西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Xi - zhu
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The tort liability of civil aircraft in Tort Liability Law belongs to the category of high risk liability. Whether or not the operator of a civil aircraft is at fault or not,he has to assume responsibility. However,besides the operator,whether or not the third party is at fault could be taken as the responsibility subject,and whether the victim can claim directly to such third party,are not specified in Tort Liability Law,which results in the relativity of subject of tort liability in civil aircraft. The relativity to some extent is beneficial to victims as balance between risks and benefits as well as an embodiment of the economic responsibility,but the relativity is not conducive to intactness of tort liability law system and could not protect the benefits of victims and operators perfectly. Given the balance of interests as well as the standard of making a clear distinction between right and wrong,it is necessary to break the relativity,taking the third party at fault as responsibility subject and to give the victim the right to claim directly to the third party.
Key words: civil aircraft, tort liability, relativity of responsibility subject, strict liability, the third party at fault
Wang Xi - zhu. The Relativity of Civil Aircraft Tort Liability Subject and Its Breakthrough[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.10.21.01.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.10.21.01
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2015/V17/I3/71
[1] [德]茨威格特. 比较法总论[M]. 潘汉典,等,译. 贵州:贵州人民出版社,1992:3.[2] [德]梅迪库斯. 请求权基础[M]. 陈卫佐,译. 北京:法律出版社,2012:2.[3] 王泽鉴. 民法思维:请求权基础理论体系[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2009.[4] 邱聪智. 从侵权行为归责原理之变动论危险责任之构成[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.[5] 王利明. 侵权行为法归责原则研究[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992:240.[6] 杨惠,郝秀辉. 航空法学原理与实例[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2011.[7] [德]冯 巴尔. 欧洲比较侵权行为法[M]. 张新宝,译. 北京:法律出版社,2001:1.[8] 龙卫球.《侵权责任法》的基础构建与主要发展[J]. 中国社会科学,2012(12):121.[9] [英]彼得 斯坦. 西方社会的法律价值[M]. 王献平,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2004:178.[10] 郝秀辉. 航空器致第三人损害的侵权责任研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学. 2009.[11] [美]德沃金. 法律帝国[M]. 李长青,等,译. 北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996:1 – 2.[12] [美]波斯纳. 道德和法律理论的疑问[M]. 苏力,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:44.[13] 丁以升. 侵权行为法的经济学分析[J]. 法律科学,2004(1):38.[14] 徐冬根. 国际私法[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2013:186 – 190.