西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 55-61.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.01.011
Previous Articles Next Articles
DU Qi LUO Jian-wen LAI Shan-ming
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Given the great disparity of the power between the accuser and the defender in criminal suits and the possibility that the defendant may not be guilty in criminal proceedings,the Criminal Procedure Law mainly aims to ensure human rights instead of impose punishment for crimes. The principles of “presumption of innocence” and “in dubio pro reo” should only apply to the occasions when evidences and facts are questioned,rather than becoming the direction of interpretation of criminal law. Clauses of criminal law are not only the right verbal expressions,but the objects of interpretation of criminal law. “The aim creates all the laws.” Thus,interpretation of criminal law should aim at protecting legal interest behind the clauses of criminal law. If there exists doubt on the interpretation of criminal law,it should enact within the framework of the principles of legality and on the basis of the aims behind the clauses of criminal law,thus to achieve the justice of punishment within the specification as much as possible.
Key words: the principle of in dubio pro reo, interpretation of criminal law, purposes of criminal law suit, the purposes of criminal procedure law, purposes of criminal law
DU Qi LUO Jian-wen LAI Shan-ming. Re advocating of Teleological Method of Interpretation —A Comparative Analysis of the Purposes of Criminal Procedure Law and Criminal Law[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 16(1): 55-61.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.01.011
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2014/V16/I1/55
[1]冯亚东.理性主义与刑法模式[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998:193.[2][意]贝卡里亚.论犯罪与刑罚[M].黄风,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2008:12.[3]陈光中,徐静村.刑事诉讼法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002:38.[4]陈兴良.本体刑法学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.[5]周长军.制度与逻辑[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2005.[6]林钰雄.刑事法理论与实践[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:21.[7][德]H 科殷.法哲学[M].林荣远,译.北京:华夏出版社,2002:118-119.[8]陈瑞华.程序正义的理论基础[J].中国法学,2000(3):45.[9]陈瑞华.走向综合性程序价值理论[J].中国社会科学,1999(6):27-28.[10][日]田口守一.刑事诉讼法[M].刘迪,译.北京:法律出版社,2000:2.[11]胡东飞.刑法目的对刑法解释方向的制约——基于同刑事诉讼法目的比较的分析[J].中国刑事法杂志,2009(1):3-11.[12]张明楷.刑法分则的解释原理:上册[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:340.[13]张明楷.刑法学:第3版[M].北京:法律出版社,2011:27.[14][德]耶赛克,魏根特.德国刑法教科书:总论[M].徐久生,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2001:5.[15]张明楷.刑法的基本观念[M].北京:中国检察出版社,1995:232.[16][美]E 博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:109.[17]最高人民法院刑事审判庭.刑事审判参考:总第37集[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:30.[18]陈兴良.刑法总论精释:第2版[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2011:55.