Inclusive Leadership and its Effect on Subordinates' Psychological Security——An Analysis of Mediator of HighQuality Relationships

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.09.15.01

Abstract

Abstract: High turnover plays negative influences on enterprise management, and may cause psychological insecurity in employees. Previous studies have analyzed the direct effect of inclusive leadership on the subordinates' psychological security, but have not revealed the "black box" of the relationship. From the perspective of relationship coordination theory, this study chooses high-quality relationships as the mediator, focuses on the influence mechanism of inclusive leadership on the subordinates' psychological security. 220 valid questionnaires from 15 enterprises were used for statistical analysis. The conclusions of the study are as follows:(1)inclusive leadership has a significant positive impact on the subordinates' psychological security; (2) inclusive leadership exhibits a significant positive impact on high quality relationships, and on the shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect as well;(3) the high-quality relationships, and shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect functions as the mediator between inclusive leadership and the subordinates' psychological security.

Key words: inclusive leadership, subordinates' psychological security, shared goals, shared knowledge, mutual respect

CLC Number:

C933.2

YU Xuan, YUAN Yue, XIA Wenjing. Inclusive Leadership and its Effect on Subordinates' Psychological Security——An Analysis of Mediator of HighQuality Relationships[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(6): 31-37.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.09.15.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2019/V21/I6/31

References

[1] 张靖风,朱晓妹.基于心理安全视角的中小企业人才流失问题研究[J].产业与科技论坛,2019(5):287-288.
[2] Kahn W A.Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33(4):692-724.
[3] May D R, Gilson R L, Harter L M. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work[J]. Journal of Occupational&Organizational Psychology, 2011, 77(1):11-37.
[4] Hülsheger U R, Anderson N, Salgado J F. Team-level predictors of innovation at work:a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5):11-28.
[5] Chandrasekaran A, Mishra A. Task design, team context, and psychological safety:an empirical analysis of R&D projects in high technology organizations[J]. Production&Operations Management, 2012, 21(6):977-996.
[6] Nembhard I M, Edmondson A C. Making it safe:the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(7):941-966.
[7] 朱瑜,钱姝婷.包容型领导研究前沿探析与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2014,36(2):55-64+80.
[8] Carmeli A, Reiter-Palmon R, Ziv E. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace:the mediating role of psychological safety[J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2010, 22(3):250-260.
[9] 汪群,陈敏敏.包容型领导对团队创新行为的影响——团队心理安全感的中介作用[J].领导科学,2017(11):31-33.
[10] Carmeli A, Benhador B, Waldman D A, et al. How leaders cultivate social capital and nurture employee vigor:implications for job performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(6):1553.
[11] Dutton J E, Ragins B R. Exploring positive relationships at work:building a theoretical and research foundation[M]. Mahwah, NJ, US:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2007:192-193.
[12] Gittell J H.Relational coordination:coordinating work through relationships of shared goals,shared knowledge and mutual respect[C]//Kyriakidou O, Ozbilgin M. Relational perspectives in organizational studies:a research companion.Brookfield,VT:Edward Elgar Publishers,2006.
[13] Gittell J H. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups:relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects[J]. Ma-nagement Science, 2002, 48(11):1408-1426.
[14] Edmondson A C.Learning from mistakes is easier said than done:group and organization influences on the detection and correction of human error[J].Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,1996,32(1):5-28.
[15] Hantula D A. Inclusive leadership:the essential leader-follower relationship[J]. Psychological Record, 2009, 59(4):701-704.
[16] 蔡地,王悦,马金鹏.领导越包容,员工工作越主动?个人-团队匹配和权力距离的作用[J].预测,2017,36(5):1-7.
[17] Tynan R. The effects of threat sensitivity and face giving on dyadic psychological safety and upward communication[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2010, 35(2):223-247.
[18] 朱其训."包容性增长"实现路径探析——基于"包容性领导"的视角[J].前沿,2011(23):8-11.
[19] 李燕萍,杨婷,潘亚娟,等.包容性领导的构建与实施——基于新生代员工管理视角[J].中国人力资源开发, 2012(3):31-35.
[20] Aranzamendez G, James D, Toms R. Finding antecedents of psychological safety:a step toward quality improvement[J]. Nursing Forum, 2014, 50(3):171-178.
[21] 苏屹,刘敏.共享型领导、心理安全与员工进谏行为[J].工业工程与管理,2018, 23(2):152-158.
[22] Walumbwa F O, Schaubroeck J. Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior:mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5):1275-1286.
[23] Lee F, Edmondson A C, Thomke S, et al. The mixed effects of inconsistency on experimentation in organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(3):310-326.
[24] Dinh J E, Lord R G, Gardner W L, et al. Leadership theory and research in the new millennium:current theoretical trends and changing perspectives[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25(1):36-62.
[25] 刘新梅,韩骁,崔天恒,等.工作压力、情绪状态与员工创造力的关系研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2015,30(7):84-89.
[26] Shore L M, Randel A E, Chung B G, et al. Inclusion and diversity in work groups:a review and model for future research[J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(4):1262-1289.
[27] LePine M, Zhang Y, Crawford E R, Rich B L. Turning their pain to gain:charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance[J]. Academy Management Journal, 2016, 59(3):1036-1059.
[28] Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(2):350-383.
[29] Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5):879-903.
[30] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51:1173-1182.