Does Authoritarian Leadership Necessarily Inhibit Employee Voice Behavior?——A Discussion on the Mediating Effect of Career Calling

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.12.08.01

Abstract

Abstract: Based on social exchange theory and self-determination theory,the influence of ambidextrous authoritarian leadership(juan-chiuan-shang-yan leadership)on employees' voice behavior was examined,and the mediating role of career calling was tested. A total of 259 valid samples were collected, and the empirical research was carried out using the statistical analysis software SPSS and PROCESS plug-in using hierarchical regression and Bootstraping method. The empirical results show that there is no direct influence between juan-chiuan leadership and employees' voice behavior;shang-yan leadership is significantly positively correlated with employees' voice behavior;career calling plays a full mediating role between juan-chiuan leadership and employees' voice behavior, and a partial mediating role between shang-yan leadership and employees' voice behavior. The detailed analysis of authoritarian leadership into juan-chiuan leadership and shang-yan leadership will help the theoretical and practical circles to correctly understand the complete connotation of authoritarian leadership and the active role shang-yan leadership plays. The findings provide enterprise managers with suggestions for effective encouragement to employee voice behavior.

Key words: authoritarian leadership, juan-chiuan leadership, shang-yan leadership, career calling, employee voice behavior

CLC Number:

F273.1

ZHU Yunjuan, DING Guodong. Does Authoritarian Leadership Necessarily Inhibit Employee Voice Behavior?——A Discussion on the Mediating Effect of Career Calling[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(2): 27-35.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.12.08.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2020/V22/I2/27

References

[1] Morrison E, Milliken F. Organizational Silence:A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World[J]. Academy of Management Review,2000,25(4):706-725.
[2] 景保峰. 威权领导对员工建言行为的影响:一个有中介的调节作用分析[J].领导科学, 2015(11):50-53.
[3] 沈翔鹰,穆桂斌. 家长式领导与员工建言行为:组织认同的中介作用[J].心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6):841-846.
[4] 周婉茹,周丽芳,郑伯埙. 专权与尚严之辨:再探威权领导的内涵与恩威并济的效果[J].本土心理学研究, 2010, 34(2):223-284.
[5] 王磊,邢志杰. 权力感知视角下的双元威权领导与员工创新行为[J].管理学报, 2019, 16(7):987-996.
[6] Chou L F, Cheng B S. Opening the Black Box:A TwoDimensional Model of Authoritarian Leadership and Task Performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 2014, 56(4):397-414.
[7] Dobrow S R, Tosti-Kharas J. Calling:the Development of a Scale Measure[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2011, 64(4):1001-1049.
[8] 段锦云. 家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响:心理安全感的中介机制[J].管理评论, 2012, 24(10):109-116.
[9] 田在兰,黄培伦. 基于自我认知理论的家长式领导对建言的影响[J].科研管理, 2014, 35(10):150-160.
[10] 周建涛,廖建桥. 为何中国员工偏好沉默——威权领导对员工建言的消极影响[J].商业经济与管理, 2012(11):71-81.
[11] Gagné M, Deci E L. Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2005, 26(4):331-362.
[12] Deci E L, Ryan R M. The General Causality Orientations Scale:Self-Determination in Personality[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1985, 19(2):109-134.
[13] 吴宗佑. 主管威权领导与部属的工作满意度与组织承诺:信任的中介历程与情绪智力的调节效果[J].本土心理学, 2008(30):3-36.
[14] Lepine J A, Van Dyne L. Predicting Voice Behavior in Work Groups[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83(6):853-868.
[15] Morrison E W, Wheeler-Smith S L, Kamdar D. Speaking up in Groups:A Cross-Level Study of Group Voice Climate and Voice[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2011, 96(1):183-191.
[16] Deci E, Connell J P, Ryan R. Self-Determination in a Work Organization[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74(4):580-590.
[17] Gouldner A W. The Norm of Reciprocity:A Preliminary Statement[J]. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25(2):161-178.
[18] Chen X P, Eberly M B, Chiang T J, et al. Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders:Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Employee Performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(3):796-819.
[19] 樊景立,郑伯壎. 华人组织的家长式领导:一项文化观点的分析[J].本土心理学研究, 2000(13):126-180.
[20] 林姿葶,郑伯壎. 性别以领导角色孰先孰后?主管-部属性别配对、共事时间及家长式领导[J].中华心理学刊, 2007, 49(4):433-450.
[21] Chatman J A. Improving Interactional Organizational Research:A Model of Person-Organization Fit[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(3):333-349.
[22] A O C, J C, F C D. People and Organizational Culture:A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing PersonOrganization Fit[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(3):487-516.
[23] Detert J, Burris E. Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice:Is The Door Really Open?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(4):869-884.
[24] Bunderson J S, Thompson J A. The Call of the Wild:Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2009, 54(1):32-57.
[25] Kalberg S, Kalberg S. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism[M]. New York:Routledge, 2001:125-133.
[26] Hall D T, Chandler D E. Psychological Success:When the Career is a Calling[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2005, 26(2):155-176.
[27] Dik B, Eldridge B, Steger M. Development and Validation of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ) and Brief Calling Scale(BCS)[J]. Journal of Career Assessment, 2012, 20(3):242-263.
[28] 段锦云,黄彩云. 变革型领导对员工建言的影响机制再探:自我决定的视角[J].南开管理评论, 2014, 17(4):98-109.
[29] 王圣慧,易明,罗瑾琏. 双元领导对建言行为的影响:内部动机与外部动机的作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(7):136-150.
[30] Spreitzer G M. Social Structural Characteristics Of Psychological Empowerment[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(2):483-504.
[31] Cavanaugh M A, Boswell W R, Roehling M V, et al. An Empirical Examination of Self-Reported Work Stress among U.S. Managers[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(1):65-74.
[32] 呙林义,康宛竹,张吉昌. 挑战性压力源对员工主动行为的影响——职业使命感与授权型领导的作用[J].科技与经济, 2019, 32(1):66-70.
[33] Domene J F. Calling and Career Outcome Expectations:The Mediating Role of Self-efficacy[J]. Journal of Career Assessment, 2012, 20(3):281-292.
[34] Duffy R D, Dik B J. Research on Calling:What have we Learned and Where are we going?[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2013, 83(3):428-436.
[35] Liang J, Farh C, Farh J. Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice:A Two-Wave Examination[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(1):71-92.
[36] Edwards J R, Lambert L S. Methods for Integrating Moderation and Mediation:A General Analytical Framework Using Moderated Path Analysis[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(1):1-22.