西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 76-83.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674 5094.2014.11.23.02
Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Meiqiang
Online:
Published:
Supported by:
中国东盟法律研究中心2014 年规划项目“东盟国家刑法比较研究”(CALRC(2014)004)。
Abstract:
The Penal Code of the Philippines specifically stipulates the civil liability of the perpetrators,which is of great significance in ensuring the criminal’s civil liability to pay compensation to the victim,and in guaranteeing the rights of the victim and promoting the integration of criminal law and civil law. About the civil liability of the perpetrator,there exist conflict and contradictions among provisions of China’s criminal law and civil law,which makes it difficult to protect the victims’ right to compensations. Therefore,the author holds it necessary for China’s criminal law and civil law to integrate. As for the realization of integration of China’s criminal law and civil law,efforts should be made in conceptual,normative and practical aspects: we must change our ideas and put emphasis on victim right protection;we must improve criminal legislation and maintain consistency between the criminal law and the civil law,and we must coordinate criminal and civil justice to ensure the resolution of criminal disputes.
HUANG Meiqiang. Integration of Criminal Law and Civil Law ——A Discussion on“Civil Liability”Clause of the Penal Code of the Philippines[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(4): 76-83.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674 5094.2014.11.23.02
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2015/V17/I4/76
[1] 夏勇. 刑法与民法截然不同的法律类型[J]. 法治研究,2013(10):33.[2] 邓崇专. 刑事法与民事法的冲突与融合菲律宾刑法典中的“民事责任”条款及其启示[J]. 河北法学,2011(7):176.[3] 陈晓明. 论修复性司法[J]. 法学研究,2006(1):53.[4] 朱铁军. 刑法与民法之间的交错[J]. 北方法学,2011(2):53.[5] 邹川宁. 刑事受害人救助制度的构建与探索[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2008:2.[6] 张冬梅. 人权的法律保障与和谐社会的构建[J]. 河北法学,2007(10):80.[7] 曲新久. 论刑事附带民事诉讼中公权与私权的协调[J].法学,2003(8):77.[8] 谭志君. 刑事被害人救济的多元模式[J]. 政法论坛,2010(5):154.[9] 马骊华. 我国刑事被害人救助制度之考量[J]. 云南大学学报:法学版,2014(3):126.[10] 张亚军,翟海峰. 刑事被害人国家补偿制度的法理分析[J]. 河北法学,2009(9):92.[11] [美]约翰 罗尔斯. 正义论[M]. 何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:3.[12] 张旭,宋伟卫. 市民社会背景下刑法与民法的冲突及其选择[J]. 河北学刊,2012(5):169.