西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

分公司的当事人能力研究
——以劳动争议案件为例

徐科琼 付建勇   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学马克思主义学院,四川成都610500;2. 成都市新都区人民法院,四川成都610500
  • 出版日期:2015-03-01 发布日期:2015-03-01
  • 作者简介:徐科琼(1973 –),女(汉族),四川南充人,副教授,硕士,研究方向:民商法学。

Branch Company’s Capacity of Litigation
——A Case Study of Labor Disputes

Xu Ke - qiong Fu Jian - yong   

  1. 1. School of Marxism,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu Sichuan,610500,China;
    2. People’s Court of Xindu District,Chengdu Sichuan,610500,China
  • Online:2015-03-01 Published:2015-03-01

摘要:

分公司是否具有单独的当事人能力,是一个有争议的问题。不论是《德国民事诉讼法》仅仅认可分公司的消
极当事人能力,还是《日本民事诉讼法》同时认可其积极当事人能力,均是基于便利当事人诉讼的实践理性考量的结
果。认可分公司单独的当事人能力,再辅之以执行程序中基于既判力主观范围间接扩张的被执行主体变更与追加制
度,是一种逻辑自洽、体系化的路径。否定分公司单独的当事人能力的观点,不仅误读了分公司不能独立承担民事责
任的实体法规定,也忽视了民事诉讼法为何需要赋予分公司当事人能力的理论思考前提。劳动争议案件有其特殊性,
如否定分公司单独的当事人能力,不仅完全违反“程序当事人”的法理和立法规定,而且与司法解释及司法实践中所肯
定个体工商户和保险公司分支机构可以为单独的诉讼当事人的现实相矛盾。

关键词: 分公司, 程序当事人, 当事人能力, 权利能力, 劳动争议

Abstract:

There have been controversies over whether branch companies have in dependent capacity of litigation. Both
the German Code of Civil Procedure,which approbates the passive capacity of litigation of branch companies,and the Civil
Procedural Law of Japan,which approbates the positive capacity of litigation of branch companies,are the results of rational
considerations of facilitating the litigants. It’s a systematic path with self-consistent logic to approbate branch company’s
independent capacity of litigation with auxiliary system of subject change and addition in enforcement procedure which is based
on indirect expansion of the subjective scope of res judicata. Denying branch company’s independent capacity of litigation is
not only a misinterpretation of the provisions of substantive law that branch company cannot bear independent civil liability but
also ignores the theoretical reasons why the civil procedure law gives branch company the capacity of litigation. Although labor
dispute cases have particularity of their own,denying the branch company’s independent capacity of litigation in dealing with
such cases is totally against the legal theory and legislative requirements about“parties to the proceedings”,and contradict the
judicial interpretation and judicial practice,which accept individual businesses and branch insurance companies as individual
litigants.

Key words: branch company, parties to the proceedings, capacity of litigation, capacity of civil rights, labor dispute