西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 70-75.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2015.03.16.05
Previous Articles Next Articles
Chen Youping Ding Wei
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Frozen embryo came into existence in the rapid development of modern assisted reproductive technology as a byproduct of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transplantation technology. In the practice of justice,a series of disputes occur due to the absence of relevant laws and regulations on frozen embryo’s legal nature,its right owners and inheritance,which urges a clear definition of frozen embryo’s legal status. Though the frozen embryo possesses the potential of becoming a solid being,it hasn’t been born as a living being. On the one hand,according to the regulations of General Principles of Civil Law, the frozen embryo does not have the capacity of rights and cannot be defined as the subject in civil legal relationship;it must be an“object”. On the other hand,it cannot be simply defined as an ordinary“object”,but a specific ethical object which has the potential to grow into a human being and therefore possess partial personality. The couple willing to be the parents by surgery is the right owner of the frozen embryo. After the death of the right owners,the frozen embryo can be inherited as heritage by the heir. However,due to its potential to become real living being,the heir only enjoys restricted right of supervision and disposal to the frozen embryo.
Key words: frozen embryo, ethical object, legacy, inheritance, surrogacy
CLC Number:
DF524
Chen Youping Ding Wei. Protection and Restriction of Frozen Embryo’s Inheritance ——Comments on the First Dispute of Frozen Embryo’s Inheritance[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(6): 70-75.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2015.03.16.05
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2015/V17/I6/70
[1] 中国首例胚胎继承案大逆转双方共同处置 [EB /OL](2014-09-18)[2014-10-25] http://health. huanqiu. com/health_news/2014-09/5141985.html [2] 徐国栋. 体外受精胎胚的法律地位研究[J]. 法制与社会 发展,2005(5):53. [3] 王义,冯悦红,江冰,等. 北京市卫生监督机构人员编 制及需求量的现状调查[J]. 中国卫生法制,2004(6): 42. [4] 杨立新. 人的冷冻胚胎的法律属性及其继承问题[J]. 人 民司法应用,2014(13):25. [5] 杨立新,朱呈义. 动物人格权之否定兼论动物之 法律“物格”[J]. 法学研究,2004(5):86. [6] 王泽鉴. 民法总则[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2001:208. [7] 徐国栋. 民法的人文精神[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2009: 238. [8] 周斌. 全国首例已故夫妻冷冻胚胎权属纠纷案审 结失独老人监管处置子女冷冻胚胎[N]. 法制日 报,2014 - 9 - 18(5). [9] 李燕,金根林. 冷冻胚胎的权利归属及权利行使规则 研究[J]. 人民司法,2014(13):40. [10] 赵玲. 辅助生殖领域法律空白亟待填补[N]. 人民法院 报,2014 - 5 - 20(3). [11] 张艳玲. 人工生殖法律问题研究[M]. 北京:法律出版 社,2006. [12] 夏勇. 人权概念起源权利的历史哲学:修订版[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001:192. [13] 罗满景. 中国代孕制度之立法重构以无偿的完全 代孕为对象[J]. 时代法学,2009(4):74. [14] 张威,杜文俊. 人工生殖的基本法律问题研究[J]. 社会 科学,2001(7):73. [15] 刘长秋,顾华. 浅议辅助生殖技术对我国民、刑立法带 来的挑战[J]. 卫生政策,2002(6):42.