西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhang Teng - long
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The theory of modesty and restraint of criminal law is significant in contemporary criminal jurisprudence,which is characteristic of minimization,economy and complementariness. In the more than 2,000 years of China’s history,the thought of severe punishment has been dominated the legal ideology. And in a variety of legal norms,criminal law has been outshining other law.Tang Code,the typical representative of law in feudal China,adopted criminal law system in legislative style,and punishment was employed in aspects of marriage,debt,property,inheritance,economic administrative. Such ideology of severe punishment has had a huge influence on contemporary judicial practice. The implementation of the“severe and quick” punishment in 1983,1996 and 2001 are good examples of severe punishment ideology. At the institutional level,such example can be seen in the Penal Code of 1979,which provided a clause of analogy,and seriously violated the principle of“no penalty without a law”. Another example of the severe punishment ideology is the fact that the number of death penalty charges in China stays at a much higher level than in western countries.The 8th Amendment to Criminal Law of People’s Republic of China abolished death penalty in 13 kinds of nonviolent crimes such as the crime of smuggling of cultural relics. It also provided lenient punishment to those culprits who are over 75 years,and no recidivism of juvenile delinquency and juvenile crime records removal system. All those regulations are the results of the theory of modesty and restraint criminal law
Key words: restraining of criminal law;severe punishment ideology;the 8th Amendment to Criminal Law of People&rsquo, s Republic of China;crime range;limits of criminal punishment
Zhang Teng - long. The Value of Modesty and Restraint of Criminal Law in the Contemporary Context of Severe Punishment Practice in China[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.06.02.03.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.06.02.03
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2015/V17/I2/80
[1] [意]贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M]. 黄风,译. 北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1993.[2] 张明楷. 论刑法的谦抑性[J]. 法商研究,1995(4):55.[3] 陈兴良. 刑法的价值构造:第2 版[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.[4] 陈忠林. 意大利刑法纲要[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999:7 – 8.[5] 平野龙一. 现代法11 现代法与刑罚[M]. 岩波:岩波书店,1965:21 – 22.[6] [英]梅因. 古代法[M]. 沈景一,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2010:208 – 209.[7] 曾宪义,郑定,赵晓耕. 中国法制史:第2 版[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:71.[8] [英]边沁. 立法理论——刑法典原理[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998:66 – 67.[9] 孟祥沛. 中国传统行刑文化研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2009:224.[10] 梁治平. 法辨中国法的过去现在和未来[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:66.[11] [南宋]朱熹. 论治道[Z].//朱子语类:卷4.[12] 张晋藩,林中,王志刚. 中国刑法史新论[M]. 北京:人民法院出版社,1992:106.[13] 马克昌. 马克昌文集[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2005:195.[14] 陈兴良. 刑法哲学[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992:7.[15] 张明楷. 刑法学:第2 版[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2003:70