monopoly Law"), and anti-monopoly law enforcement activities against the "no-poaching agreement" outside the country are increasing. The damage to competition caused by the "no-poaching agreement" is significant, and its regulation in the Anti-Monopoly Law conforms not only to the institutional logic, but also to the practice trend at home and abroad. However, However, in regulating "no-poaching agreements", antitrust laws are in the dilemma of improper value orientation, neglect of protection of employee interests, poor behavior identification, emphasis on monopoly agreement path and fragmentation of law enforcement process, and lack of ex ante regulation. To solve this dilemma, it is urgent to adjust the value concept, adhere to protection of competition process, construct a dual regulation path, and to establish a pre-compliance system to promote the anti-monopoly regulation of "non-poaching agreement".

Key words: no-poaching agreements, antitrust law, labor market, monopoly agreements, abuse of market dominance

中图分类号: