西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 58-64.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.11.30.01
Previous Articles Next Articles
Chen Chu - jun
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The nature of concurrence of law articles is substantive one crime and false concurrence,which is different from that of plural crimes in imagined concurrence and that of real concurrence. Clearly defining the connotation and essence of concurrence of law article and clarifying the types of concurrence of law articles are the prerequisites for applying the principle correctly. A new breakthrough is necessary for a concise categorization of types of concurrence of law articles. Concurrence of law article is related to the theory of law relationship,rather than the theory of criminal pattern. The essence of concurrence of law articles is concurrence between constituent elements,whereby concurrence of law articles can be divided into three types: separate concurrence,attachment concurrence and cross concurrence. Separate concurrence which is traditionally called special relationship concurrence of law article is applicable to the principles of“special law exclusion of common law”and abandon the complementary principle of“serious punishment superior to light punishment”
Key words: concurrence of law articles, imagined concurrence, separate concurrence, attachment concurrence, cross competing, special law, common law
Chen Chu - jun. Types of Concurrence of Law Articles and its Application Principle[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(3): 58-64.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.11.30.01
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2015/V17/I3/58
[1] 陈洪兵. 不必严格区分法条竞合与想象竞合大竞合论之提倡[J]. 清华法学,2012(6):39.[2] [德]汉斯 海因里斯 耶赛克,托马斯 魏根特. 德国刑法教科书[M]. 徐久生,译. 北京:中国法制出版社,2001:892 – 893.[3] 林山田. 刑法通论:下册[M]. 台北:台大法学院图书部,1982:586.[4] [日]前田雅英. 刑法总论讲义:第4 版[M]. 东京:东京大学出版会,2006:497.[5] [日]大塚仁. 刑法概说:总论[M]. 冯军,译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:418.[6] [日]山口厚. 刑法[M]. 东京:有斐阁,2005:180.[7] [意]杜里奥 帕多瓦尼. 意大利刑法学原理[M]. 陈忠林,译. 北京:法律出版社,1998:406 – 421.[8] [日]野村稔. 刑法总论[M]. 全其理,何力,译. 北京:法律出版社,2001:448 – 449.[9] [日]大谷实. 刑法总论[M]. 黎宏,译. 北京:法律出版社,2003:357 – 369.[10] [日]泷川幸辰. 犯罪论序说[M]. 王泰,译. 北京:法律出版社,2005:160 – 169.[11] [日]平野龙一. 刑法总论[M]. 东京:有斐阁,1975:409.[12] 张明楷. 犯罪之间的界限与竞合[J]. 中国法学,2008(4):87 – 88.[13] 陈兴良. 法条竞合的学术演进一个学术史的考察[J]. 法律科学,2011(4):63 – 64.[14] 许玉秀. 当代刑法思潮[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2005:780.[15] 郑世创. 假性竞合与想象竞合之辨[J]. 刑事法杂志,2012,31(2):446.[16] 周光权. 法条竞合的特别关系研究兼与张明楷教授商榷[J]. 中国法学,2010(3):158 - 171.[17] 陈兴良. 形式解释论的再宣示[J]. 中国法学,2010(4):42.