西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 60-66.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.03.10.01
Previous Articles Next Articles
TONG Qi-xian SUN Na
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
In the academic circle,viewpoints differ widely about the applicable conditions of suspension of execution and immediate execution of death penalty,and many fail to achieve perfection. The path of seeking applicable conditions of death penalty with reprieve in the framework of current criminal law should adhere to different orders: extremely serious crimes are the general condition of death penalty application and the degrees of dangerousness of offenders are the boundary to distinguish immediate execution and suspension execution of death penalty. When dealing with extremely serious crimes the principle of behavior criminal law should be followed and the general conditions of death penalty should be defined on the basis of objective harm. The degrees of personal dangerousness should be considered on the basis of subjective circumstances and follow the principle of behavior person criminal law. The substantive standards of death penalty with reprieve should be implemented by the assessment of degrees of dangerousness of offenders and in accordance to judicial interpretation or guiding cases promulgated by the Supreme Court.
Key words: death penalty;death penalty with reprieve;extremely serious crimes;commit the most heinous crimes, personal dangerousness
TONG Qi-xian SUN Na. An Analysis of Applicable Conditions of Death Penalty with Reprieve[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 16(6): 60-66.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.03.10.01
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2014/V16/I6/60
[1] 高铭暄. 刑法学原理:第3 卷[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1994:554–556.[2] 马克昌. 刑罚通论[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,1999:433–455.[3] 陈兴良. 刑法疏议[M]. 北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1997:139.[4] 张正新. 中国死缓制度的理论与实践[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004:106–112.[5] 高憬宏,刘树德. 死缓适用条件设置的四维思考[J]. 当代法学,2005(9):97.[6] 高铭暄,徐宏. 中国死缓制度的三维考察[J]. 政治与法律,2010(2):8-9.[7] 储槐植. 死刑司法控制:完整解读刑法第四十八条[J].中外法学,2012(5):1016.[8] 夏勇. 死缓适用条件之反思以“李昌奎案”为例[J].法商研究,2013(1):46–51.[9] 任志中,周蔚. 死缓适用实质条件之理论构建宽恕理论之提倡[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2011(5):72.[10] 叶良芳. 死缓适用之实质标准新探[J]. 法商研究.2012(5):98.[11] 赵兴洪. 确立先例标准促进死缓适用之规范化[J]. 法学,2009(11):79.[12] 陈兴良. 死刑适用的司法控制以首批刑事指导案例为视角[J]. 法学,2013(2):44.[13] 梁根林等. 死刑立即执行与缓期执行的界限如何把握[J]. 人民检察,2009(4):36.[14] 刘志伟. 通过死缓减少死刑立即执行的路径探究基于刑法解释论的考量[J]. 政治与法律,2008(11):9.[15] 车浩. 扒窃入刑:贴身禁忌与行为人刑法[J]. 中国法学.2013(1):114.[16] 高铭暄. 中华人民共和国刑法的孕育诞生和发展完善[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2012:225–226.[17] 梁根林. 预备犯普遍处罚原则的困境与突围[J]. 中国法学,2011(2):174.[18] 陈伟. 人身危险性研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2010:6–7.[19] 储槐植,闫雨. 刑事一体化践行[J]. 中国法学,2013(2):142.