西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

民用航空器侵权责任主体的相对性及其突破

王锡柱   

  1. 中国民航大学法学院,天津300300
  • 出版日期:2015-05-01 发布日期:2015-05-01
  • 作者简介:王锡柱(1990 –),男(汉族),山东东阿人,硕士研究生,研究方向:民商法、航空法。

The Relativity of Civil Aircraft Tort Liability Subject and Its Breakthrough

Wang Xi - zhu   

  1. School of Law,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin,300300,China
  • Online:2015-05-01 Published:2015-05-01

摘要:

我国《侵权责任法》中民用航空器侵权责任属于高度危险责任范畴,民用航空器经营人有无过错,均应承担责
任。然而,对于经营人之外有过失的第三人能否作为责任主体,以及受害人能否向此类第三人直接求偿并未在该法中
得到明确,进而造成了民用航空器侵权责任主体的相对性。这种相对性在一定程度上保护了受害者,是风险与收益平
衡的选择以及经济责任的体现,但是这种相对性不利于侵权责任法体系的完整,对于受害人以及航空器经营人的保护
并不周延。基于利益平衡以及明辨是非的标准有必要突破这种责任主体的相对性,将具有过失的第三人作为责任主
体,并赋予受害人向第三人的直接请求权。

关键词: 民用航空器, 侵权责任, 责任主体相对性, 严格责任, 过错第三人

Abstract:

The tort liability of civil aircraft in Tort Liability Law belongs to the category of high risk liability. Whether or not
the operator of a civil aircraft is at fault or not,he has to assume responsibility. However,besides the operator,whether or
not the third party is at fault could be taken as the responsibility subject,and whether the victim can claim directly to such
third party,are not specified in Tort Liability Law,which results in the relativity of subject of tort liability in civil aircraft. The
relativity to some extent is beneficial to victims as balance between risks and benefits as well as an embodiment of the economic
responsibility,but the relativity is not conducive to intactness of tort liability law system and could not protect the benefits of
victims and operators perfectly. Given the balance of interests as well as the standard of making a clear distinction between
right and wrong,it is necessary to break the relativity,taking the third party at fault as responsibility subject and to give the
victim the right to claim directly to the third party.

Key words: civil aircraft, tort liability, relativity of responsibility subject, strict liability, the third party at fault