西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 85-90.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.12.27.04
Previous Articles Next Articles
Huang Yan - xiang
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Owners of ordinary cars and owners of luxury cars have equal legal status,bearing the same responsibilities and obligations,but in traffic accidents involving both ordinary cars and luxury cars,the compensation results are not in line with people’s concept of justice. Therefore,it is of significance to balance the rights and obligations of owners of ordinary cars and luxury cars when traffic accidents occur. The current legal system and insurance system cannot solve the problem of unreasonable compensation after the accident. The author holds that conflicts between ordinary and luxury car owners can be eased by setting insurance for luxury cars which can help achieve substantial justice,protecting equal road rights,and the weaker party in traffic accidents. The luxury vehicle insurance compensation covers only property damage caused by ordinary vehicles. For this purpose,the insurance system is to be reformed to clearly define the maximum amount of compensation and the lowest amount of premium for luxury vehicle insurance.
Key words: traffic accidents;insurance system, the Compulsory Traffic Accident Liability Insurance for Motor Vehicles, luxury vehicle insurance
Huang Yan - xiang. On Traffic Accident Insurance for Luxury Cars[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(3): 85-90.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2014.12.27.04
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2015/V17/I3/85
[1] 武卫强. 岂能“只买贵的不买对的”[N]. 中国青年报,2012 – 8 – 16(09).[2] 邹海林. 责任保险论[M]. 北京:法律出版社,1999:47.[3] 汽车圈外人责任险几多钱[EB/OL](2014 – 11 – 04)[2014 – 12 – 13]. http://www.mengyinxinwenwang.com.cn/qiche/20141104/574.html.[4] 黄文新,彭维萍. 雅阁撞上兰博基尼无力赔付[N]. 长沙晚报,2014 – 9 – 10(01).[5] 正义网.李勇,骆凯“. 劳斯莱斯”被撞与路权平等[EB/OL](2012 – 02 – 16)[2014 – 10 – 20].http://auto.hexun.-com/2012-02-16/138307849.html.[6] 曾庆洪. 关于解决“平民撞豪车”的提案[EB/OL].(2012 – 03 – 05)[2014 – 10 – 20].http://www.autohome.com.cn/news/201203/302854.html.[7] 张文显. 西方法哲学[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2011:298.[8] 凯尔逊. 什么是正义[J]. 现代外国哲学社会科学文摘,1961(8):6.[9] 张锐智. 论罗马法学家对西方法学史的独特贡献[J]. 辽宁大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2006(2):143 – 147.[10] [美]约翰 罗尔斯. 正义论[M]. 何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:22.[11] 佩雷尔曼. 正义、法律和辩论[M].D Reidel 出版公司,1980:1.[12] 姚恒江. 中国交通事故处理制度之不足之处以及解决途径[D]. 重庆:西南政法大学,2010.[13] [德]布吕格迈耶尔. 中国侵权责任法学者建议稿及立法理由[M]. 朱岩,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2009:125.[14] 韩文. 机动车交通事故责任构成与分担研究[M]. 武汉:武汉理工大学,2010.[15] 杨立新. 我国道路交通事故责任归责原则研究[J]. 法学,2008(10):109 – 118.[16] 谢薇,韩文. 对《侵权责任法》上机动车交通事故责任主体的解读以与《道路交通安全法》第76 条责任主体的对接为中心[J]. 法学评论,2010(6):138-147.[17] 周海涛. 强制保险法律制度国际比较研究[D]. 大连:大连海事大学,2010.[18] 王颖. 美国的汽车保险制度分析[J]. 中华汽摩配,2005(6):57 – 59.[19] 德士. 法理学[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2005:237.